iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13001-5_10
MEASURed: Evaluating Sensor-Based Activity Recognition Scenarios by Simulating Accelerometer Measures from Motion Capture | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

MEASURed: Evaluating Sensor-Based Activity Recognition Scenarios by Simulating Accelerometer Measures from Motion Capture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Activity Sensing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Adaptive Environments ((SPSADENV))

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition from accelerometer sensors is key to enable applications such as fitness tracking or health status monitoring at home. However, evaluating the performance of activity recognition systems in real-life deployments is challenging to the multiple differences in sensor number, placement and orientation that may arise in real settings. Considering such differences requires a large amount of labeled data. To overcome the challenges and costs associated to the collection of a wide range of heterogeneous data, we propose a simulator, called MEASURed, which uses motion capture to simulate accelerometer data on different settings. Then, using the simulated data to estimate the performance of activity recognition models under different scenarios. In this chapter, we describe MEASURed and evaluate its performance in estimating the accuracy of activity recognition models. Our results show that MEASURed can estimate the average accuracy of an activity recognition model using real accelerometer magnitude data. By using motion capture to simulate accelerometer data, the sensor research community can profit from visual datasets that have been collected by other communities to evaluate performance of activity recognition in a wide range of activities. MEASURed can be used to evaluate activity recognition classifiers in settings with different number, placement, and sampling rate of accelerometer sensors. The evaluation on a broad spectrum of scenarios gives a more general view of models and their limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 15.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We obtain linear acceleration using a high pass filter as described in https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/sensors/sensors_motion#java and apply a median filter to remove noise.

  2. 2.

    https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/MHEALTH+Dataset.

  3. 3.

    http://sensor.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/#dataset_realworld.

  4. 4.

    http://resources.mpi-inf.mpg.de/HDM05/index.html.

  5. 5.

    https://accad.osu.edu/research/motion-lab/system-data.

  6. 6.

    http://paco.psy.gla.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&view=viewcategories&Itemid=62.

  7. 7.

    http://dancedb.eu/main/performances.

  8. 8.

    http://mocap.cs.cmu.edu.

  9. 9.

    https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Vicon+Physical+Action+Data+Set.

References

  • Amft O (2005) On the need for quality standards in activity recognition using ubiquitous sensors. In: UbiComp ’13 Adjunct proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, pp 62–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Asare P, Dickerson RF et al (2013) BodySim: a multi-domain modeling and simulation framework for body sensor networks research and design. In: Proceedings of SenSys ’13, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Banos O, Calatroni A, et al (2012) Kinect=imu? learning MIMO signal mappings to automatically translate activity recognition systems across sensor modalities. In: Proceedings of the 16th ISWCWashington, DC, USA, 2012. IEEE Computer Society, pp 92–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulling A, Blanke U, Schiele B (2014) A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput Surv 46(3):33:1–33:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavarriaga R, Bayati H, Millán JR (2013) Unsupervised adaptation for acceleration-based activity recognition: robustness to sensor displacement and rotation. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(3):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjoreski H, Ciliberto M, Morales FJO, Roggen D, Mekki S, Valentin S (2017) A versatile annotated dataset for multimodal locomotion analytics with mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems, SenSys ’17, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM, pp 61:1–61:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze K, Lukowicz P (2014) Sensor placement variations in wearable activity recognition. IEEE Pervasive Comput 13(4):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara Oscar D, Labrador Miguel A (2013) A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(3):1192–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart JW, Weiss GM, Xue JC, Gallagher ST, Grosner AB, Pulickal TT (2011) Design considerations for the WISDM smart phone-based sensor mining architecture. In: Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on knowledge discovery from sensor data, SensorKDD ’11, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Micucci D, Mobilio M, Napoletano P (2017) UniMiB SHAR: a dataset for human activity recognition using acceleration data from smartphones. Appl Sci 7(10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofli F et al (2013) Berkeley MHAD: a comprehensive multimodal human action database. In: 2013 IEEE WACV, pp 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggen D, Calatroni A, Rossi M, Holleczek T, Förster K, Tröster G, Lukowicz P, Bannach D, Pirkl G, Ferscha A, Doppler J, Holzmann C, Kurz M, Holl G, Chavarriaga R, Sagha H, Bayati H, Creatura M, Millan JR (2010) Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In: 2010 seventh international conference on networked sensing systems (INSS), pp 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz C, Pan S, Bannis A, Chen X, Joe-Wong C, Noh HY, Zhang P (2018) IDrone: robust drone identification through motion actuation feedback. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2(2):80:1–80:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stisen A, Blunck H, Bhattacharya S, Prentow TS, Kjærgaard MB, Dey A, Sonne T, Jensen MM (2015) Smart devices are different: assessing and mitigating mobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems, SenSys ’15, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM, pp 127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda S, Lago P, Okita T, Inoue S (2018) A multi-sensor setting activity recognition simulation tool. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM international joint conference and 2018 international symposium on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and wearable computers, UbiComp ’18, New York, NY, USA, 2018. ACM, pp 1444–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustev YE, Incel OD, Ersoy C (2013) User, device and orientation independent human activity recognition on mobile phones: challenges and a proposal. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, UbiComp ’13 Adjunct, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM, pp 1427–1436

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenberg M, Lukowicz P, Kjaergaard MB, Blunck H, Grønbæk K, Franke T, Bouvin NO (2013) On heterogeneity in mobile sensing applications aiming at representative data collection. In: UbiComp ’13 Adjunct proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication. ACM, pp 1087–1098

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2009) Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on interactive multimedia for consumer electronics, IMCE ’09, New York, NY, USA. ACM, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AD, Ling MJ, Arvind DK (2011) IMUSim: a simulation environment for inertial sensing algorithm design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE IPSN, pp 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurtman A, Barshan B, Fidan B (2018) Activity recognition invariant to wearable sensor unit orientation using differential rotational transformations represented by quaternions. Sensors 18(8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Lago .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lago, P., Takeda, S., Okita, T., Inoue, S. (2019). MEASURed: Evaluating Sensor-Based Activity Recognition Scenarios by Simulating Accelerometer Measures from Motion Capture. In: Kawaguchi, N., Nishio, N., Roggen, D., Inoue, S., Pirttikangas, S., Van Laerhoven, K. (eds) Human Activity Sensing. Springer Series in Adaptive Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13001-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13001-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13000-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13001-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics