How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?
- PMID: 12899258
- DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814481
How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?
Abstract
Ninety-nine healthy people participated in a brain-computer interface (BCI) field study conducted at an exposition held in Graz, Austria. Each subject spent 20-30 min on a two-session BCI investigation. The first session consisted of 40 trials conducted without feedback. Then, a subject-specific classifier was set up to provide the subject with feedback, and the second session--40 trials in which the subject had to control a horizontal bar on a computer screen--was conducted. Subjects were instructed to imagine a right-hand movement or a foot movement after a cue stimulus depending on the direction of an arrow. Bipolar electrodes were mounted over the right-hand representation area and over the foot representation area. Classification results achieved with 1) an adaptive autoregressive model (39 subjects) and 2) band power estimation (60 subjects) are presented. Roughly 93% of the subjects were able to achieve classification accuracy above 60% after two sessions of training.
Similar articles
-
Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006 Jun;14(2):225-9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875578. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006. PMID: 16792300
-
Brain-computer interface: changes in performance using virtual reality techniques.Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jan 9;449(2):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.099. Epub 2008 Nov 5. Neurosci Lett. 2009. PMID: 19000739
-
The Berlin Brain--Computer Interface: accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naïve subjects.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Oct;55(10):2452-62. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.923152. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008. PMID: 18838371
-
ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003 Jun;11(2):110-3. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814448. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003. PMID: 12899248 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.J Neural Eng. 2007 Jun;4(2):R1-R13. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/R01. Epub 2007 Jan 31. J Neural Eng. 2007. PMID: 17409472 Review.
Cited by
-
Large scale investigation of the effect of gender on mu rhythm suppression in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces.Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2024 May 4;11(3):87-97. doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2024.2345449. eCollection 2024. Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2024. PMID: 39355516 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Feasibility of Visual Imagery for an EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:2209-2219. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3410870. Epub 2024 Jun 19. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024. PMID: 38843055 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing and computing humans by means of the brain using Brain-Computer Interfaces - understanding the user - previous evidence, self-relevance and the user's self-concept as potential superordinate human factors of relevance.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 16;17:1286895. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1286895. eCollection 2023. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38435127 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Internal Variables Affect Sensorimotor Rhythm Brain-Computer Interface (SMR-BCI) Performance?HCA Healthc J Med. 2021 Jun 28;2(3):163-179. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1196. eCollection 2021. HCA Healthc J Med. 2021. PMID: 37427003 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What External Variables Affect Sensorimotor Rhythm Brain-Computer Interface (SMR-BCI) Performance?HCA Healthc J Med. 2021 Jun 28;2(3):143-162. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1188. eCollection 2021. HCA Healthc J Med. 2021. PMID: 37427002 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources