Abstract
Traditionally, software processes improvement (SPI) has been approached. from a problem-oriented perspective, focusing on diagnosing and solving problems using methods such as the IDEAL model and DMAIC. In contrast, appreciative inquiry is an approach that focuses on what is best in an organization in order to further develop this to create a better future. It is, therefore, interesting to explore if and how software organizations familiar with problem-solving approaches can benefit from using appreciative inquiry. In this paper, we present an action research study conducted at the telecom company Ericsson in Sweden. Appreciative inquiry was used to facilitate an SPI initiative implementing a new process and tool for requirements and test case management. While the SPI initiative was considered successful, important lessons were learned regarding the application of appreciative inquiry. We conclude that the use of appreciative inquiry does not eliminate the dependence of other well-known key factors for SPI success. Also, the study indicates that the preference and satisfaction of problem-solving among individuals familiar with problem-oriented approaches may impede the use of appreciative inquiry.
All authors have made an equal contribution to the paper and are listed in alphabetic order.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamsson, P. “Is Management Commitment a Necessity After All in III: Software Process Improvement?,” Euromicro’ 00, Maastricht, The Netherlands, IEEE Computer Society, 2000, pp. 246–253.
Abrahamsson, P. “Rethinking the Concept of Commitment in Software Process Improvement.,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (13), 2001, pp. 69–98.
Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. “Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement,” MIS Quarterly (13:1), 1989, pp. 53–63.
Bartunek, J. M., and Louis, M. R. Insider/Outsider Team Research (Qualitative Research Methods), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
Baskerville, R., and Wood-Harper, T. “A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Information Technology (11), 1996, pp. 235–246.
Breyfogle, F. W. Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods (2nd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003.
Bushe, G. R. “Advances in Appreciative Inquiry as an Organization Development Intervention,” Organization Development Journal (13:3), 1995, pp. 14–22.
Börjesson, A. Making Software Process Improvement Happen, PhD Thesis, IT University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden, 2006.
Börjesson, A., and Mathiassen, L. “Successful Process Implementation,” IEEE Software (21:4), 2004, pp. 36–44.
Coghlan, D., and Brannick, T. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
Cooperrider, D. L. Appreciative Inquiry: Toward a Methodology for Understanding and Enhancing Organizational Innovation,” unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1986.
Cooperrider, D. L., Barrett, F., and Srivastva, S. “Social Construction and Appreciative Inquiry: A Journey in Organizational Theory,” in D. Hosking, P. Dachler, and K. Gergen (eds.), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism, Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 1995, pp. 157–200.
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., and Stavros, J. M. The Appreciative Inquiry Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Dybå, T. “An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement,” Empirical Software Engineering (5), 2000, pp. 357–390.
Fichman, R. G., and Kemerer, C. F. “The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps,” Information Systems Research (10:3), 1999, pp. 255–275.
Grady, R. B. Successful Software Process Improvement, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
Humphrey, W. S. Managing the Software Process, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1989.
Mathiassen, L. “Collaborative Practice Research,” Information, Technology & People (14:4), 2002, pp. 321–345.
McFeeley, B. IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement, The Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, 1996.
Newman, M., and Robey, D. “A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1992, pp. 249–266.
Pande, P., Nueman, R., and Cavanagh, R. The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their Performance, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Patton, M. Q. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
Paulk, M. C., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., and Chrissis, M. B. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.), New York: Free Press, 2003.
Susman, G., and Evered, R. “An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research,” Administrative Science Quarterly (23), 1978, pp. 582–603.
Weick, K. E., and Quinn, R. E. “Organizational Change and Development,” Annual Review of Psychology (50), 1999, pp. 361–386.
Weinberg, G. M. Quality Software Management, Volume IV — Anticipating Change, New York: Dorset House Publishing, 1997.
Wiegers, K. E. “Software Process Improvement: Eight Traps to Avoid, Cross Talk,” The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, September 1998, pp. 9–12.
Yin, R. Case Study Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Börjesson, A., Holmberg, L., Holmström, H., Nilsson, A. (2007). Use of Appreciative Inquiry in Successful Process Improvement. In: McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda. TDIT 2007. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 235. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72803-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72804-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)