iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6287-4_2
Automatic Expansion of a Social Network Using Sentiment Analysis | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Automatic Expansion of a Social Network Using Sentiment Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Mining for Social Network Data

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 12))

Abstract

In this chapter, we present an approach to learn a signed social network automatically from online news articles. The vertices in this network represent people and the edges are labeled with the polarity of the attitudes among them (positive, negative, and neutral). Our algorithm accepts as its input two social networks extracted via unsupervised algorithms: (1) a small signed network labeled with attitude polarities (see Tanev, Proceedings of the MMIES’2007 Workshop Held at RANLP’2007, Borovets, Bulgaria. pp. 33–40, 2007) and (2) a quotation network, without attitude polarities, consisting of pairs of people where one person makes a direct speech statement about another person (see Pouliquen et al., Proceedings of the RANLP Conference, Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 487–492, 2007). The algorithm which we present here finds pairs of people who are connected in both networks. For each such pair (P1, P2) it takes the corresponding attitude polarity from the signed network and uses its polarity to label the quotations of P1 about P2. The obtained set of labeled quotations is used to train a Naïve Bayes classifier which then labels part of the remaining quotation network and adds it to the initial signed network. Since the social networks taken as the input are extracted in an unsupervised way, the whole approach including the acquisition of input networks is unsupervised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The system is restricted to only one person per quotation. It is assumed that the first person mentioned in the quotation is the main person to whom the quotation refers.

  2. 2.

    The original definition was actually formulated for directed graphs and made use of the notion of “semi-cycle”, that is a closed directed walk of at least three nodes on the graph which is traversed ignoring the direction of the edges.

  3. 3.

    Namely, if (v i , v k ) and (v j , v k ) are both positive, we enforce “+” on (v i , v j ), while if (v i , v k ) and (v j , v k ) have conflicting signs, then we enforce “–” on (v i , v j ).

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R., and Xu, Y. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In Proceedings of World-Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 529–535, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allison, B. Sentiment detection using lexically-based classifiers. In To Appear in Proceedings of TSD’2008 Brno, Czech Republic, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alrahabi, M. and Desclés, J.P. Automatic annotation of direct reported speech in Arabic and French, according to semantic map of enunciative modalities. In Proceedings of GoTAL conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 40–51, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crockett, W.H. Inferential rules in the learning and recall of patterns of sentiments. Journal of Personality, 47(4):658–676, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., and Pennock, D.M. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of World-Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 519–528, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, J.A. Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 30:181–187, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, J.A. The Davis/Holland/Leinhardt studies: An overview. In P.W. Holland and S. Leinhardt (eds), Perspectives on Social Network Research, New York, NY: Academic, pp. 51–62, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Efron, M. Cultural orientation: Classifying subjective documents by cociation [sic] analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music, and Design, Washington, DC, pp. 41–48, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatzivassiloglou, V. and McKeown, K. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the Joint ACL/EACL Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 174–181, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzivassiloglou, V. and Wiebe, J. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 299–305, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, S.M. and Hovy, E.H. Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL conference, New York, NY, pp. 200–207,2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knoke, D. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krestel, R., Witte, R., and Bergler, S. Minding the source: Automatic tagging of reported speech in newspaper articles. In Proceedings of LREC conference, Marrakech, Morocco, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mihalcea, R., Banea, C., and Wiebe, J. Learning multilingual subjective language via cross-lingual projections. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 976–983, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Montejo-Ráez, A., Ureña-López, L.A., and Steinberger, R. Text categorization using bibliographic records: Beyond document content. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 35: 119–126, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mullen, T. and Malouf, R. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research, 18:177–190, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pang, B. and Lee, L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2):1–135, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pang, B., Lee, L., and Vaithyanathan, V. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Morristown, NJ, pp. 79–86, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pouliquen, B., Steinberger, R., and Best, C. Automatic detection of quotations in multilingual news. In Proceedings of the RANLP Conference, Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 487–492, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pouliquen, B., Tanev, H., and Atkinson, M. Extracting and learning social networks out of multilingual news. In Proceedings of the SocNet workshop, Skalica, Slovakia, pp. 13–16, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riloff, E. and Wiebe, J. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Morristown, NJ, pp. 105–112, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberger, R., Pouliquen, B., and Ignat, C. Using language-independent rules to achieve high multilinguality in Text Mining. In F. Fogelman-Soulié, D. Perrotta, J. Piskorski and R. Steinberger (eds). Mining Massive Data Sets for Security, pp. 217–240. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanev, H. Unsupervised learning of social networks from a multiple-source news corpus. In Proceedings of the MMIES’2007 Workshop Held at RANLP’2007, Borovets, Bulgaria. pp. 33–40, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Turney, P. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 417–424, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., and Hwa, R. Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. Computational Intelligence, 22(2):73–99, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, B., Cheung, W., and Liu, J. Community mining from signed social networks. Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10:1333–1348, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, H. and Hatzivassiloglou, V. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Morristown, NJ, 129–136, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the whole team working on the Europe Media Monitor for providing the valuable news data. Their research and programming effort laid the foundation which made this experimental work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hristo Tanev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tanev, H., Pouliquen, B., Zavarella, V., Steinberger, R. (2010). Automatic Expansion of a Social Network Using Sentiment Analysis. In: Memon, N., Xu, J., Hicks, D., Chen, H. (eds) Data Mining for Social Network Data. Annals of Information Systems, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6287-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics