Abstract
The Empire and the papacy represented the unity of Latin Christendom. As temporal head of Christianity, however, the emperor did not enjoy the same stability in his position of leadership as the pope. An emperor, for example, only held office for roughly half the years elapsed between 962 and 1493, as long vacancies interrupted the chain of emperors. Moreover, the concept of empire was in constant flux. Contrary to the papacy, which was defined by a corpus of canonical laws and conciliar decrees, the Empire was shaped by collective memory and by individual interpretation. The concept of Empire varied according to the knowledge held of the Empire of antiquity. Some authors characterized the office of emperor as an exclusively temporal authority which had been established by Augustus. Others emphasized the Christian duties of the emperor, referring to the famous penance of the emperor Theodosius I in front of Ambrosius of Milan. In Rome, the concept of the emperor as head of the city itself had never truly died out. Equally, a king was also referred to as emperor in Spain and in England, if he dominated other kings in his region. Yet, in spite of this erratic concept of empire, it inspired a philosophic discussion about the necessity of a political world order. This discussion emerged especially in the late Middle Ages and anticipated early modern theories about supranational institutions and the deficiency of nation-states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Dante (1998) Monarchia, ed. Kay R. Studies and texts, 131. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto
Engelbert of Admont (2000) De ortu et fine Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada, ed. Izbicki ThM, Nederman CJ. Thoemmes, Bristol/Sterling
Konrad of Megenberg (1914) De translacione Romani imperii. In: Scholz R, Unbekannte kirchenpolitische Streitschriften aus der Zeit Ludwigs des Bayern (1327–1354), vol 2. Loescher, Rom, pp 249–345
Lupold of Bebenburg (2004) Politische Schriften des Lupold von Bebenburg, ed. Miethke J, Flӱeler C. MGH Staatsschriften, vol 4. Hahnsche Buchhandlung, Hannover
Marsilius of Padua (1993) Writings on the empire: Defensor minor and De translatione imperii, ed. Nederman CJ. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Nicholas of Cusa (1996) De concordantia catholica, ed. Sigmund PE. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Peter of Andlau (1998) Libellus de caesarea monarchia, ed. Müller RA. Insel, Frankfurt
Piccolomini Aeneas Silivus (2000) De ortu et auctoritate Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada, ed. Izbicki ThM, Nederman CJ. Thoemmes, Bristol/Sterling
Roselli Antonio (1612) Monarchia. In: Goldast M, Monarchia S. Romani imperii, vol 1. Biermann, Hannover, pp 252–556
William of Ockham (1956/1963/1974/1997) Opera politica, vols 1–4, ed. Offler HS. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1956/1963/1974); Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)
Secondary Sources
Burns JH (1992) Lordship, kingship and empire. The idea of monarchy, 1400–1525. Clarendon, Oxford
Cheneval F (2002) Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Bedeutung. Über die Entstehung und die philosophischen Grundlagen des supranationalen Denkens der Moderne. Schwabe, Basel
Davis CT (1957) Dante and the idea of Rome. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hageneder O (1985) Weltherrschaft im Mittelalter. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 93:257–278
Jones Ch (2007) Eclipse of empire? Perceptions of the western empire and its rulers in late-medieval France. Brepols, Turnhout
McCready WD (1974a) The problem of empire in Augustinus Triumphus and late medieval papal hierocratic theory. Traditio 30:325–349
McGrade AS (1974b) The political thought of William of Ockham. Personal and institutional principles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nederman C (1995) From Defensor pacis to Defensor minor: the problem of empire in Marsiglio of Padua. Hist Polit Thought 16:313–329
Nederman C (2005) Empire and the historiography of European political thought: Marsiglio of Padua, Nicholas of Cusa, and the medieval/modern divide. J Hist Ideas 66:1–15
Pennington K (1993) The prince and the law, 1200–1600: sovereignty and rights in the western legal tradition. University of California Press, Berkeley/Oxford
Post G (1964) Studies in medieval legal thought. Public law and the state 1100–1323. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Scales L (2001) Monarchy and German identity in the later Middle Ages. Bull John Rylands Univ Libr Manch 83:167–200
Ubl K (2006) Die Rechte des Kaisers in der Theorie deutscher Gelehrter des 14. Jahrhunderts (Engelbert von Admont, Lupold von Bebenburg, Konrad von Megenberg). In: Märtl C (ed) Konrad von Megenberg (1309–1374). Das Wissen der Zeit. C.H. Beck, München, pp 353–387
Walther HG (2003) Das Reich in der politischen Theorie der Legistik und im Umkreis der päpstlichen Kurie. In: Werner M (ed) Heinrich Raspe – Landgraf von Thüringen und römischer König (1227–1247). Fürsten, König und Reich in spätstaufischer Zeit. Lang, Frankfurt, pp 29–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ubl, K. (2011). Roman Empire. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_452
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_452
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law