Morality through the lens of Confucian heritage countries: collective self variations and moral worldviews
- PMID: 39417031
- PMCID: PMC11479964
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454425
Morality through the lens of Confucian heritage countries: collective self variations and moral worldviews
Abstract
The issue of Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) samples dominating research has been ongoing for decades, and now the emerging trend is to turn to theoretical perspectives from the Majority World. Adopting Western-centric methods based on reductionism can overlook important details and differences between similar cultures, particularly in East Asian cultures, where the Confucian values of relational harmony take many forms. We discuss a novel theoretical perspective on moral constitutions in Confucian heritage cultures. Our central tenet is that divergent moral concepts and ideals are present in Confucian cultures because each culture emphasizes a specific pillar and the self is situated differently in the social relationships that define the scope of interpersonal moral obligations. We consider three Confucian countries: China, Japan, and South Korea as examples. Despite geographical proximity and conventional categorization in cultural psychology, each Confucian country manifests distinct patterns of the self, moral ideals, and behavior in socio-moral contexts. To understand how and why moral worldviews vary within a region, we need to examine how the self in socio-cultural contexts differs and guides interpersonal norms and behaviors across sociocultural contexts. We conclude this paper by offering methodological recommendations for including indigenous moral concepts outside the WEIRD context.
Keywords: Confucianism; East Asia; morality; perspective from non-WEIRD psychology; self.
Copyright © 2024 Takamatsu, Park and Matsuo.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
WEIRD-Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology's evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.Am Psychol. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1037/amp0001298. Online ahead of print. Am Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38271028
-
Understanding the culture and behaviour of East Asians--a Confucian perspective.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;24(4):510-5. doi: 10.3109/00048679009062907. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1990. PMID: 2073227 Review.
-
Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):233-253. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00093-4. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020. PMID: 30806938 Free PMC article.
-
Confucian virtues and Chinese adolescent development: a conceptual review.Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(4):335-44. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2013-0031. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013. PMID: 23612532 Review.
-
The summit of a moral pilgrimage: Confucianism on healthy ageing and social eldercare.Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):316-326. doi: 10.1177/0969733020944446. Epub 2020 Aug 27. Nurs Ethics. 2021. PMID: 32851923 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Akhtar N., Francis L. J., Village A., Sailer A. B., Hasan S. S., McKenna U. (2023). Testing the moral foundations questionnaire within a Muslim society: a study among young adults in Pakistan. J. Relig. Educ. 71, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s40839-023-00195-z - DOI
-
- Barbalet J. (2014). Greater self, lesser self: dimensions of self-interest in Chinese filial piety. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 44, 186–205. doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12037 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources