Talk:Truckee, California

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

What's appropriate for an encyclopedia

The opening sections for this article are nicely written and detailed, down to about the Demographics section.

I deleted a most of a paragraph that started with "Truckee's population has the potential to surge..." It violated various rules and guidelines. To understand why it's probably easiest to scan WP:NOT. Specifically, Wiki is not a place to anticipate the future (WP:NOTCRYSTAL). It is not a place for politically-motivated facts that are not given independent, verifiable, reliable citations (e.g., "Interestingly enough, while Truckee residents generally do not like the plan due to its potential impact on the environment.") (WP:SOURCE) (WP:CONFLICT).

I'd like to encourage the editors who are personally familiar with Truckee to examine the rules for adding material to Wikipedia. It's an encyclopedia. It's not a free site where local interests can say anything they want, nor is it a battleground for political views, nor is it for self-promotion. Wiki is paid for, and those are the rules the owners establish for using it.

The majority of the article, at this stage is quite appropriate, and compares favorably with some of the best Wiki articles on cities. For those wanting to "put the icing on the cake", have a look at the style guidelines (which are not rules, as such) having to do with linking words in the article. (WP:CONTEXT). The idea is to link those words and phrases that a typical reader might not understand, or to other articles with significant (and strongly related) information. So, for example, it's better not to link "square miles", "km", "married couples", or "income". The existing link to Chicago is probably not what's intended. Check links to make sure they are adding something useful.

24.130.12.36 (talk) 00:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donner inaccuracy

No one from Alder Creek ever attempted to cross the summit. Hence the claim "A portion of the camp also returned to the Alder Creek campsite" is wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.24.13.217 (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Truckee very racist and dark anti chinesse past

why isn't that expanded this is an enciclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.240.219.104 (talk) 07:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Truckee, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Business and industry section needed

Business and industry section needed. Tourism, skiing, etc. likely dominate, but I don't know. Acwilson9 (talk) 00:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I think a lot of information on the local tourism industry can be found on Google Books and local archives. Novemberjazz 00:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]