Patty Shwartz

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Patty Shwartz
Image of Patty Shwartz
United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
Tenure

2013 - Present

Years in position

11

Education

Bachelor's

Rutgers University, 1983

Law

University of Pennsylvania Law School, 1986

Personal
Birthplace
Paterson, N.J.


Patty Shwartz is a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit. She joined the court in 2013 after being nominated by Barack Obama.[1]

Early life and education

A native of Paterson, New Jersey, Shaw earned her bachelor's degree from Rutgers College in 1983 and her J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1986.[1]

Professional career

  • 2002-2003: Chief, criminal division
  • 2001-2002: Executive assistant U.S. attorney
  • 1999-2001: Chief, criminal division
  • 1995-1999: Deputy chief, criminal civision
  • 1989-2003: Assistant U.S. attorney

Judicial career

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Patty Shwartz
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 562 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: October 5, 2011
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Well Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: February 15, 2012
QFRs: QFRs (Hover over QFRs to read more)
Renom. QFRs: Renom. QFRs
ApprovedAReported: February 14, 2013 March 8, 2012
ApprovedAConfirmed: April 19, 2013
ApprovedAVote: 64-34

Shwartz was nominated on October 5, 2011, by President Barack Obama to a post on the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit vacated by Judge Maryanne Trump Barry. The American Bar Association rated Shwartz Unanimously Well Qualified for the nomination.[2][3] Hearings on Shwartz's nomination were held before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on February 15, 2012, and her nomination was reported by U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on March 8, 2012. Under provisions of Rule XXXI, paragraph six of the standing rules of the Senate, Shwartz's nomination was returned to the president on January 3, 2013.[4] President Obama resubmitted Shwartz's nomination on January 4, 2013, and her nomination was reported by Sen. Leahy, without hearing, on February 14, 2013. Shwartz was confirmed on a recorded 64-34 vote of the U.S. Senate on April 9, 2013, and she received her commission the next day.[1][5]

District of New Jersey, magistrate

Shwartz was a federal magistrate judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey from 2003 until her confirmation to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2013.[1]

Noteworthy cases

Third Circuit upholds U.S. Tax Court ruling despite IRS error (2017)

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit (Rubel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue)

On March 16, 2017, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit affirmed a judgment of the United States Tax Court in Nancy Rubel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Judge Patty Shwartz delivered the opinion of the circuit panel.

The plaintiff in this case, Nancy Rubel, filed for relief in the United States Tax Court from a final determination of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that the plaintiff was liable for back taxes. Prior to submitting her court filing, the IRS sent Rubel a letter stating,[6]

Please be advised this correspondence doesn’t extend the time to file a petition with the U.S. Tax Court. Your time to petition the U.S. Tax Court began to run when we issued you our final determination on Jan. 04, 2016 and will end on Apr. 19, 2016. However, you may continue to work with us to resolve your tax matter.[7]

This information was sent to the plaintiff in error, as "the deadlines for Rubel to petition the Tax Court regarding the final determinations were April 4 and 12, 2016, not April 19, 2016."[6] Rubel filed a petition with the Tax Court on April 19, 2016, and the IRS moved to dismiss the case. The IRS claimed that because Rubel failed to file the petition within 90 days of the date of the notices of the IRS' final determination, the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction to review the petition. Rubel argued that the letter sent by the IRS with the incorrect information permitted the Tax Court to take jurisdiction in the case. The U.S. Tax Court held for the IRS and dismissed the lawsuit. A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Patty Shwartz, affirmed the Tax Court's decision.

Pennsylvania congressional map upheld

On January 10, 2018, a panel of federal judges in Pennsylvania dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's congressional map. The case concerns the congressional map passed by the Republican-controlled General Assembly in 2011. The plaintiffs alleged that the congressional map violated the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution. They claimed that the map was gerrymandered to ensure Republican control in many districts. By a 2-1 vote, the panel upheld the 2011 map. However, each judge on the panel wrote a separate opinion--the two judges in the majority did not agree on the reason for upholding the map. Judge Brooks Smith and Judge Patty Shwartz made up the majority. Judge Michael Baylson dissented.

Judge Smith would have ruled that the plaintiffs' claims were not within the court's power to resolve. He wrote, "The structural change Plaintiffs seek must come from the political branches or from the political process itself, not the courts. For these reasons, I would hold that the Elections Clause claim raises a non-justiciable political question."[8]

Judge Patty Shwartz agreed that the map should be upheld, but she would have ruled that the plaintiffs did not have standing to bring the case: "Plaintiffs lack standing to bring a statewide challenge to the map because they have not presented a plaintiff from each congressional district who has articulated a concrete and particularized injury in fact." However, she continued, even if the plaintiffs did have standing, "Their claim would still fail because the legal test they propose for an Elections Clause claim is inconsistent with established law."[9]

Finally, Judge Michael Baylson dissented. Baylson would have ruled that the map constituted unconstitutional gerrymandering. He wrote that while the United States Supreme Court had not previously ruled on a gerrymandering claim under the Elections Clause, he believed Supreme Court precedent had established standards for fair congressional maps. Under those standards, he wrote, he believed the plaintiffs had proved their case.[10]

See also

External links


Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
2013-Present
Succeeded by
-