iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24311-1_21
Cyclable City: A Territorial Assessment Procedure for Disruptive Policy-Making on Urban Mobility | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cyclable City: A Territorial Assessment Procedure for Disruptive Policy-Making on Urban Mobility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019 (ICCSA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11624))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1708 Accesses

Abstract

Urban cycling is one of the main references for the development of sustainable mobility models [1]. Cycling is an active transport mode that is alternative to the use of public and private means of travel. At city scale it collects high levels of users satisfaction. Urban policies encouraging this transport mode are compared with modal split solutions that must take into account the morphological characteristics of the context as well as the organizational dimensions of urban transport. In this work, after highlighting good practices related to traffic moderation, the promotion of soft active mobility (Living street) and the widespread cycling in the urban context, we propose an intervention scenario for the development of an urban cycling infrastructure scheme that integrates current transport infrastructures (mechanized pedestrian mobility) according to a multimodal approach. The sample context is the city of Potenza (Basilicata - Italy). The focus on slow mobility is part of urban mobility strategies. The contribution described in this paper aims at the integration of mechanized pedestrian mobility and local public transport, by road and rail, with active cycle mobility. The aim is to demonstrate how the proposed scheme is feasible with respect to the steepness and integrates infrastructural solutions and reorganization of driveway mobility for widespread use of the bicycle (both traditional and the most innovative forms e-bike and pedelec).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Parliament: Risoluzione sulla sicurezza stradale in Europa 2011–2020 (2010/2235(INI)) (2011). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7-2011-0264+0+DOC+XML+V0//IT. Accessed May 2019

  2. United Nations: State of the World’s Cities Report 2012/2013: Prosperity of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Staricco, L.: Smart mobility: Opportunità e condizioni. TeMA J. Land Use Mob. Environ. 6, 341–354 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Strategy and Policy Analysis System. ESPAS: Global Trends to 2030: Can the EU Meet the Challenges Ahead? An inter-institutional EU project with the participation of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European External Action Service; European Strategy and Policy Analysis System: Brussels, Belgium, pp. 1–82 (2015). http://europa.eu/espas/pdf/espas-report-2015.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  5. European Commission: Together Towards Competitive and Resource-Efficient Urban Mobility. COM (2013) 913 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission: Green Paper: Towards a New Culture for Urban Mobility. COM (2007) 551 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission: Action Plan on Urban Mobility. COM (2009) 490 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission: White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. COM (2011) 144 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission: A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility. COM (2016) 501; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2016a)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission: European Political Strategy Center Strategic Notes towards Low-Emission Mobility—Driving the Modernisation of the EU Economy (2016b)

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission: Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015. 11. Smart, Green and Integrated Transport Revised. 10 December 2013 (2013a). http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-transport_en.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2018

  12. Benevolo, C., Dameri, R.P., D’Auria, B.: Smart mobility in smart city. In: Torre, T., Braccini, A., Spinelli, R. (eds.) Empowering Organizations Enabling Platforms and Artefacts. LNISO, vol. 11, pp. 13–28. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinna, F., Masala, F., Garau, C.: Urban policies and mobility trends in italian smart cities. Sustainability 9, 494 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyons, G.: Getting smart about urban mobility – aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable. Transp. Res. Part A 115(2018), 4–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam, D., Head, P.: Sustainable urban mobility. In: Inderwildi, O., King, S. (eds.) Energy, Transport, & The Environment. Springer, London (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Banister, D.: The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Curtis, C.: Planning for sustainable accessibility: the implementation challenge. Transp. Policy 15, 104–112 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyons, G., Davidson, C.: Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88, 104–116 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am. J. Publ. Health 93(9), 1478–1483 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2(3), 199–219 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9209(97)00009-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giles-Corti, B., Donovan, R.J.: Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am. J. Publ. Health 93(9), 1583–1589 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Handy, S.L., Clifton, K.J.: Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28(4), 317–346 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011850618753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elkins, T.H., Hofmeister, B.: Berlin – The Spatial Structure of a Divided City. USA: Methuen & Co. in Association with Methuen, Inc. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bushell, M.: Design, policy, and bicycle ridership – a comparison between Berlin, Germany and Washington, DC. Master thesis, North Carolina: University of North Carolina (2010). http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/spapers/id/1281

  25. Meng, M., Koh, P.P., Wong, Y.D., Zhong, Y.H.: Influences of urban characteristics on cycling: experiences of four cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 13(2014), 78–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tira, M.: Safety of pedestrians and cyclists in Europe: the DUMAS approach. In: Sustainable Transport, pp. 339–350. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moccia, F.D.: Stazioni e città nella prospettiva ecologica. Inconsapevoli precursori. Urbanistica 145, 64–76 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marioli, L.: Mobilità sostenibile e trasporto intermodale. Rivista di diritto dell’economia, dei trasporti e dell’ambiente 11, 19–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76, 265–294 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kristianssen, A.-C., Andersson, R., Belinc, M.-A., Nilsene, P.: Swedish vision zero policies for safety – a comparative policy content analysis. Saf. Sci. 103(2018), 260–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. OECD/International Transport Forum (ITF): Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm Shift to a Safe System. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789282108055-en

  32. World Health Organization: Global status report on road safety 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva (2018). Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO

    Google Scholar 

  33. United Nations: Resolution A/RES/64/255. Improving Global Road Safety. Sixty-fourth session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York, 10 May 2010 (2010). http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/UN_GA_resolution-54-255-en.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 2 Dec 2018

  34. Harris, M.A., et al.: Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design. Inj. Prev. 19, 303–310 (2013). injuryprev-2012-040561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pedroso, F.E., Angriman, F., Bellows, A.L., Taylor, K.: Bicycle use and cyclist safety following Boston’s bicycle infrastructure expansion, 2009–2012. Am. J. Publ. Health 106, 2171–2177 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Poulos, R.G., et al.: An exposure based study of crash and injury rates in a cohort of transport and recreational cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 78, 29–38 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50, 106–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas, B., DeRobertis, M.: The safety of urban cycle tracks: a review of the literature. Accid. Anal. Prev. 52, 219–227 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kondo, M.C., Morrison, C., Guerrad, E., Kaufmane, E.J., Wiebeb, D.J.: Where do bike lanes work best? A Bayesian spatial model of bicycle lanes and bicycle crashes. Saf. Sci. 103(2018), 225–233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobsen, P.: Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj. Prev. 9, 205–209 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. The Guardian: Superblocks to the rescue: Barcelona’s plan to give streets back to residents (2016). https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/may/17/superblocks-rescue-barcelona-spain-plan-give-streets-back-residents. Accessed 15 Oct 2018

  42. Municipality of Barcelona: Urban Mobility Plan (2013–2018) (2013). https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/en/what-we-do-and-why/active-and-sustainable-mobility/urban-mobility-plan. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  43. Zones 30: comment ça marche? (2018). www.paris.fr. Accessed 21 Mar 2018. https://www.paris.fr/actualites/zones-30-comment-ca-marche-5507. Accessed 3 Oct 2018

  44. Le Parisien: Tout Paris à 30 km/h, c’est pour demain! 14 September 2017. http://www.leparisien.fr/paris-75005/tout-paris-a-30-km-h-c-est-pour-demain-14-09-2017-7261308.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2018

  45. Municipality of Bilbao: Bilbao 30 (2018a). https://www.bilbao.eus/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername1=Content-disposition&blobheadername2=pragma&blobheadervalue1=attachment%3B+filename%3DBilbao30.pdf&blobheadervalue2=public&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1274207472664&ssbinary=true. Accessed 3 Dec 2018

  46. Municipality of Bilbao: Plan de Movilidad Urbana Sostenible de Bilbao 2015–2030 (PMUS) (2018b). https://www.bilbao.eus/cs/Satellite?c=BIO_Noticia_FA&cid=1279179787848&language=es&pageid=3012589425&pagename=Bilbaonet%2FBIO_Noticia_FA%2FBIO_Noticia. Accessed 18 Nov 2018

  47. Sgobbo, A., Basile, M.: Sharing sustainability. UPLanD – J. Urban Plan. Land. Environ. Des. 2(2), 255–297 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Basilicata Region: Regional Transport Plan 2016–2026, approved by the Regional Council on 21.12.2016 (2016). http://www.regione.basilicata.it/giunta/site/Giunta/detail.jsp?otype=1101&id=3018870

  49. Municipality of Potenza: City Plan, adopted in 31 March 2009 (2009), http://www.comune.potenza.it/?p=1681. Accessed 16 Dec 2018

  50. Municipality of Potenza: Piano Urbano della Mobilità di Potenza (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Basilicata Region, Municipality of Potenza: Documento Strategico ITI Sviluppo Urbano della città di Potenza (2017). http://www.comune.potenza.it/?p=23296. Accessed 23 Dec 2018

  52. Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport: Italian Highway Code - Legislative Decree 295 of 30 April 1992 (1992). http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?p=normativa&o=vd&id=1&id_cat=&id_dett=0. Accessed 15 Dec 2018

  53. Aashto (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials): Aashto Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Las Casas, G., Murgante, B., Scorza, F.: Regional local development strategies benefiting from open data and open tools and an outlook on the renewable energy sources contribution. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R. (eds.) Smart Energy in the Smart City. GET, pp. 275–290. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31157-9_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Carbone, R., et al.: Using open data and open tools in defining strategies for the enhancement of Basilicata region. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2018. LNCS, vol. 10964, pp. 725–733. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95174-4_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Sustrans: Sustrans Design Manual - Handbook for Cycle-Friendly Design. Sustrans, Bristol, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

  57. Institute of Transport Engineers (ITE): ITE traffic calming definition. ITE J. 67(7), 22–24 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rahman, F., Takemoto, A., Sakamoto, K., Kubota, H.: Comparative study of design and planning process of traffic calming devices. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 5, pp. 1322–1336. Saitama University, Saitama (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Juhász, M., Koren, C.: Getting an insight into the effects of traffic calming measures on road safety. In: 6th Transport Research Arena 18–21 April 2016, Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 14, pp. 3811–3820 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.466

  60. Pardon, N., Average, C.: The effectiveness of traffic calming measures in reducing road carnage in Masvingo urban. Int. J. Sci. Knowl. 3(2), 2305–2493 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Taylor, M.C., Lynam, D.A., Baruya, A.: The effects of drivers’ speed on the frequency of road accidents. TRL Report 421, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Van Schagen, I. (ed.): Traffic calming schemes: opportunities and implementation strategies. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, The Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  63. National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO): Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  64. European Transport Safety Council (ETSC): Briefing – Contraflow cycling, March 2018 (2018). https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/Briefing-Contraflow-Cycling.pdf

  65. Vandebulcke, G., Thomas, I., Int Panis, L.: Predicting cycling accident risk in Brussels: a spatial case-control approach. Accid. Anal. Prev. (2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457513002686

  66. Di Bussolo, R.: Quartiere esteso a strade strette - Piraghetto – Mestre. In: Passigato, M. (eds.) La moderazione del traffico. Quaderno del Centro Studi FIAB Riccardo Gallimbeni, pp. 56–61 (2012). http://www.fiab-areatecnica.it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-studi/fiab/434-la-moderazione-del-traffico.html

  67. Manuetti, D.: Moderazione del Traffico a Mirafiori - Torino - Interventi e risultati. In: Passigato, M. (ed.) La moderazione del traffico. Quaderno del Centro Studi FIAB Riccardo Gallimbeni, pp. 67–70 (2012). http://www.fiab-areatecnica.it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-studi/fiab/434-la-moderazione-del-traffico.html

  68. Dondè, M.: Moderazione sugli assi urbani della viabilità principale - via Emilia Ospizio - Reggio Emilia. In: Passigato, M. (ed.) La moderazione del traffico. Quaderno del Centro Studi FIAB Riccardo Gallimbeni, pp. 75–76 (2012). http://www.fiab-areatecnica.it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-studi/fiab/434-la-moderazione-del-traffico.html

  69. Midgley, P.: Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas. Background Paper No. 8, CSD19/2011/BP8, Commission on Sustainable Development, United Nations (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Las Casas, G., Scorza, F.: A renewed rational approach from liquid society towards anti-fragile planning. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10409, pp. 517–526. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62407-5_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  71. Casas, G.L., Scorza, F.: Sustainable planning: a methodological toolkit. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9786, pp. 627–635. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  72. Pontrandolfi, P., Scorza, F.: Sustainable urban regeneration policy making: inclusive participation practice. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 552–560. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Scorza, F., Pontrandolfi, P.: Citizen participation and technologies: the C.A.S.T. architecture. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9156, pp. 747–755. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21407-8_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  74. Murgante, B., Botonico, G., Graziadei, A., Sassano, G., Amato, F., Scorza, F.: Innovation, technologies, participation: new paradigms towards a 2.0 citizenship. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 11(1), 62–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2019.098814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Saganeiti, L., Favale, A., Pilogallo, A., Scorza, F., Murgante, B.: Assessing urban fragmentation at regional scale using sprinkling indexes. Sustainability 10(9), 3274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sassano, G., Graziadei, A., Amato, F., Murgante, B.: Involving citizens in the reuse and regeneration of urban peripheral spaces. In: Nunes, Silva C., Buček, J. (eds.) Local Government and Urban Governance in Europe. Urban Book Series, pp. 193–206. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43979-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 10, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Giovanni Fortunato, Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante

Authors
  1. Giovanni Fortunato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Scorza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beniamino Murgante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Fortunato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  2. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  3. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  4. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Elena Stankova

  5. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Vladimir Korkhov

  6. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo Torre

  7. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A.C. Rocha

  8. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  9. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  10. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fortunato, G., Scorza, F., Murgante, B. (2019). Cyclable City: A Territorial Assessment Procedure for Disruptive Policy-Making on Urban Mobility. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11624. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24311-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24311-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24310-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24311-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation