Abstract
This chapter is dedicated to prototyping, one of the steps of the Smart Service Engineering Cycle. It includes three phases: realizing core functionalities, developing core functionalities, and testing functionalities with customers. In order to realize prototypes successfully, methodical aspects of rapid IoT prototyping are used.
First of all, this chapter explains the motivation behind rapid prototyping and provides an introduction to the approach. The concept of rapid IoT prototyping is based on the idea of developing short-cycle solution variants on the basis of benefit hypotheses or benefit promises and user stories focusing on them. The aim is to achieve data acquisition, aggregation, linkage, processing, and finally visualization by developing it in a vertically integrated manner. Once this is accomplished, the prototype can be evaluated with customers, which also makes it possible to put the benefit hypotheses to the test. Finally, the collected customer feedback can be incorporated more quickly into the development process of new prototype versions, leading to a continuous improvement of the user experience as well as a constant focus on prioritizing the user. Another component of rapid IoT prototyping is working and thinking in terms of minimum viable products (MVP), i.e., solutions that do not meet all of the defined requirements in the first iteration, but are nevertheless already functional.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barros, M. (2013) Here’s how to make hardware startups more than just a fad. Wired.
Bertsche, B., & Bullinger, H.-J. (2007). Entwicklung und Erprobung innovativer Produkte - Rapid Prototyping: Grundlagen, Rahmenbedingungen und Realisierung [Online]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Bouveret, C. C. (2017, December 13). Was steckt hinter den buzzwords low-code und rapid application development? ComputerWoche.
Brecher, C., Klocke, F., Schmitt, R., & Schuh, G. (Eds.). (2017). AWK Aachener Werkzeugmaschinen-Kolloquium 2017 Internet of Production für agile Unternehmen. Apprimus: Aachen.
Hackney, P. M. (2003). The development of three-dimensional printing techniques for ‘concept modellers’ to competitive rapid prototyping systems. In A. E. W. Rennie, D. M. Jacobson, & C. E. Bocking (Eds.), Third National Conference on Rapid Prototyping, Tooling, and Manufacturing. 20–21 June 2002 Centre for Rapid Design and Manufacture Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, UK. National Conference on Rapid Prototyping, Tooling, and Manufacturing (3, 2002, High Wycombe) (1st ed.). Bury St Edmunds: Professional Engineering Publication.
Jordan, F., Bernardy, A., Stroh, M., Horeis, J., & Stich, V. (2017). Requirements-based matching approach to configurate cyber-physical systems for SMEs. In Proceedings of PICMET 2018 -Portland international conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology management for the interconnected world (pp. 1–7). Portland, OR: IEEE.
Kampker, A., Frank, J., & Jussen, P. (2017, May 1). Digitale Vernetzung im Service. WiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 46, 4–11.
Mazzei, D., Baldi, G., Montelisciani, G., & Fantoni, G. (2018). A full stack for quick prototyping of IoT solutions. Annals of Telecommunications, 73(7–8), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-018-0644-5.
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition: Spotlight on managing the internet of things. Harvard Business Review, 1912(11), 64–88.
Reinhart, G., Milberg, J., & Geuer, A. (1996). Einsatzpotential des rapid prototyping in der Produktentwicklung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Schaumüller-Bichl, I., & Kolberger, A. (2016). IoT als Herausforderung für die Informationssicherheit. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 133(7), 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-016-0427-5.
Schuh, G., Hoffmann, J., Gruber, M., & Zeller, V. (2017). Managing IT complexity in the manufacturing industry – An agenda for action. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: JSCI, 15, 44–52.
Stich, V., Hoffmann, J., & Heimes, P. (2018). Software-definierte Plattformen: Eigenschaften, Integrationsanforderungen und Praxiserfahrungen in produzierenden Unternehmen. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 55(1), 25–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hicking, J. (2020). Smart Service Prototyping. In: Maleshkova, M., Kühl, N., Jussen, P. (eds) Smart Service Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58182-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58182-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58181-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58182-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)