Nature should be the model for microbial sciences
- PMID: 39158294
- PMCID: PMC11411942
- DOI: 10.1128/jb.00228-24
Nature should be the model for microbial sciences
Abstract
Until recently, microbiologists have relied on cultures to understand the microbial world. As a result, model organisms have been the focus of research into understanding Bacteria and Archaea at a molecular level. Diversity surveys and metagenomic sequencing have revealed that these model species are often present in low abundance in the environment; instead, there are microbial taxa that are cosmopolitan in nature. Due to the numerical dominance of these microorganisms and the size of their habitats, these lineages comprise mind-boggling population sizes upward of 1028 cells on the planet. Many of these dominant groups have cultured representatives and have been shown to be involved in mediating key processes in nature. Given their importance and the increasing need to understand changes due to climate change, we propose that members of Nitrosophaerota (Nitrosopumilus maritimus), SAR11 (Pelagibacter ubique), Hadesarchaeia, Bathyarchaeia, and others become models in the future. Abundance should not be the only measure of a good model system; there are other organisms that are well suited to advance our understanding of ecology and evolution. For example, the most well-studied symbiotic bacteria, like Buchnera, Aliivibrio, and Rhizobium, should be models for understanding host-associations. Also, there are organisms that hold new insights into major transitions in the evolution of life on the planet like the Asgard Archaea (Heimdallarchaeia). Innovations in a variety of in situ techniques have enabled us to circumvent culturing when studying everything from genetics to physiology. Our deepest understanding of microbiology and its impact on the planet will come from studying these microbes in nature. Laboratory-based studies must be grounded in nature, not the other way around.
Keywords: Archaea; Asgardarchaeota; Bathyarchaeia; Hadesarchaeia; Heimdallarchaeia; Nitrosopumilus; Pelagibacter; SAR11; Thaumarchaeota.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diversity, ecology and evolution of Archaea.Nat Microbiol. 2020 Jul;5(7):887-900. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0715-z. Epub 2020 May 4. Nat Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32367054 Review.
-
Visualization of Lokiarchaeia and Heimdallarchaeia (Asgardarchaeota) by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Catalyzed Reporter Deposition (CARD-FISH).mSphere. 2020 Jul 29;5(4):e00686-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00686-20. mSphere. 2020. PMID: 32727863 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental diversity of bacteria and archaea.Syst Biol. 2001 Aug;50(4):470-8. Syst Biol. 2001. PMID: 12116647 Review.
-
Phylogenetic reconciliation: making the most of genomes to understand microbial ecology and evolution.ISME J. 2024 Jan 8;18(1):wrae129. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae129. ISME J. 2024. PMID: 39001714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Global Genome Question: Microbes as the Key to Understanding Evolution and Ecology: This report is based on a colloquium, “The Global Genome Question: Microbes as the Key to Understanding Evolution and Ecology,” sponsored by the American Academy of Microbiology and held October 11-13, 2002, in Longboat Key, Florida.Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology; 2004. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology; 2004. PMID: 33119236 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
-
- Leonelli S. 2013. Model organism, p 1398–1401. In Dubitzky W, Wolkenhauer O, Cho KH, Yokota H (ed), Encyclopedia of systems biology. Springer, New York, NY.
-
- Lehman IR, Bessman MJ, Simms ES, Kornberg A. 1958. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. I. Preparation of substrates and partial purification of an enzyme from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 233:163–170. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials