iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56039-4_54
Semantic information connected with data | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Semantic information connected with data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Theory — ICDT '92 (ICDT 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 646))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Informational capability of an attribute set is defined as the set of generated propositions. General data structures (comprising the set construct, tuple construct, functional as well as relational view) are compared for their informational capability using the definability relation. Relations of distinguishing capability (<dc) and comparison based on cardinality (≤bc) are defined on the set of attributes and examined with respect to the informational capability. Equivalent transformation of a database schema is defined and we prove that the general object-function schema can be equivalently transformed into a schema containing only unary (flat) attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.P.Barendregt: The Lambda-Calculus. North Holland, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.Beeri, P.A.Bernstein, N.Goodman: A sophisticate's introduction to database normalization theory. Proc. VLDB 1978, pp.113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.Carnap, Y.Bar-Hillel: An Outline of the Theory of Semantic Information. Technical Report No. 247, MIT Research Laboratory in Electronics, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Church: A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types. J. Symb. Logic, 5,1,1940, pp. 337–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.Duží, F.Krejčí, P.Materna, Z.Staníček: HIT Method of Database Design. Research Report Technical University of Brno, Prague 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.Duží, P.Materna: Attributes: Distinguishing Capability versus Informational Capability. Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, 1990, 2, pp. 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.Duží: Applying HIT approach in an application system design. Proc. KNVVT WG-25, 1989, pp. 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.Duží: Logic & Data Semantics. Dissertation, Ins. of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.Hammer, D.McLeod; Database Description with SDM: A Semantic database model. ACM Trans. Database Systems, 6 (1981), pp. 351–386.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Hull, R. King: Semantic database modelling: Survey, applications and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 13, 1987, pp. 202–260.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.Hull: Relative information capacity of simple relational database schemata. SIAM J. Comput, 15,3,1986, pp. 856–886.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.Hull, M.Yoshikawa: On the equivalence of database restructurings involving object identifiers. Submitted for PODS'91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.Hull, Ch.K.Yap: The Format Model: A theory of database organization. J. of the Association for Comp. Machinery, 31,3, 1984, pp. 518–537.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R.King, D.McLeod: A Database design methodology and tool for information systems. ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 3 (1985), pp. 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.Klug: Entity-relationship views over uninterpreted enterprise schemas. Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, P.P.Chen, ed., North-Holland, Amsterodam, 1980, pp. 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y.E.Lien: On the semantics of the entity-relationship model. Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, P.P.Chen, ed., North-Holland, Amsterodam, 1980, pp. 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.W.Ling, F.W.Tompa, T.Kameda: An improved third normal form for relational databases. ACM Trans. Database Systems, 6 (1981), pp. 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.Maier, A.O.Mendelzon, F.Sadri, J.D.Ullman: Adequacy of decomposition of relational databases. J.Comp. Systems Sci., 21 (1980), pp. 368–379.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.H.Scholl, H.-J.Schek: A Relational Object Model. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Database Theory ICDT'90, Paris, Dec. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Tichý: The Logic of Temporal Discourse. Linguistic and Philosophy, 3, 1980, pp. 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Tichý: The Foundations of Fiege's Logic. de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.D. Ullman: Principles of Database and Knowledge Base Systems. Computer Science Press, Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V.Vianu: Dynamic Functional Dependences and Database Aging. J. of the Association for Comp. Machinery, 34,1, 1987, pp. 28–59.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.B.Yao, V.Waddle, B.C.Housel: View modelling and integration using the functional data model. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., SE-8, 6 (1982), pp. 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Zlatuska: Data Bases and the Lambda Calculus. Proc. IFIP'86 World Computer Congress, Dublin, 1986, pp. 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joachim Biskup Richard Hull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duží, M. (1992). Semantic information connected with data. In: Biskup, J., Hull, R. (eds) Database Theory — ICDT '92. ICDT 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 646. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56039-4_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56039-4_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56039-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47360-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics