iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
Link to original content: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/3032/schedules/data.akn
Sch. 1 para. 1 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 1 para. 2 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 1 para. 3 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 1 para. 4 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 1 para. 5 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 1 para. 6 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 1 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 2 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 3 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 4 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 5 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 6 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 7 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 8 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 9 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 10 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 11 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 12 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 13 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 14 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 15 in force at 1.1.1998, see reg. 1(2)
Sch. 2 para. 15(1)-(2) substituted for Sch. 2 para. 15(1)(2) (20.6.2003) by The Enterprise Act 2002 (Consequential and Supplemental Provisions) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/1398), art. 1, Sch. para. 31(2) (with art. 3(1))
Sch. 1 para. 6 applied by 2000 c. 36, s. 80(3) (as added (1.1.2005) by The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2004 (S.I. 2004/3089), arts. 1, 3(3))
Word in Sch. 2 para. 15 substituted (1.4.2014) by The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (Competition) (Consequential, Transitional and Saving Provisions) (No. 2) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/549), art. 1(1), Sch. 1 para. 27(a) (with art. 3)
Words in Sch. 2 para. 15 inserted (1.4.2014) by The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (Competition) (Consequential, Transitional and Saving Provisions) (No. 2) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/549), art. 1(1), Sch. 1 para. 27(b) (with art. 3)
Words in Sch. 2 para. 15 substituted (1.4.2014) by virtue of The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (Competition) (Consequential, Transitional and Saving Provisions) (No. 2) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/549), art. 1(1), Sch. 1 para. 27(c) (with art. 3)
Sch. 1 para. 3(5) inserted (26.2.2015) by The Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/374), arts. 1(1), 10(2)
Sch. 1 para. 6(2A) inserted (26.2.2015) by The Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/374), arts. 1(1), 10(3)
Words in Sch. 1 para. 6(3) inserted (26.2.2015) by The Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/374), arts. 1(1), 10(4)
Regulation 20(2).
Database right in a database is not infringed by anything done for the purposes of parliamentary or judicial proceedings or for the purposes of reporting such proceedings.
Database right in a database is not infringed by anything done for—
the purposes of the proceedings of a Royal Commission or statutory inquiry, or
the purpose of reporting any such proceedings held in public.
Database right in a database is not infringed by the issue to the public of copies of the report of a Royal Commission or statutory inquiry containing the contents of the database.
In this paragraph “Royal Commission” and “statutory inquiry” have the same meaning as in section 46 of the 1988 Act.
Where the contents of a database are open to public inspection pursuant to a statutory requirement, or are on a statutory register, database right in the database is not infringed by the extraction of all or a substantial part of the contents containing factual information of any description, by or with the authority of the appropriate person, for a purpose which does not involve re-utilisation of all or a substantial part of the contents.
Where the contents of a database are open to public inspection pursuant to a statutory requirement, database right in the database is not infringed by the extraction or re-utilisation of all or a substantial part of the contents, by or with the authority of the appropriate person, for the purpose of enabling the contents to be inspected at a more convenient time or place or otherwise facilitating the exercise of any right for the purpose of which the requirement is imposed.
Where the contents of a database which is open to public inspection pursuant to a statutory requirement, or which is on a statutory register, contain information about matters of general scientific, technical, commercial or economic interest, database right in the database is not infringed by the extraction or re-utilisation of all or a substantial part of the contents, by or with the authority of the appropriate person, for the purpose of disseminating that information.
In this paragraph—
“appropriate person” means the person required to make the contents of the database open to public inspection or, as the case may be, the person maintaining the register;
“statutory register” means a register maintained in pursuance of a statutory requirement; and
“statutory requirement” means a requirement imposed by provision made by or under an enactment.
In sub-paragraph (4) the reference to an enactment includes any enactment contained in Part 3 of the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014.
This paragraph applies where the contents of a database have in the course of public business been communicated to the Crown for any purpose, by or with the licence of the owner of the database right and a document or other material thing recording or embodying the contents of the database is owned by or in the custody or control of the Crown.
The Crown may, for the purpose for which the contents of the database were communicated to it, or any related purpose which could reasonably have been anticipated by the owner of the database right in the database, extract or re-utilise all or a substantial part of the contents without infringing database right in the database.
The Crown may not re-utilise the contents of a database by virtue of this paragraph if the contents have previously been published otherwise than by virtue of this paragraph.
In sub-paragraph (1) “public business” includes any activity carried on by the Crown.
This paragraph has effect subject to any agreement to the contrary between the Crown and the owner of the database right in the database.
The contents of a database which are comprised in public records within the meaning of the Public Records Act 1958
Where the doing of a particular act is specifically authorised by an Act of Parliament, whenever passed, then, unless the Act provides otherwise, the doing of that act does not infringe database right in a database.
Sub-paragraph (1) applies in relation to an enactment contained in Northern Ireland legislation as it applies in relation to an Act of Parliament.
Sub-paragraph (1) applies in relation to an enactment contained in Part 3 of the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 as it applies in relation to an Act of Parliament.
Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as excluding any defence of statutory authority otherwise available under or by virtue of any enactment
Regulation 24.
In this Schedule a “licensing scheme” means a scheme setting out—
the classes of case in which the operator of the scheme, or the person on whose behalf he acts, is willing to grant database right licences, and
the terms on which licences would be granted in those classes of case;
and for this purpose a “scheme” includes anything in the nature of a scheme, whether described as a scheme or as a tariff or by any other name.
In this Schedule a “licensing body” means a society or other organisation which has as its main object, or one of its main objects, the negotiating or granting, whether as owner or prospective owner of a database right or as agent for him, of database right licences, and whose objects include the granting of licences covering the databases of more than one maker.
In this paragraph “database right licences” means licences to do, or authorise the doing of, any of the things for which consent is required under Regulation 16.
Paragraphs 3 to 8 apply to licensing schemes which are operated by licensing bodies and cover databases of more than one maker so far as they relate to licences for extracting or re-utilising all or a substantial part of the contents of a database; and references in those paragraphs to a licensing scheme shall be construed accordingly.
The terms of a licensing scheme proposed to be operated by a licensing body may be referred to the Copyright Tribunal by an organisation claiming to be representative of persons claiming that they require licences in cases of a description to which the scheme would apply, either generally or in relation to any description of case.
The Tribunal shall first decide whether to entertain the reference, and may decline to do so on the ground that the reference is premature.
If the Tribunal decides to entertain the reference it shall consider the matter referred and make such order, either confirming or varying the proposed scheme, either generally or so far as it relates to cases of the description to which the reference relates, as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
If while a licensing scheme is in operation a dispute arises between the operator of the scheme and—
a person claiming that he requires a licence in a case of a description to which the scheme applies, or
an organisation claiming to be representative of such persons,
that person or organisation may refer the scheme to the Copyright Tribunal in so far as it relates to cases of that description.
A scheme which has been referred to the Tribunal under this paragraph shall remain in operation until proceedings on the reference are concluded.
The Tribunal shall consider the matter in dispute and make such order, either confirming or varying the scheme so far as it relates to cases of the description to which the reference relates, as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
Where the Copyright Tribunal has on a previous reference of a licensing scheme under paragraph 3 or 4, or under this paragraph, made an order with respect to the scheme, then, while the order remains in force—
the operator of the scheme,
a person claiming that he requires a licence in a case of the description to which the order applies, or
an organisation claiming to be representative of such persons,
may refer the scheme again to the Tribunal so far as it relates to cases of that description.
A licensing scheme shall not, except with the special leave of the Tribunal, be referred again to the Tribunal in respect of the same description of cases—
within twelve months from the date of the order on the previous reference, or
if the order was made so as to be in force for 15 months or less, until the last three months before the expiry of the order.
A scheme which has been referred to the Tribunal under this section shall remain in operation until proceedings on the reference are concluded.
The Tribunal shall consider the matter in dispute and make such order, either confirming, varying or further varying the scheme so far as it relates to cases of the description to which the reference relates, as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
A person who claims, in a case covered by a licensing scheme, that the operator of the scheme has refused to grant him or procure the grant to him of a licence in accordance with the scheme, or has failed to do so within a reasonable time after being asked, may apply to the Copyright Tribunal.
A person who claims, in a case excluded from a licensing scheme, that the operator of the scheme either—
has refused to grant him a licence or procure the grant to him of a licence, or has failed to do so within a reasonable time of being asked, and that in the circumstances it is unreasonable that a licence should not be granted, or
proposes terms for a licence which are unreasonable,
may apply to the Copyright Tribunal.
A case shall be regarded as excluded from a licensing scheme for the purposes of sub-paragraph (2) if—
the scheme provides for the grant of licences subject to terms excepting matters from the licence and the case falls within such an exception, or
the case is so similar to those in which licences are granted under the scheme that it is unreasonable that it should not be dealt with in the same way.
If the Tribunal is satisfied that the claim is well-founded, it shall make an order declaring that, in respect of the matters specified in the order, the applicant is entitled to a licence on such terms as the Tribunal may determine to be applicable in accordance with the scheme or, as the case may be, to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
Where the Copyright Tribunal has made an order under paragraph 6 that a person is entitled to a licence under a licensing scheme, the operator of the scheme or the original applicant may apply to the Tribunal to review its order.
An application shall not be made, except with the special leave of the Tribunal—
within twelve months from the date of the order, or of the decision on a previous application under this section, or
if the order was made so as to be in force for 15 months or less, or as a result of the decision on a previous application under this section is due to expire within 15 months of that decision, until the last three months before the expiry date.
The Tribunal shall on an application for review confirm or vary its order as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable having regard to the terms applicable in accordance with the licensing scheme or, as the case may be, the circumstances of the case.
A licensing scheme which has been confirmed or varied by the Copyright Tribunal—
under paragraph 3 (reference of terms of proposed scheme), or
under paragraph 4 or 5 (reference of existing scheme to Tribunal),
shall be in force or, as the case may be, remain in operation, so far as it relates to the description of case in respect of which the order was made, so long as the order remains in force.
While the order is in force a person who in a case of a class to which the order applies—
pays to the operator of the scheme any charges payable under the scheme in respect of a licence covering the case in question or, if the amount cannot be ascertained, gives an undertaking to the operator to pay them when ascertained, and
complies with the other terms applicable to such a licence under the scheme,
shall be in the same position as regards infringement of database right as if he had at all material times been the holder of a licence granted by the owner of the database right in question in accordance with the scheme.
The Tribunal may direct that the order, so far as it varies the amount of charges payable, has effect from a date before that on which it is made, but not earlier than the date on which the reference was made or, if later, on which the scheme came into operation.
If such a direction is made—
any necessary repayments, or further payments, shall be made in respect of charges already paid, and
the reference in sub-paragraph (2)(a) to the charges payable under the scheme shall be construed as a reference to the charges so payable by virtue of the order.
No such direction may be made where sub-paragraph (4) below applies.
Where the Tribunal has made an order under paragraph 6 (order as to entitlement to licence under licensing scheme) and the order remains in force, the person in whose favour the order is made shall if he—
pays to the operator of the scheme any charges payable in accordance with the order or, if the amount cannot be ascertained, gives an undertaking to pay the charges when ascertained, and
complies with the other terms specified in the order,
be in the same position as regards infringement of database right as if he had at all material times been the holder of a licence granted by the owner of the database right in question on the terms specified in the order.
Paragraphs 10 to 13 (references and applications with respect to licensing by licensing bodies) apply to licences relating to database right which cover databases of more than one maker granted by a licensing body otherwise than in pursuance of a licensing scheme, so far as the licences authorise extracting or re-utilising all or a substantial part of the contents of a database; and references in those paragraphs to a licence shall be construed accordingly.
The terms on which a licensing body proposes to grant a licence may be referred to the Copyright Tribunal by the prospective licensee.
The Tribunal shall first decide whether to entertain the reference, and may decline to do so on the ground that the reference is premature.
If the Tribunal decides to entertain the reference it shall consider the terms of the proposed licence and make such order, either confirming or varying the terms, as it may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The order may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
A licensee under a licence which is due to expire, by effluxion of time or as a result of notice given by the licensing body, may apply to the Copyright Tribunal on the ground that it is unreasonable in the circumstances that the licence should cease to be in force.
Such an application may not be made until the last three months before the licence is due to expire.
A licence in respect of which a reference has been made to the Tribunal shall remain in operation until proceedings on the reference are concluded.
If the Tribunal finds the application well-founded, it shall make an order declaring that the licensee shall continue to be entitled to the benefit of the licence on such terms as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
An order of the Tribunal under this section may be made so as to be in force indefinitely or for such period as the Tribunal may determine.
Where the Copyright Tribunal has made an order under paragraph 10 or 11, the licensing body or the person entitled to the benefit of the order may apply to the Tribunal to review its order.
An application shall not be made, except with the special leave of the Tribunal—
within twelve months from the date of the order or of the decision on a previous application under this paragraph, or
if the order was made so as to be in force for 15 months or less, or as a result of the decision on a previous application under this section is due to expire within 15 months of that decision, until the last three months before the expiry date.
The Tribunal shall on an application for review confirm or vary its order as the Tribunal may determine to be reasonable in the circumstances.
Where the Copyright Tribunal has made an order under paragraph 10 or 11 and the order remains in force, the person entitled to the benefit of the order shall if he—
pays to the licensing body any charges payable in accordance with the order or, if the amount cannot be ascertained, gives an undertaking to pay the charges when ascertained, and
complies with the other terms specified in the order,
be in the same position as regards infringement of database right as if he had at all material times been the holder of a licence granted by the owner of the database right in question on the terms specified in the order.
The benefit of the order may be assigned—
in the case of an order under paragraph 10, if assignment is not prohibited under the terms of the Tribunal’s order; and
in the case of an order under paragraph 11, if assignment was not prohibited under the terms of the original licence.
The Tribunal may direct that an order under paragraph 10 or 11, or an order under paragraph 12 varying such an order, so far as it varies the amount of charges payable, has effect from a date before that on which it is made, but not earlier than the date on which the reference or application was made or, if later, on which the licence was granted or, as the case may be, was due to expire.
If such a direction is made—
any necessary repayments, or further payments, shall be made in respect of charges already paid, and
the reference in sub-paragraph (1)(a) to the charges payable in accordance with the order shall be construed, where the order is varied by a later order, as a reference to the charges so payable by virtue of the later order.
In determining what is reasonable on a reference or application under this Schedule relating to a licensing scheme or licence, the Copyright Tribunal shall have regard to—
the availability of other schemes, or the granting of other licences, to other persons in similar circumstances, and
the terms of those schemes or licences,
and shall exercise its powers so as to secure that there is no unreasonable discrimination between licensees, or prospective licensees, under the scheme or licence to which the reference or application relates and licensees under other schemes operated by, or other licences granted by, the same person.
Sub-paragraph (1A) applies where whatever needs to be remedied, mitigated or prevented by the Secretary of State
conditions in licences granted by the owner of database right in a database restricting the use of the database by the licensee or the right of the owner of the database right to grant other licences; or
a refusal of an owner of database right to grant licences on reasonable terms.
The powers conferred by Schedule 8 to the Enterprise Act 2002 include power to cancel or modify those conditions and, instead or in addition, to provide that licences in respect of the database right shall be available as of right.
The references to anything permitted by Schedule 8 to the Enterprise Act 2002 in section 12(5A) of the Competition Act 1980 and in sections 75(4)(a), 83(4)(a), 84(2)(a), 89(1), 160(4)(a), 161(3)(a) and 164(1) of, and paragraphs 5, 10 and 11 of Schedule 7 to, the Act of 2002 and paragraphs 5, 10 and 11 of Schedule 2 to the Enterprise Act 2002 (Protection of Legitimate Interests) Order 2003 shall be construed accordingly.
The terms of a licence available by virtue of this paragraph shall, in default of agreement, be settled by the Copyright Tribunal on an application by the person requiring the licence; and terms so settled shall authorise the licensee to do everything in respect of which a licence is so available.
Where the terms of a licence are settled by the Tribunal, the licence has effect from the date on which the application to the Tribunal was made.