Red Dragon

A newer adaptation of Thomas Harris' book, which I consider to be worse than the one from 1986. In terms of story and atmosphere, I found the old version more fitting, as it somehow feels grittier. I don't mean in individual scenes but as a whole. The new Red Dragon tries too hard to be like The Silence of the Lambs, but it doesn't succeed because the only things that stand out are the acting performances, led by Anthony Hopkins and the earnest Edward Norton. (02/01/2014)

Less interesting in terms of plot and more routine, and visually far less attractive, almost ordinary. Red Dragon has almost nothing to captivate the audience, other than a few scenes with Emily Watson and Ralph Fiennes. An overly detailed copy of The Silence of the Lambs, with the difference that there is hardly anything good in here, and there’s plenty of bad. (29/07/2011)

Red Dragon, of course, cannot compare to the precise and visually impressive The Silence of the Lambs. It is still a decent bit of filmmaking, but Ratner is an average director, simply an ordinary film craftsman who follows in the footsteps of his more famous colleagues. There is a lack of impressive original scenes here, the delicate game with the viewer that allowed the widest audience to navigate an ethically problematic subject where the main protagonist is a brutal serial killer. I have no issues with the cast, and Ralph Fiennes particularly enjoys his role as a psychopath. Overall impression: 60%. (31/01/2009)

The commercial has defeated the classic. The extorted substance is truly more exciting and even better than the original Silence of the Lambs. A provocative thriller with a fantastically depressing atmosphere, and unlike the previous (upcoming) installments, it features a likeable and believable investigator on the level of the unmistakable Anthony Hopkins and a perfectly chilling murderer in Ralph Fiennes. The final twist even brings a desire to immediately watch Jonathan Demme's original. This is how the most fundamental essence of a well-known story should be expanded on. (16/07/2006)

This actually turned out to be a pretty enjoyable trilogy and the theme is still relevant. We arc back to the most popular period when the Doctor was in the office behind the Plexiglas, and we go through the whole story with him only to see the magical point of the "agent in waiting." Yet it’s of little use. Although Clarice is seemingly omnipresent, the fact that she is to be replaced by the entire solemn trio of Norton, Fiennes, and Keitel is simply not enough. I'm thus finding the same paradox as in The Silence of the Lambs, where Hopkins' scenes were damn good, but there weren't enough of them. Here we only got the scene with the nice blind lady and a candid scene from the research room. (Of course, it also doesn't look retro, but that's not really the point.) (21/09/2012)