Talk:Q8205328

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
description: physical object made or shaped by humans
Useful links:
Classification of the class artificial physical object (Q8205328)  View with Reasonator View with SQID
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
artificial physical object⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)
Generic queries for classes
Data to provide for this type of item
Title ID Data type Description Examples Inverse
instance ofP31Iteminstance of: class or type of the object. Possible values: one of the classes listed at § Types of visual artworks (or a subclass of those), e.g. painting (Q3305213), a subclass of group of works (Q17489659) etc.Mona Lisa <instance of> painting-
creatorP170Itemcreator, author, visual artist and software developer: maker of this creative work or other object (where no more specific property exists)The Potato Eaters <creator> Vincent van Goghnotable work
creator's signatureP7457Commons media filesignature: image of the artist's mark on the work that identifies their workAdam <creator's signature> Duerermonogramm Adam 1507.jpg-
titleP1476Monolingual textoriginal title and title: published name of a work, such as a newspaper article, a literary work, piece of music, a website, or a performance workMona Lisa <title> La Gioconda-
inceptionP571Point in timedate of establishment, founding and date of the first award: time when an entity begins to exist; for date of official opening use P1619Mona Lisa <inception> 1500s-
depictsP180Itemdepicting object: entity visually depicted in an image, literarily described in a work, or otherwise incorporated into an audiovisual or other medium; see also P921, 'main subject'The Balconydepicted by
shown with featuresP1354Itemsecondary features depicted in a work. Use as qualifier for "depicts" (P180)Mona Lisa <shown with features> waist-length hair-
depicts Iconclass notationP1257StringIconclass: Iconclass code depicted in an artwork, for linking Iconclass codes with their corresponding artistic themes or concepts, use P1256 (Iconclass notation)The Milkmaid <depicts Iconclass notation> 47I22311-
made from materialP186Itemmaterial: material the subject or the object is made of or derived from (do not confuse with P10672 which is used for processes)Mona Lisa <made from material> oil paint-
fabrication methodP2079Itemmanufacturing process, production, process and building method: method, process or technique used to grow, cook, weave, build, assemble, manufacture the itemsilk <fabrication method> sericulture-
heightP2048Quantityheight, human height and body length: vertical length of an entityMona Lisa <height> 77 centimetre-
widthP2049Quantitywidth and road width: width of an objectMona Lisa <width> 53 centimetre-
thicknessP2610Quantitythickness: extent from one surface to the opposite1 Krona - Gustaf V <thickness>millimetre-
commissioned byP88Itemcommissioner: person or organization that commissioned this workArc de Triomphe <commissioned by> Napoleon-
location of creationP1071Itemplace where the item was conceived or made; where applicable, location of final assemblyMona Lisa <location of creation> Florence-
owned byP127Itemproprietor, property and owned by: owner of the subjectChoupette <owned by> Karl Lagerfeldowner of
coordinates of the point of viewP1259Geographic coordinatespoint from which the scene depicted by the element is seen (element can be a photo, a painting, etc.)A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte <coordinates of the point of view> 48° 53′ 12.00″ N 2° 16′ 05.00″ E-
collectionP195Itemcollection and library collection: art, museum, archival, or bibliographic collection the subject is part ofRosetta Stone <collection> British Museum-
inventory numberP217Stringaccession number: identifier for a physical object or a set of physical objects in a collectionThe Night Watch <inventory number> SK-C-5-
catalog codeP528Stringcatalog code: catalog name of an object, use with qualifier P972The Night Watch <catalog code> 2016-
significant eventP793Itemkey event: significant or notable events associated with the subjectMona Lisa <significant event> acquisition-
locationP276Itemphysical location: location of the object, structure or event. In the case of an administrative entity as containing item use P131. For statistical entities use P8138. In the case of a geographic entity use P706. Use P7153 for locations associated with the objectMona Lisa <location> Louvre Museumcontains
coordinate locationP625Geographic coordinatesgeographic coordinates: geocoordinates of the subject. For Earth, please note that only WGS84 coordinating system is supported at the momentMount Everest <coordinate location> 27° 59′ 17.00″ N 86° 55′ 31.00″ E-
inscriptionP1684Monolingual textinscription and epigraph: inscriptions, markings and signatures on an objectShugborough inscription <inscription> O U O S V A V V-
exhibition historyP608Itemexhibition: exhibitions where the item is or was displayedThe Virgin and Child with Saint Anne <exhibition history> Saint Anne, Leonardo da Vinci’s ultimate masterpiece-
imageP18Commons media fileillustration and image: image of relevant illustration of the subject; if available, also use more specific properties (sample: coat of arms image, locator map, flag image, signature image, logo image, collage image)Mona Lisa <image> Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF retouched.jpg-
image with frameP7420Commons media filepicture frame: media file of painting or other 2D artwork with its frame or more of its surroundings includedMona Lisa <image with frame> Leonardo da vinci, la gioconda, 1503-06 circa.jpg-
image of backsideP7417Commons media fileimage of the reverse side of this "2D" objectThe Oxbow <image of backside> View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm—The Oxbow MET DP-12550-002.jpg-
genreP136Itemgenre, by genre and award for best album (genre): creative work's genre or an artist's field of work (P101). Use main subject (P921) to relate creative works to their topicMona Lisa <genre> portrait-
movementP135Itemcultural movement: literary, artistic, scientific or philosophical movement or scene associated with this person or work. For political ideologies use P1142.Max Horkheimer <movement> Frankfurt School-
main subjectP921Itemtopic, matter and subject: primary topic of a work (see also P180: depicts)Mona Lisa <main subject> Lisa del Giocondostatement is subject of
based onP144Itembased on: the work(s) or inputs used as the basis for subject item; for fictional analog use P1074A <based on> Αderivative work
inspired byP941Itemartistic inspiration and inspired: work, human, place or event which inspired this creative work or fictional entityThe Matrix <inspired by> Alice's Adventures in Wonderland-
See also


Item label

[edit]

I'm going to change the English item label from "artefact" to "equipment", so it will match its category Category:Equipment (Q6063063). That's also the name used in the linked enwiki category at en:Category:Equipment and the Commons category. "Artefact" in English often refers to items studied in archaeology, and we would need to use something like "useful artefact" to exclude works of art from the scope. Ghouston (talk) 10:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that category should be used with this item, though? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it has been merged from another item that had the label "equipment" and previously linked to the category. Google translate suggests that the articles are about right. Ghouston (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why should we "exclude works of art from the scope"? In 2016 artificial physical object (Q15222213) was merged by Andreasmperu into this item (artificial physical object (Q8205328)). artificial physical object (Q15222213) was the result of the discussion at Wikidata talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Item structure#Root item I had with Zolo in 2013. It was well defined and explicitly designed to comprise "useful artefacts" and "works of art" and not to distinguish between them. polyptych (Q1278452) and sculpture (Q860861) are still subclass of (P279) of this item (artificial physical object (Q8205328)). As in 2013 I don't think it is a good idea to strictly separate "works of art" and objects that aren't "art" in the classification system. It's not possible to define art that way it is needed for our classification system here and I don't think it is of any value to do so.
Anyway, the Commons category system for objects is the last source I'd use for the labels, descriptions and classification of objects. There are exemptions of course, but wide parts of the Commons classification through categories is quite messy. --Marsupium (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand your doubts about the Commons category system. However, categories for "equipment" can also be found on many Wikipedias, including en:Category:Equipment, and I don't think that pure artworks (or toys) would be in scope for it. Category:Artificial objects (Q26991679) is a broader category that includes those things, along with buildings. Although, the enwiki category system seems to be even messier than Commons, as far as I can see. Perhaps this item has been hijacked at some point, I don't know. Ghouston (talk) 11:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
artificial object (Q16686448) also exists, maybe it should be linked with Category:Artificial objects (Q26991679), although I'm not sure if the latter is supposed to include non-material entities. Ghouston (talk) 11:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
However the current state was reached, with perhaps an inappropriate merge, it seems that an item for "artificial physical object" is now missing. I suppose it's necessary to either create a new item or undo some of the merging. Ghouston (talk) 11:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that "equipment" is a meaningful concept that should have an item in Wikidata, then the obvious thing to do is undo the merge by User:D1gggg of equipment (Q29960888) into this item. Ghouston (talk) 12:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not surprised that the category classification situation on enwiki isn't better. Too bad! Best we can do is not to use it as a guide I think. I'd like to recommend Art & Architecture Thesaurus (Q611299) linked with Art & Architecture Thesaurus ID (P1014) again!
Yes, I think artificial object (Q16686448) also includes non-material things, see Talk:Q16686448#Subclass!
I don't really overview the situation, but if there isn't a "artificial physical object" item, I'd be happy with a restoration on whatever way including undoing of former merges. --Marsupium (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll revert the merge with equipment (Q29960888), which will put this item back to its original state. Ghouston (talk) 06:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AAT doesn't seem to have an identical entry for this particular concept. It fits somewhere under their "Objects Facet" 300264092, which includes practically everything, taking some of the items from other groups including buildings, furnishings and equipment, and Visual and Verbal Communication. Ghouston (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong approach

[edit]

We should use more properties, not to pick definitions.

⟨ subject ⟩ use Search ⟨ protection ⟩
⟨ subject ⟩ use Search ⟨ comfort ⟩

d1g (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does a concept need to be described in a single word in every known language before we can use it? If a Wiki in a particular language isn't interested in a concept, it can refrain from creating an article about it and then needs no link to Wikidata. Wiktionary has a definition of furniture as "Large movable item(s), usually in a room, which enhance(s) the room's characteristics, functionally or decoratively." It would be harder for me to work out what "items that provide comfort" would include. Ghouston (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
1. @User:Ghouston: My message in reply to your "we would need to use something like "useful artefact" to exclude works of art from the scope"
This is not efficient at Wikidata, we use even more properties, not to define artificial exclusions/inclusions
Works of art are physical objects in many worldviews and cultures, proper way is to filter on presence or absence of property has use (P366)
2. Current label "artificial physical object" is not ambiguous. d1g (talk) 18:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ghouston: Another example with clocks made by famous goldsmith (Q211423) - they would be work of art and functional clocks at the same time. d1g (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That discussion about "useful artefacts" now applies to equipment (Q29960888), not to this item. Physical works of art should be included in "artificial physical object". Ghouston (talk) 01:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ghouston: I agree, but
It isn't helpful to change labels to fit specific agreements on Wikidata (as opposed to what every professional would use for them-self in their vocabulary)
Or at least simple senses from dictionaries.
Simply use more properties, not just P31 and P279 all the time.
In some sense it is much useful to use simple word in many languages at 1000 items than complex words in one language at fewer items.
If you start with complex words edits will be slow. d1g (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

M not able to understand how to contribute.... So many links... Too complicated Ksupriya91 (talk) 11:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]