iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30162-4_112
Directed Perfect Phylogeny (Binary Characters) | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Directed Perfect Phylogeny (Binary Characters)

1991; Gusfield

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Algorithms

Keywords and Synonyms

Directed binary character compatibility          

Problem Definition

Let \( { S = \{s_1,s_2,\dots,s_n\} } \) be a set of elements called objects, and let \( { C = \{c_1,c_2,\dots,c_m\} } \) be a set of functions from S to \( { \{0,1\} } \) called characters. For each object \( { s_i \in S } \) and character \( { c_j \in C } \), it is said that s i has c j if \( { c_j(s_i) = 1 } \) or that s i does not have c j if \( { c_j(s_i) = 0 } \), respectively (in this sense, characters are binary). Then the set S and its relation to C can be naturally represented by a matrix M of size \( { (n \times m) } \) satisfying \( { M[i,j] = c_j(s_i) } \) for every \( { i \in \{1,2,\dots,n\} } \) and \( { j \in \{1,2,\dots,m\} } \). Such a matrix M is called a binary character state matrix.

Next, for each \( s_i \in S \), define the set \( C_{s_i} = \{c_j \in C \colon s_i {\text{\ has\ }} c_j\} \). A phylogeny for S is a tree whose leaves are bijectively labeled by S, and a directed perfect...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that Theorem 4 does not contradict Theorem 3; in fact, Gusfield's lower bound argument considers an input matrix consisting mostly of 1's.

  2. 2.

    When this requirement is too strict, one can relax it to permit errors; for example, let characters be associated with more than one edge in the phylogeny (i. e., allow each character to emerge many times) but minimize the total number of associations (Camin–Sokal optimization), or keep the requirement that each character emerges only once but allow it to be lost multiple times (Dollo parsimony) [4,5]

Recommended Reading

  1. Agarwala, R., Fernández-Baca, D., Slutzki, G.: Fast algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. J. Comput. Biol. 2, 397–407 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Estabrook, G.F., Johnson, C.S., Jr., McMorris, F.R.: An algebraic analysis of cladistic characters. Discret. Math. 16, 141–147 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Estabrook, G.F., Johnson, C.S., Jr., McMorris, F.R.: A mathematical foundation for the analysis of cladistic character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 29, 181–187 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Felsenstein, J.: Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Baca, D.: The Perfect Phylogeny Problem. In: Cheng, X., Du, D.-Z. (eds.) Steiner Trees in Industry, pp. 203–234. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gusfield, D.M.: Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. Networks 21, 19–28 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gusfield, D.M.: Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences. Cambridge University Press, New York (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanisch, D., Zimmer, R., Lengauer, T.: ProML – the Protein Markup Language for specification of protein sequences, structures and families. In: Silico Biol. 2, 0029 (2002). http://www.bioinfo.de/isb/2002/02/0029/

  9. Kanj, I.A., Nakhleh, L., Xia, G.: Reconstructing evolution of natural languages: Complexity and parametrized algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Computing and Combinatorics Conference (COCOON 2006). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4112, pp. 299–308. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McMorris, F.R.: On the compatibility of binary qualitative taxonomic characters. Bull. Math. Biol. 39, 133–138 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Setubal, J.C., Meidanis, J.: Introduction to Computational Molecular Biology. PWS Publishing Company, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by Kyushu University, JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science), and INRIA Lille - Nord Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Jansson, J. (2008). Directed Perfect Phylogeny (Binary Characters). In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30162-4_112

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics