iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58266-5_9
Strategic interaction in oligopolistic markets — experimenting with real and artificial agents | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Strategic interaction in oligopolistic markets — experimenting with real and artificial agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Social Systems (MAAMAW 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 830))

Abstract

Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) concepts and ideas are used to model dynamic strategic interaction among producers in oligopolistic markets. Results of a laboratory experiment with human agents in the role of duopolists were used to design an architecture of artificial agents. A system in which these artificially intelligent agents interact as duopolists in a market environment was implemented and tested. The artificial agents exhibit some of the learning and adaptive capabilities observed in human subjects and the system is able to reproduce the overall pattern of interaction of the laboratory experiments. Results so far encourage us to think that the implementation of a computational test-bench for research in economic strategic interaction based in DAI techniques is possible and may contribute to theoretic progress in economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARTHUR, W.B.“Learning and Adaptive Economic Behavior — Designing Economic Agents that Act Like Human Agents: a Behavioral Approach to Bounded Rationality”. The American Economic Review. Vol.81, n.2. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERLIN, E.. “ The Theory of Monopolistic Competition”. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • COELHO, H.; GASPAR, G.; RAMOS, I. “Experiments in Modelling Communication among Autonomous Agents”. Proceedings of I.F.I.P. WG 8.3 Working Conference on Decision Support Systems.Fontainebleu (France), 1–3 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • CYERT, R.M.; MARCH J.G. “Processus de décision dans l'entreprise”. Dunod. Paris. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDMAN, M. “Essays in Positive Economics”. University of Chicago Press. 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • GASPAR, G. “Communication and Belief Changes in a Society of Agents”. Proceedings of the Fifth Rocky Mountain Conference on Pragmatics in A.I.,Las Cruces (U.S.A.), June 28–30, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • GASPAR, G.; COELHO, H. “A Modular Architecture for Agents Living in Society”. INESC Research Report. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLLAND, J.H.; MILLER, J. H. “Artificial Adaptive Agents In Economic Theory”. The American Economic Review. Vol.81, n. 2. May 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARIMON, R.; McGRATTAN E.; SARGENT, T.J.. “Money as a Medium of Exchange in an Economy With Artificially Intelligent Agents.”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. n. 14. pp. 329–373. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, R. M.. “Markets as Logic Programs”. Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management. L. F. PAU (Editor). Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland). 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, R. M. “On distributing the Intelligence of Economic Processes”. L'Èconomique et L'Intelligence Artificielle. Conference Internationale IFAC. Aug. 31–Sep. 4 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTEIRO, J. C. “Model of a Society of Intelligent Systems” (in Portuguese). LNEC Report. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • PLOTT, C. R.. “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Science”. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 20. pp 1485–1527. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • SERNADAS, C.; COELHO, H.; GASPAR, G.. “Communicating Knowledge Systems: Big Talk among Small Systems”, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, nos. 3–4, pp. 233–260 and 315–335. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, V. L.; WILLIAMS, A. W.; BRATTON, W. K.; VANNONI, M. G.. “Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs. Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 72. pp 58–77. 1982a.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, V. L.. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 72. pp 923–955. 1982b.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAR, S. “Trader: A Knowledge-Based System for Trading in Markets”. L'Èconomique et L'Intelligence Artificielle. Conference Internationale IFAC. Aug. 31–Sep. 4 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • TVERSKY, A.; KAHNEMAN D. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions” in HOGARTH, R.M., REDER, M. (ed.).“Rational Choice — The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology”. The University of Chicago Press. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Cristiano Castelfranchi Eric Werner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caldas, J.C., Coelho, H. (1994). Strategic interaction in oligopolistic markets — experimenting with real and artificial agents. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds) Artificial Social Systems. MAAMAW 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58266-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58266-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58266-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48589-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics