Take the Tomato 2 Stops to the Sunflower

Off the Rails

The colors of the New York City subway map have been described as a rainbow. Turns out, they could also be described as a grove.

Tomato red.Tomato red.

The N, R, Q and W lines sport a shade called “sunflower yellow.” The Nos. 1, 2, and 3 trains use “tomato red.” And the No. 7 line, proudly purple, is actually a hue known as “raspberry.” (Those are usually heard on the 7 only when the Mets are having a bad day.)

Every shade in the subway color scheme has a secret name, known only to the handful of transit workers who oversee the system’s maps and signs. But on a recent visit to the New York City Transit sign shop in Brooklyn, Off The Rails was offered a glimpse at the palette.

The colors, which have stayed static since the map changed to its current design in 1979, are provided by an outside paint supplier for use on the system’s signs. Each shade has its own moniker.

The hue for the A, C and E lines is “vivid blue.” The Lexington Avenue line, which runs through the moneyed Upper East Side, has “apple green.” The L line is “slate gray,” and the J and Z lines are “terra cotta brown.”

Colors are assigned based on a subway route’s “trunk line” – that is, which avenue it runs along in Manhattan. (This might provide fodder to those who feel the city’s transit service is biased toward Manhattanites.)

The recent decision to re-route the M line up Avenue of the Americas, instead of its previous run into southern parts of Brooklyn, is why the route is about to lose its terra cotta tint. All lines along Sixth Avenue are “bright orange,” and the first circular M logos of that color have already been printed by the transit agency’s silkscreen machines.

Subway colors have shifted over time. The scheme now in place was adapted from the Modernist map by Massimo Vignelli in the early 1970s, an abstract masterpiece that was scrapped because its right angles left riders too confused.

Some of Mr. Vignelli’s colors were kept in place, according to Michael Hertz, the designer of the subsequent, less right-angled 1979 map. “We felt there was a familiarity already with dark blue on Eighth Avenue,” Mr. Hertz said in a recent interview.

But Mr. Hertz, whose firm is still in charge of maintaining the transportation authority’s maps, said he was skeptical of a few of his predecessor’s other choices. “His Lex colors were weak,” Mr. Hertz said. “One was a pink, one was a light gray.”


Our transit reporter, Michael M. Grynbaum, advises you on the latest chatter from the city’s roads and rails. Check back first thing every Monday morning. Got a tip? He can be reached at OffTheRails@nytimes.com.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

The colors chosen – and the care with which they are selected – rival that of the most driven car manufacturer marketing expensive paint finishes…

At the end of the day, though, knowing the reasoning behind the color changes does lend a hit of intuition to those of us still flummoxed by the sprawling monster known as the subway in NYC (yes, I mean us suburbanites who venture into the city, full of apprehension, who sometimes wuss out, and take a cab).

Interesting article. But this screen printer still has a copy edit! It’s not paint, but INK that is supplied for the making of the signs.

Why would they consider the names of the colors to be a secret?

Nothing exposes a tourist more quickly than if they refer to one of the subway lines by color as in: “Do I take the Green Line to Grand Central Station?”

As I’m fond of pointing out to such folk that — unlike places like DC and Boston — use of the NYC subway system requires at least an elementary degree of literacy and numeracy. Simple minded reference to colors doesn’t “cut it” here.

What’s so secret about the stock names of vinyl adhesive from 3M? Do a google search, all of those names match what’s in the 3M catalog. Were you told they were secret, or did you just assume?

“Do I take the Green Line to Grand Central Station?”

Two things make them a tourist, one the “Green Line” and two “Grand Central Station.” “Grand Central Station” never existed, it is Grand Central Terminal.

What about the ‘G’ line?

@6 — Sorry, Dan. I believe you are incorrect.

It’s is true that Metro North has a Grand Central Terminal because it’s trains originate or destinate there.

But the subway uses Grand Central Station because it is just a stop on the line which continues in both directions.

Mr. Grynbaum, what color is the G train? It’s the only one you didn’t mention. Then we’ll know all the colors.

Based on the 3M color chart mentioned above by pdm, the Lex. Ave. lines look more like Bright Green to me, with the G looking more like Apple Green. But then it’s hard to tell on a computer screen.

Count me in with the crowd that’s dying to know what the official name is for the G train’s green tone.
For years, I’ve dubbed it “Kermit Green”.
But I would believe lime green.

Makes one long for the day when it was just the IRT downtown, or the BMT to Brooklyn, or a Bronx-bound IND local. As these newfangled letters and numbers, dagnabit!

And yes, the subway stop at Grand Central on the Lex Ave IRT is Grand Central STATION. Just look at the signs the subway entrances. The Metro-North terminal is named as Grand Central TERMINAL, since trains don’t do thru but rather start and end their runs there..