Intermittent vs continuous proton pump inhibitor therapy for high-risk bleeding ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 25201154
- PMCID: PMC4415726
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4056
Intermittent vs continuous proton pump inhibitor therapy for high-risk bleeding ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Current guidelines recommend an intravenous bolus dose of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by continuous PPI infusion after endoscopic therapy in patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers. Substitution of intermittent PPI therapy, if similarly effective as bolus plus continuous-infusion PPI therapy, would decrease the PPI dose, costs, and resource use.
Objective: To compare intermittent PPI therapy with the currently recommended bolus plus continuous-infusion PPI regimen for reduction of ulcer rebleeding.
Data sources: Searches included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through December 2013; US and European gastroenterology meeting abstracts from 2009 to 2013; and bibliographies of systematic reviews.
Study selection: Randomized trials of patients with endoscopically treated high-risk bleeding ulcers (active bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessels, and adherent clots) comparing intermittent doses of PPIs and the currently recommended regimen (80-mg intravenous bolus dose of a PPI followed by an infusion of 8 mg/h for 72 hours).
Data extraction and synthesis: Duplicate independent data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model or a random effects model if statistical heterogeneity was present.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was rebleeding within 7 days; additional predefined outcomes included rebleeding within 3 and 30 days, need for urgent intervention, mortality, red blood cell transfusion, and length of hospital stay. The primary hypothesis, defined before initiation of the literature review, was that intermittent use of PPIs was noninferior to bolus plus continuous infusion of PPIs, with the noninferiority margin predefined as an absolute risk difference of 3%.
Results: The risk ratio of rebleeding within 7 days for intermittent vs bolus plus continuous infusion of PPIs was 0.72 (upper boundary of 1-sided 95% CI, 0.97) and the absolute risk difference was -2.64% (upper boundary of 1-sided 95% CI, -0.28%, which is well below the predefined noninferiority margin of 3%). Risk ratios for rebleeding within 30 days and 3 days, mortality, and urgent interventions were less than 1 and mean differences for blood transfusion and hospital length of stay were less than 0, indicating that no summary estimate showed an increased risk with intermittent therapy. The upper boundaries of 95% CIs for absolute risk differences were less than 1.50% for all predefined rebleeding outcomes.
Conclusions and relevance: Intermittent PPI therapy is comparable to the current guideline-recommended regimen of intravenous bolus plus a continuous infusion of PPIs in patients with endoscopically treated high-risk bleeding ulcers. Guidelines should be revised to recommend intermittent PPI therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Review: in high-risk ulcers, intermittent and continuous PPI therapy do not differ for recurrent bleeding.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):JC8. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2015-162-2-008. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25599368 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 12;2013(6):CD007999. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007999.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23760821 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intravenous versus oral omeprazole on patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers: A prospective randomized clinical trial protocol.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 9;100(14):e25136. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025136. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 33832076 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Vonoprazan Versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor for Prevention of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers Rebleeding After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis: A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial.Gastroenterology. 2024 Sep;167(4):778-787.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.036. Epub 2024 Apr 5. Gastroenterology. 2024. PMID: 38582271 Clinical Trial.
-
High-dose omeprazole infusion compared with scheduled second-look endoscopy for prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):717-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107590. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Endoscopy. 2016. PMID: 27275859 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing intravenous and oral proton pump inhibitor therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers following endoscopic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;83(8):1619-1635. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13258. Epub 2017 Mar 21. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28181291 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of empiric treatment with omeprazole continuous infusion in critically ill children with gastrointestinal bleeding.Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 8;12:1270911. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1270911. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38650990 Free PMC article.
-
[Gastrointestinal bleeding in old age].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Feb;57(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02258-0. Epub 2023 Dec 18. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38108897 German.
-
Comparison Between Pantoprazole Intermittent Dosing and Continuous Infusion in Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prior to Endoscopy: Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Protocol to Reduce Utilization of Pantoprazole Continuous Infusion.Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48056. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38046478 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct;42(5):601-628. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01428-7. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37698821 Review.
-
Intermittent Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Low-Risk Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding May Be Significantly Cost-Saving.Medicines (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;10(7):44. doi: 10.3390/medicines10070044. Medicines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37505065 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, Datto C. Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(8):1190–1196. - PubMed
-
- Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(3):345–361. - PubMed
-
- Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(2):101–113. - PubMed
-
- Chaimoff C, Creter D, Djaldetti M. The effect of pH on platelet and coagulation factor activities. Am J Surg. 1978;136(2):257–259. - PubMed
-
- Green FW, Jr, Kaplan MM, Curtis LE, Levine PH. Effect of acid and pepsin on blood coagulation and platelet aggregation: a possible contributor prolonged gastroduodenal mucosal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1978;74(1):38–43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical