iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22593086
More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):783-6.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331. Epub 2012 May 16.

More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs

Affiliations

More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs

Nicholas G Crawford et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

We present the first genomic-scale analysis addressing the phylogenetic position of turtles, using over 1000 loci from representatives of all major reptile lineages including tuatara. Previously, studies of morphological traits positioned turtles either at the base of the reptile tree or with lizards, snakes and tuatara (lepidosaurs), whereas molecular analyses typically allied turtles with crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). A recent analysis of shared microRNA families found that turtles are more closely related to lepidosaurs. To test this hypothesis with data from many single-copy nuclear loci dispersed throughout the genome, we used sequence capture, high-throughput sequencing and published genomes to obtain sequences from 1145 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their variable flanking DNA. The resulting phylogeny provides overwhelming support for the hypothesis that turtles evolved from a common ancestor of birds and crocodilians, rejecting the hypothesized relationship between turtles and lepidosaurs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Depicts the primary morphological hypotheses: turtles most basally branching reptilian lineage [2]2 or turtles related to lepidosaurs [3].1 (b) Depicts the primary molecular hypothesis of a turtle–archosaur alliance [–14]. (c) Depicts the tree derived from miRNA loci [15].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Reptilian phylogeny estimated from 1145 ultra-conserved loci using Bayesian analysis of concatenated data and species-tree methods, yielding identical topologies. Node labels indicate posterior probability/bootstrap support. (b) Phylogram of the UCE phylogeny generated with STEAC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee M. S. Y., Reeder T. W., Slowinski J. B., Lawson R. 2004. Resolving reptile relationships. In Assembling the tree of life (eds Cracraft J., Donoghue M. J.), pp. 451–467 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
    1. Lee M. 1997. Reptile relationships turn turtle. Nature 389, 245–24610.1038/38422 (doi:10.1038/38422) - DOI - DOI
    1. Rieppel O. 1999. Turtle origins. Science 283, 945–94610.1126/science.283.5404.945 (doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.945) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janke A., Erpenbeck D., Nilsson M., Aranason U. 2001. The mitochondrial genomes of the iguana (Iguana iguana) and the caiman (Caiman crocodylus): implications for amniote phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 623–63110.1098/rspb.2000.1402 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1402) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hedges S., Poling L. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of reptiles. Science 283, 998–100110.1126/science.283.5404.998 (doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.998) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources