{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,20]],"date-time":"2024-09-20T17:01:18Z","timestamp":1726851678449},"reference-count":76,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]],"date-time":"2023-06-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1686528000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]],"date-time":"2023-06-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1686528000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>The use of agile methodology has become widespread in organizations that previously relied on traditional or structured software development methods, such as the waterfall approach. Successful completion rates for agile initiatives are at 40%, whereas only 15% of waterfall projects were successfully completed. To take advantage of the benefits of each method, many organizations are using a hybrid approach that combines Agile with Waterfall and structured software development methodologies. Rather than asking which methodology is superior, it is more productive to determine which one is most effective for a particular project. Agile projects have a failure rate of 10%, while waterfall projects fail 30% of the time. This study aims to compare and contrast agile and waterfall methodologies in order to create a decision tree for selecting the most suitable method for a software development project. Several cases and scenarios are examined using the hybrid development approach. Despite many advantages of Agile methodologies, a combination approach may be necessary, as Waterfall may be required for certain projects or development phases. This study explores the feasibility of combining Waterfall and Agile methodologies in software development management.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]],"date-time":"2023-06-12T11:02:23Z","timestamp":1686567743000},"page":"1504-1522","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1275-2050","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alok","family":"Mishra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Yehia Ibrahim","family":"Alzoubi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"1958_CR1","unstructured":"AdobeTeam (2022) Project management\u2014agile versus waterfall. Adobe Experience Cloud Blog. https:\/\/business.adobe.com\/blog\/basics\/agile-vs-waterfall, viewed 23 October 2022 [Online]"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10515-022-00371-9","volume":"30","author":"M Ahmed","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ahmed M, Khan SUR, Alam KA (2023) An NLP-based quality attributes extraction and prioritization framework in agile-driven software development. Autom Softw Eng 30(1):7","journal-title":"Autom Softw Eng"},{"key":"1958_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aitken A (2014) Dual application model for agile software engineering. In: 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, USA. IEEE, pp 4789\u20134798","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2014.588"},{"issue":"4","key":"1958_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0264420","volume":"17","author":"I Alam","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alam I, Sarwar N, Noreen I (2022) Statistical analysis of software development models by six-pointed star framework. PLoS ONE 17(4):e0264420","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR5","first-page":"30","volume":"10","author":"F Almeida","year":"2019","unstructured":"Almeida F, Sim\u00f5es J (2019) Moving from waterfall to agile: perspectives from IT Portuguese companies. Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Technol (IJSSMET) 10(1):30\u201343","journal-title":"Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Technol (IJSSMET)"},{"issue":"11","key":"1958_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.3991\/ijim.v14i11.13269","volume":"14","author":"S Al-Saqqa","year":"2020","unstructured":"Al-Saqqa S, Sawalha S, AbdelNabi H (2020) Agile software development: methodologies and trends. Int J Interact Mob Technol 14(11):246\u2013270","journal-title":"Int J Interact Mob Technol"},{"key":"1958_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80269","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2020.2990389","volume":"8","author":"YI Alzoubi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Alzoubi YI, Gill AQ (2020) An empirical investigation of geographically distributed agile development: the agile enterprise architecture is a communication enabler. IEEE Access 8:80269\u201380289","journal-title":"IEEE Access"},{"issue":"4","key":"1958_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1109\/TPC.2021.3110396","volume":"64","author":"Y Alzoubi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Alzoubi Y, Gill A (2021) The critical communication challenges between geographically distributed agile development teams: empirical findings. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 64(4):322\u2013337","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Prof Commun"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s40171-022-00298-w","volume":"23","author":"YI Alzoubi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alzoubi YI, Gill AQ (2022) Can agile enterprise architecture be implemented successfully in distributed agile development? Empirical findings. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 23(2):221\u2013235","journal-title":"Glob J Flex Syst Manag"},{"issue":"6","key":"1958_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.17706\/\/jsw.10.6.681-694","volume":"10","author":"YI Alzoubi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alzoubi YI, Gill AQ, Al-Ani A (2015) Distributed agile development communication: an agile architecture driven framework. J Softw 10(6):681\u2013694","journal-title":"J Softw"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2015.08.003","volume":"53","author":"YI Alzoubi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alzoubi YI, Gill AQ, Al-Ani A (2016) Empirical studies of geographically distributed agile development communication challenges: a systematic review. Inf Manag 53(1):22\u201337","journal-title":"Inf Manag"},{"key":"1958_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171648","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2019.2953008","volume":"7","author":"G Ammad","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ammad G, Janjua UI, Madni TM, Cheema MF, Shahid AR (2019) An empirical study to investigate the impact of communication issues in GSD in Pakistan\u2019s IT industry. IEEE Access 7:171648\u2013171672","journal-title":"IEEE Access"},{"key":"1958_CR13","unstructured":"Ana (2022) Software development statistics. True List. https:\/\/truelist.co\/blog\/software-development-statistics\/, viewed 24 October 2022 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-019-00840-7","volume":"10","author":"G Arcos-Medina","year":"2019","unstructured":"Arcos-Medina G, Mauricio D (2019) Aspects of software quality applied to the process of agile software development: a systematic literature review. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10:867\u2013897","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag"},{"key":"1958_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bishop D, Deokar A (2014) Toward an understanding of preference for agile software development methods from a personality theory perspective. In: 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, USA. IEEE, pp 4749\u20134758","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2014.583"},{"key":"1958_CR16","unstructured":"Boersma E (2022) Is there a place for the waterfall methodology in 2021? Plutora.com. https:\/\/www.plutora.com\/blog\/waterfall-methodology, viewed 26 October 2022 [Online]"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1177\/2043886919870544","volume":"12","author":"K Chandran","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chandran K, Das Aundhe M (2022) Agile or waterfall development: the Clementon company dilemma. J Inf Technol Teach Cases 12(1):8\u201315","journal-title":"J Inf Technol Teach Cases"},{"key":"1958_CR18","unstructured":"DevFacto (2023) A hybrid software development method. https:\/\/www.devfacto.com\/blog\/a-hybrid-software-development-method, viewed 25 April 2023 [Online]"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.14254\/2071-8330.2018\/11-2\/21","volume":"11","author":"AM Dima","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dima AM, Maassen MA (2018) From waterfall to agile software: development models in the IT sector, 2006 to 2018. Impacts on company management. J Int Stud 11(2):315\u2013326","journal-title":"J Int Stud"},{"issue":"6","key":"1958_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1177\/8756972818798980","volume":"49","author":"T Dings\u00f8yr","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dings\u00f8yr T, Moe NB, Seim EA (2018) Coordinating knowledge work in multiteam programs: findings from a large-scale agile development program. Proj Manag J 49(6):64\u201377","journal-title":"Proj Manag J"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.18201\/ijisae.2022.265","volume":"10","author":"M Dursun","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dursun M, Goker N (2022) Evaluation of project management methodologies success factors using fuzzy cognitive map method: waterfall, agile, and lean six sigma cases. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng 10(1):35\u201343","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng"},{"key":"1958_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fagarasan C, Popa O, Pisla A, Cristea C (2021) Agile, waterfall and iterative approach in information technology projects. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Oradea, Romania. IOP Publishing, vol 1169, no 1, p 012025","DOI":"10.1088\/1757-899X\/1169\/1\/012025"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1109\/TPC.2019.2911461","volume":"62","author":"E Friess","year":"2019","unstructured":"Friess E (2019) Scrum language use in a software engineering firm: an exploratory study. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 62(2):130\u2013147","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Prof Commun"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1007\/s10796-016-9672-8","volume":"20","author":"AQ Gill","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gill AQ, Henderson-Sellers B, Niazi M (2018) Scaling for agility: a reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies. Inf Syst Front 20(2):315\u2013341","journal-title":"Inf Syst Front"},{"key":"1958_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.advengsoft.2022.103125","volume":"168","author":"N Govil","year":"2022","unstructured":"Govil N, Sharma A (2022) Validation of agile methodology as ideal software development process using fuzzy-TOPSIS method. Adv Eng Softw 168:103125","journal-title":"Adv Eng Softw"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR26","first-page":"29","volume":"10","author":"T Gustavsson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gustavsson T, Berntzen M, Stray V (2022) Changes to team autonomy in large-scale software development: a multiple case study of scaled agile framework (SAFe) implementations. Int J Inf Syst Proj Manag 10(1):29\u201346","journal-title":"Int J Inf Syst Proj Manag"},{"key":"1958_CR27","volume-title":"Management information systems for the information age","author":"S Haag","year":"2009","unstructured":"Haag S, Cummings M (2009) Management information systems for the information age, 9th edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York","edition":"9"},{"key":"1958_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Halani KR, Jhajharia K (2022) A quantitative study of waterfall and agile methodologies with the perspective of project management. In: Contemporary challenges for agile project management: IGI Global, pp 111\u2013133","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-7998-7872-8.ch007"},{"key":"1958_CR29","unstructured":"Hamilton T (2023) Agile vs waterfall\u2014difference between methodologies. https:\/\/www.guru99.com\/waterfall-vs-agile.html, viewed 25 April 2023 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hauck JCR, Vieira M (2021) Towards a guide for risk management integration in agile software projects. In: Yilmaz M, Clarke P, Messnarz R, Reiner M (eds) Systems, software and services process improvement. EuroSPI 2021. Communications in computer and information science. Springer, Cham, pp 73\u201387","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-85521-5_6"},{"key":"1958_CR31","unstructured":"Hoory L, Bottorff C (2022) Agile versus waterfall: which project management methodology is best for you? Forbes Advisor. https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/advisor\/business\/agile-vs-waterfall-methodology\/, viewed 23 October 2022 [Online]"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR32","first-page":"15","volume":"36","author":"M Hummel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hummel M, Rosenkranz C, Holten R (2015) The role of social agile practices for direct and indirect communication in information systems development teams. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 36(1):15","journal-title":"Commun Assoc Inf Syst"},{"key":"1958_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00e4pyaho M, Kauppinen M (2015) Agile requirements engineering with prototyping: a case study. In: 23rd International requirements engineering conference (RE), Ottawa, Canada. IEEE, pp 334\u2013343","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2015.7320450"},{"key":"1958_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kasauli R, Knauss E, Nakatumba-Nabende J, Kanagwa B (2020) Agile islands in a waterfall environment: challenges and strategies in automotive. In: Evaluation and assessment in software engineering, Trondheim, Norway. ACM, pp 31\u201340","DOI":"10.1145\/3383219.3383223"},{"key":"1958_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kassab M, DeFranco J, Neto VG (2018) An empirical investigation on the satisfaction levels with the requirements engineering practices: agile versus waterfall. In: International professional communication conference (ProComm), Toronto, Canada. IEEE, pp 118\u2013124","DOI":"10.1109\/ProComm.2018.00033"},{"key":"1958_CR36","unstructured":"Kavlakoglu E (2022) Which project management methodology should you use to manage your next project? IBM. https:\/\/www.ibm.com\/cloud\/blog\/agile-vs-waterfall, viewed 26 October 2022 [Online]"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.22581\/muet1982.2202.15","volume":"41","author":"AR Khan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Khan AR, Akbar R (2022) Software development process evolution and paradigm shift: a case study of Malaysian companies. Mehran Univ Res J Eng Technol 41(2):155\u2013171","journal-title":"Mehran Univ Res J Eng Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR38","first-page":"43","volume":"32","author":"LT Khoza","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khoza LT, Marnewick C (2020) Waterfall and agile information system project success rates: a South African perspective. S Afr Comput J 32(1):43\u201373","journal-title":"S Afr Comput J"},{"issue":"3","key":"1958_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.3390\/software1030015","volume":"1","author":"IK Kirpitsas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kirpitsas IK, Pachidis TP (2022) Evolution towards hybrid software development methods and information systems audit challenges. Software 1(3):316\u2013363","journal-title":"Software"},{"key":"1958_CR40","unstructured":"KnowledgeHut (2023) Agile transformation and its challenges. https:\/\/www.knowledgehut.com\/blog\/agile\/agile-transformation-and-challenges, viewed 24 April 2023 [Online]"},{"issue":"3","key":"1958_CR41","first-page":"7013","volume":"6","author":"MK Kodmelwar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kodmelwar MK, Futane PR, Pawar SD, Lokhande SA, Dhanure SP (2022) A comparative study of software development waterfall, spiral and agile methodology. J Posit Sch Psychol 6(3):7013\u20137017","journal-title":"J Posit Sch Psychol"},{"key":"1958_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar G, Bhatia PK (2014) Comparative analysis of software engineering models from traditional to modern methodologies. In: 4th international conference on advanced computing & communication technologies, Rohtak, India. IEEE, pp 189\u2013196","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCT.2014.73"},{"key":"1958_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00fcpper S, Rausch A, Andelfinger U (2018) Towards the systematic development of hybrid software development processes. In: International Conference on Software and System Process. ACM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 157\u2013161","DOI":"10.1145\/3202710.3203158"},{"key":"1958_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuusinen K, Gregory P, Sharp H, Barroca L (2016) Strategies for doing agile in a non-agile environment. In: 10th ACM\/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, Ciudad Real, Spain. ACM, pp 1\u20136","DOI":"10.1145\/2961111.2962623"},{"issue":"2","key":"1958_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.3390\/su15021121","volume":"15","author":"J Leong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Leong J, May Yee K, Baitsegi O, Palanisamy L, Ramasamy RK (2023) Hybrid project management between traditional software development lifecycle and agile based product development for future sustainability. Sustainability 15(2):1121","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"1958_CR46","unstructured":"Mersino A (2022) Why agile is better than waterfall. Vitality Chicago. https:\/\/vitalitychicago.com\/blog\/agile-projects-are-more-successful-traditional-projects\/, viewed 24 October 2022 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2017.09.004","volume":"56","author":"D Mishra","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mishra D, Aydin S, Mishra A, Ostrovska S (2018) Knowledge management in requirement elicitation: situational methods view. Comput Stand Interfaces 56:49\u201361","journal-title":"Comput Stand Interfaces"},{"issue":"6","key":"1958_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1420","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-021-01350-1","volume":"12","author":"A Mishra","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mishra A, Abdalhamid S, Mishra D, Ostrovska S (2021) Organizational issues in embracing agile methods: an empirical assessment. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 12(6):1420\u20131433","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag"},{"key":"1958_CR49","first-page":"1","volume":"7","author":"JD Morgan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morgan JD (2018) Applying 1970 waterfall lessons learned within today\u2019s agile development process. PM World J 7:1\u201319","journal-title":"PM World J"},{"issue":"5","key":"1958_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1145\/1060710.1060712","volume":"48","author":"S Nerur","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nerur S, Mahapatra R, Mangalaraj G (2005) Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun ACM 48(5):72\u201378","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"4","key":"1958_CR51","first-page":"17","volume":"19","author":"D \u00d6zkan","year":"2019","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan D, Mishra A (2019) Agile project management tools: a brief comprative view. Cybern Inf Technol 19(4):17\u201325","journal-title":"Cybern Inf Technol"},{"key":"1958_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-019-00833-6","volume":"10","author":"A Pai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pai A, Joshi G, Rane S (2019) Integration of agile software development and robust design methodology in optimization of software defect parameters. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10:1043\u20131051","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag"},{"issue":"5","key":"1958_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2012.107","volume":"29","author":"M Poppendieck","year":"2012","unstructured":"Poppendieck M, Cusumano MA (2012) Lean software development: a tutorial. IEEE Softw 29(5):26\u201332","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"key":"1958_CR54","unstructured":"PremierAgile (2023) Agile vs waterfall (traditional) project management. https:\/\/premieragile.com\/differences-between-agile-and-waterfall\/, viewed 26 April 2023 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prenner N, Kl\u00fcnder J, Schneider K (2022) Defining frames to structure agile development in hybrid settings: a multi-case interview study. In: International conference on software and system processes and international conference on global software engineering (ICSSP 2022), Virtual. ACM, pp 34\u201344","DOI":"10.1145\/3529320.3529324"},{"key":"1958_CR56","unstructured":"ProductPlan (2023) The waterfall to agile transition: how roadmaps can keep you on track. https:\/\/www.productplan.com\/learn\/waterfall-to-agile-transition\/, viewed 25 April 2023 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR57","unstructured":"ProjectManager (2023) Agile vs waterfall and the rise of hybrid projects. https:\/\/www.projectmanager.com\/guides\/agile-vs-waterfall-hybrid-projects, viewed 25 April 2023 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR58","unstructured":"Raza M (2023) Agile vs waterfall SDLCs: what\u2019s the difference? https:\/\/www.bmc.com\/blogs\/agile-vs-waterfall\/, viewed 24 April 2023 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richter I, Raith F, Weber M (2016) Problems in agile global software engineering projects especially within traditionally organised corporations: an exploratory semi-structured interview study. In: 9th international C* conference on computer science & software engineering, Porto, Portugal. ACM, pp 33\u201343","DOI":"10.1145\/2948992.2949019"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.2504","volume":"35","author":"M Saarikallio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Saarikallio M, Tyrv\u00e4inen P (2022) Quality culture boosts agile transformation\u2014action research in a business-to-business software business. J Softw Evol Process 35(1):e2504","journal-title":"J Softw Evol Process"},{"key":"1958_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schmalz M, Finn A, Taylor H (2014) Risk management in video game development projects. In: 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, USA. IEEE, pp 4325\u20134334","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2014.534"},{"key":"1958_CR62","unstructured":"Serebryantseva V (2022) Agile vs waterfall: which approach should you choose for your project. Pixel Plex. https:\/\/pixelplex.io\/blog\/agile-waterfall-software-development\/, viewed 23 October 2022 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2020.106122","volume":"90","author":"M Shameem","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shameem M, Kumar RR, Nadeem M, Khan AA (2020) Taxonomical classification of barriers for scaling agile methods in global software development environment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 90:106122","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"key":"1958_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Signoretti I et al (2020) Success and failure factors for adopting a combined approach: a case study of two software development teams. In: Morisio M, Torchiano M, Jedlitschka A (eds) Product-focused software process improvement. PROFES 2020. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 12562. Springer, Cham, pp 125\u2013141","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-64148-1_8"},{"key":"1958_CR65","unstructured":"Singer M (2022) 15+ surprising agile statistics: everything you need to know about agile management. Enterprise Apps Today. https:\/\/www.enterpriseappstoday.com\/, viewed 24 October 2022 [Online]"},{"key":"1958_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sinha A, Das P (2021) Agile methodology versus traditional waterfall SDLC: a case study on quality assurance process in software industry. In: 5th international conference on electronics, materials engineering & nano-technology (IEMENTech), Kolkata, India. IEEE, pp 1\u20134","DOI":"10.1109\/IEMENTech53263.2021.9614779"},{"key":"1958_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soundararajan S, Arthur JD (2009) A soft-structured agile framework for larger scale systems development. In: 16th annual IEEE international conference and workshop on the engineering of computer based systems, San Francisco, USA. IEEE, pp 187\u2013195","DOI":"10.1109\/ECBS.2009.21"},{"key":"1958_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-020-00966-z","volume":"11","author":"A Srivastava","year":"2020","unstructured":"Srivastava A, Mehrotra D, Kapur P, Aggarwal AG (2020) Analytical evaluation of agile success factors influencing quality in software industry. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11:247\u2013257","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag"},{"issue":"4","key":"1958_CR69","first-page":"64","volume":"17","author":"M Stoica","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stoica M, Mircea M, Ghilic-Micu B (2013) Software development: agile versus traditional. Inform Econ 17(4):64\u201376","journal-title":"Inform Econ"},{"key":"1958_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2021.01.227","volume":"181","author":"T Thesing","year":"2021","unstructured":"Thesing T, Feldmann C, Burchardt M (2021) Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Comput Sci 181:746\u2013756","journal-title":"Procedia Comput Sci"},{"key":"1958_CR71","unstructured":"The-Standish-Group (2020) Standish group chaos report 2020. The Standish Group. https:\/\/www.standishgroup.com\/news\/45, viewed 24 October 2022 [Online]"},{"issue":"4","key":"1958_CR72","first-page":"864","volume":"21","author":"BV Thummadi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Thummadi BV, Lyytinen K (2020) How much method-in-use matters? A case study of agile and waterfall software projects and their design routine variation. J Assoc Inf Syst 21(4):864\u2013900","journal-title":"J Assoc Inf Syst"},{"issue":"21","key":"1958_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10698","DOI":"10.3390\/app122110698","volume":"12","author":"R Wafa","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wafa R, Khan MQ, Malik F, Abdusalomov AB, Cho YI, Odarchenko R (2022) The impact of agile methodology on project success, with a moderating role of Person\u2019s job fit in the IT industry of Pakistan. Appl Sci 12(21):10698","journal-title":"Appl Sci"},{"key":"1958_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"W\u0142odarski R, Poniszewska-Mara\u0144da A, Falleri J-R (2020) Comparative case study of plan-driven and agile approaches in student computing projects. In: 2020 international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM), Split, Croatia. IEEE, pp 1\u20136","DOI":"10.23919\/SoftCOM50211.2020.9238196"},{"key":"1958_CR75","unstructured":"Yadav M, Goyal N, Yadav J (2015) Agile methodology over iterative approach of software development: a review. In: 2nd international conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India. IEEE, pp 542\u2013547"},{"issue":"1","key":"1958_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1080\/00051144.2010.11828358","volume":"51","author":"L Yu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Yu L, Mishra A (2010) Risk analysis of global software development and proposed solutions. Automatika 51(1):89\u201398","journal-title":"Automatika"}],"container-title":["International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,21]],"date-time":"2023-07-21T08:39:58Z","timestamp":1689928798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]]},"references-count":76,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1958"],"URL":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/s13198-023-01958-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0975-6809","0976-4348"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0975-6809","type":"print"},{"value":"0976-4348","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 April 2023","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2023","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 June 2023","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Authors doesn\u2019t have any conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Human Participants and\/or Animals are not involved in this research.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human and animals\u2019 participants"}},{"value":"There was no informed consent in this research article.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}
