iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_175
The use of proof plans to sum series | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The use of proof plans to sum series

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction—CADE-11 (CADE 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe a program for finding closed form solutions to finite sums. The program was built to test the applicability of the proof planning search control technique in a domain of mathematics outwith induction. This experiment was successful. The series summing program extends previous work in this area and was built in a short time just by providing new series summing methods to our existing inductive theorem proving system CLAM.

One surprising discovery was the usefulness of the ripple tactic in summing series. Rippling is the key tactic for controlling inductive proofs, and was previously thought to be specialised to such proofs. However, it turns out to be the key sub-tactic used by all the main tactics for summing series. The only change required was that it had to be supplemented by a difference matching algorithm to set up some initial meta-level annotations to guide the rippling process. In inductive proofs these annotations are provided by the application of mathematical induction. This evidence suggests that rippling, supplemented by difference matching, will find wide application in controlling mathematical proofs.

The research reported in this paper was supported by SERC grant GR/F/71799, a SERC PostDoctoral Fellowship to the first author and a SERC Senior Fellowship to the third author. We would like to thank the other members of the mathematical reasoning group for their feedback on this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.S. Boyer and J.S. Moore. A Computational Logic. Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bundy. The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs. In R. Lusk and R. Overbeek, editors, 9th Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 111–120, Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, C. Horn, and A. Smaill. The Oyster-Clam system. In M.E. Stickel, editor, 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 647–648, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, J. Hesketh, and A. Smaill. Experiments with proof plans for induction. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 7:303–324, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, A. Smaill, and A. Ireland. Extensions to the rippling-out tactic for guiding inductive proofs. In M.E. Stickel, editor, 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 132–146, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Basin and T. Walsh. Difference Matching. In D. Kapur, editor, 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.L. Constable, S.F. Allen, H.M. Bromley, et al. Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Clarke and X. Zhao. Analytica — A Theorem Prover for Mathematica. Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.W. Gosper. Indefinite hypergeometric sums in MACSYMA. In Proc. MAC-SYMA Users Conference, pages 237–252, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Hutter. Guiding inductive proofs. In M.E. Stickel, editor, 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 147–161, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Sterling, A. Bundy, L. Byrd, R. O'Keefe, and B. Silver. Solving symbolic equations with PRESS. J. Symbolic Computation, 7:71–84, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Deepak Kapur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Walsh, T., Nunes, A., Bundy, A. (1992). The use of proof plans to sum series. In: Kapur, D. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-11. CADE 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_175

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_175

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55602-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47252-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics