iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/11533092_9
Inferring Trust | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Inferring Trust

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3487))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we discuss Liau’s logic of Belief, Inform and Trust (BIT), which captures the use of trust to infer beliefs from acquired information. However, the logic does not capture the derivation of trust from other notions. We therefore suggest the following two extensions. First, like Liau we observe that trust in information from an agent depends on the topic of the information. We extend BIT with a formalization of topics which are used to infer trust in a proposition from trust in another proposition, if both propositions have the same topics. Second, for many applications, communication primitives other than inform are required. We extend BIT with questions, and discuss the relationship with belief, inform and trust. An answer to a question can lead to trust, when the answer conforms to the beliefs of the agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan, Y.H., Thoen, W.: Formal aspects of a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. In: 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2000), p. 6006 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liau, C.J.: Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems – a modal formulation. Artificial Intelligence 149, 31–60 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gasquet, O., Herzig, A.: From classical to normal modal logics. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Proof Theory of Modal Logics. Applied Logic Series, vol. 2, pp. 293–311. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kracht, M., Wolter, F.: Normal monomodal logics can simulate all others. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 99–138 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Goffman, E.: Strategic interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demolombe, R.: To trust information sources: a proposal for a modal logical framework. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.H. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 111–124. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Demolombe, R., Jones, A.: On sentences of the kind “sentence ‘p’ is about topic t’. In: Logic, language and reasoning: Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, pp. 115–133. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Herzig, A., Longin, D.: Belief dynamics in cooperative dialogues. Journal of Semantics 17, 91–118 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janin, D., Walukiewicz, I.: Automata for the modal mu-calculus and related results. In: Hájek, P., Wiedermann, J. (eds.) MFCS 1995. LNCS, vol. 969, pp. 552–562. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Questions. In: Van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, North-Holland, pp. 1055–1124. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Kuppevelt, J.: Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31, 109–149 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, Y.H., Thoen, W.: An outline of a trust model for electronic commerce. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14, 849–862 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, F.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Trust, pp. 213–237. Basil Blackwell, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grosz, B., Sidner, C.: Attentions, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huibers, T.: An Axiomatic Theory for Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Utrecht University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burrows, M., Abadi, M., Needham, R.: A logic of authentication. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 8, 18–36 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tuecke, S.: The anatomy of the Grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15, 200–222 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carbone, M., Nielsen, M., Sassone, V.: A formal model for trust in dynamic networks. In: International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2003), pp. 54–63. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, A., Firozabadi, B.S.: On the characterisation of a trusting agent - aspects of a formal approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 157–168. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Lacy, J.: Decentralized trust management. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 164–173. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science 49, 1407–1424 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dastani, M., Herzig, A., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L. (2005). Inferring Trust. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11533092_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11533092_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28060-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31857-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics