iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39337187/
The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 14;12(18):1847.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181847.

The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands

Affiliations

The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands

Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Bone age assessments measure the growth and development of children and adolescents by evaluating their skeletal maturity, which is influenced by various factors like heredity, ethnicity, culture, and nutrition. The clinical standards for this assessment should be up to date and appropriate for the specific population being studied. This study validates the GP-Canary Atlas for accurately predicting bone age by analyzing posteroanterior left hand and wrist radiographs of healthy children (80 females and 134 males) from the Canary Islands across various developmental stages and genders. We found strong intra-rater reliability among all three raters, with Raters 1 and 2 indicating very high consistency (intra-class coefficients = 0.990 to 0.996) and Rater 3 displaying slightly lower but still strong reliability (intra-class coefficients = 0.921 to 0.976). The inter-rater agreement was excellent between Raters 1 and 2 but significantly lower between Rater 3 and the other two raters, with intra-class coefficients of 0.408 and 0.463 for Rater 1 and 0.327 and 0.509 for Rater 2. The accuracy analysis revealed a substantial underestimation of bone age compared to chronological age for preschool- (mean difference = 17.036 months; p < 0.001) and school-age males (mean difference = 13.298 months; p < 0.001). However, this was not observed in females, where the mean difference was minimal (3.949 months; p < 0.239). In contrast, the Atlas showed greater accuracy for teenagers, showing only a slight overestimation (mean difference = 3.159 months; p = 0.823). In conclusion, the GP-Canary Atlas demonstrates overall precision but requires caution as it underestimates the BA in preschool children and overestimates it in school-age girls and adolescents.

Keywords: Canary Islands; Greulich and Pyle Atlas; age determination by skeleton; children; diagnostic imaging; radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bland–Altman plots illustrating BA assessments using the GP-Canary Atlas. The plots compare the assessments of Rater 1 with Rater 2 for both females (a) and males (b), Rater 1 with Rater 3 for females (c) and males (d), and Rater 2 with Rater 3 for females (e) and males (f). The dashed lines represent the mean differences, while the shaded areas in orange and green show the limits of agreement (±1.96 standard deviations). The purple lines represent the confidence intervals for the limits of agreement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Accuracy of BA determination using GP-Canary Atlas across different developmental stages. Raincloud plots display BA accuracy in (a) preschool (1 to 5 years), (b) school-age (5 to 12 years), and (c) teenager (12 to 18 years) groups. Method shows significant BA underestimation and variability in preschool and school-age groups, while accuracy improves in teenager group with no significant differences between BA and CA.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tanner J.M. Growth at Adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford, UK: 1962.
    1. Toledo Trujillo F.M., Hernández F.R., Rodríguez I.R. Atlas Radiológico de Referencia de la Edad Ósea en la Población Canaria. Fundación Canaria de Salud y Sanidad de Tenerife; Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain: 2009.
    1. Nandiraju D., Ahmed I. Human skeletal physiology and factors affecting its modeling and remodeling. Fertil. Steril. 2019;112:775–781. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macias H., Hinck L. Mammary Gland Development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2012;1:533–557. doi: 10.1002/wdev.35. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Susman E.J., Houts R.M., Steinberg L., Belsky J., Cauffman E., Dehart G., Friedman S.L., Roisman G.I., Halpern-Felsher B.L., Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Early Child Care Research Network Longitudinal Development of Secondary Sexual Characteristics in Girls and Boys between Ages 9½ and 15½ Years. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2010;164:166–173. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources