iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_6
Evaluating Quality of Conceptual Models Based on User Perceptions | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Evaluating Quality of Conceptual Models Based on User Perceptions

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006 (ER 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents the development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling applying the model of DeLone and McLean [6] for evaluating information systems in general. Given the growing awareness about the importance of high-quality conceptual models, it is surprising that there is no practical evaluation framework that considers the quality of conceptual models from a user’s perspective. Human factors research in conceptual modeling is still scarce and the perception of quality by model users has been largely ignored. A first research goal is therefore to determine what the appropriate dimensions are for evaluating conceptual models from a user’s perspective. Secondly, we investigate the relationships between these dimensions. Furthermore, we present the results of two experiments with 187 and 124 business students respectively, designed to test the proposed model and the generated hypotheses. The results largely support the developed model and have implications for both theory and practice of quality evaluation of conceptual models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basili, V., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building Knowledge through Families of Ex-periments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4), 456–473 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., Weber, R.: Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research 12(4), 384–405 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen, K.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, NY (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton-Jones, A., Weber, R.: Understanding Relationships with Attributes in Entity-Relationship Diagrams. In: Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 214–228 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, F.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information Systems Success: The Quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Journal 3(1), 60–95 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H.M.: Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 269–277 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn, C.L., Grabski, S.V.: Perceived semantic expressiveness of accounting systems and task accuracy effects. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 1(2), 79–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, C.L., Grabski, S.V.: An investigation of localization as an element of cognitive fit in accounting model representations. Decision Science 32(1), 55–94 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Foundations for Empirical Comparisons of Conceptual Modeling Techniques. In: Batra, D., Parsons, J., Ramesh, E. (eds.) Proc. of the Second Annual Symposium on Research in Systems Analysis and Design, Miami, Florida (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Complexity and Clarity in Conceptual Modeling: Comparison of Mandatory and Optional Properties. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55(3), 301–328 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 2nd edn. (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hulland, John: Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 20(2), 195–204 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G.: Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In: Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W., Olive, A. (eds.) Proc. of the 3rd IFIP8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems, Marburg, Germany, pp. 216–231 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moody, D.L.: Dealing with Complexity: A practical Method for representing Large Entity Relationship Models, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and Practical Issues in Evaluating the Quality of Conceptual Models: Current state and Future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55(3), 243–276 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting and Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A., Wixom, B.H.: Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4), 199–235 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parsons, J., Cole, L.: What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for the experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55(3), 327–342 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poels, G., Nelson, J., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: Quality in Conceptual Modeling. New Research Directions. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 243–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Poels, G., Maes, A., Gailly, F., Paemeleire, R.: Measuring the Perceived Semantic Quality of Information Models. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 376–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Rai, A., Lang, S.S., Welker, R.B.: Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research 13(1), 50–69 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seddon, P.: A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240–253 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seddon, P., Kiew, M.-Y.: A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In: DeGross, J.I., Huff, S.L., Munro, M.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, pp. 99–110 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seddon, P., Yip, S.-K.: An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software. Journal of Information Systems 6(1), 75–92 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Weber, R.: Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Communications of the ACM 46(10), 85–89 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1949)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Siau, K., Wand, Y., Benbasat, I.: The Relative Importance of Structural Constraints and Surface Semantics in Information Modeling. Information Systems 22(2/3), 155–170 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Topi, H., Ramesh, V.: Human Factors Research on Data Modeling: A Review of Prior Research, An Extended Framework and Future Research Directions. Journal of Database Management 13(2), 3–19 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maes, A., Poels, G. (2006). Evaluating Quality of Conceptual Models Based on User Perceptions. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics