Predictors of gamete donation: a cross sectional survey study
- PMID: 38990424
- PMCID: PMC11405607
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03194-7
Predictors of gamete donation: a cross sectional survey study
Abstract
Purpose: In 2015, assisted reproductive technology (ART) accounted for 1.7% of all U.S. births, donor eggs accounted for over 17,000 started cycles in 2015, and donor sperm accounting for 6.2% of all cycles started in 2014. With increasing utilization of donor gametes as a method of assisting patients with infertility, the number of babies born each year utilizing gamete donation will also continue to increase. This study aimed to elucidate factors impacting decision to donate, amongst a representative national population.
Methods: A survey was distributed via the internet utilizing SurveyMonkey Enterprise with HIPAA compliance. Univariate regressions and frequencies were conducted between each demographic and personal characteristic and the willingness to donate. Log Binomial and linear regression was used categorical and continuous variables, and Risk ratios were calculated.
Results: In this large survey study, 64% of men and 50% of women reported they would be willing to donate gametes, with the majority desiring monetary compensation. Men with a high Consumer Financial Protection Bureau score were less likely to report that they would consider donating sperm compared to a medium high CFPB score. No other financial indicators were associated with considering donating sperm. There were no associations between CFPB score and egg donation outcomes. Black or African American women were less likely to consider donating their eggs compared to other groups, and more likely to desire > $5000 in compensation.
Conclusions: In this large survey study, a small minority of participants reported they would be willing to donate to an unknown infertility patient for reproductive purposes. High and very high CFPB scores were associated with willingness to donate games, but not with desire for monetary compensation or amount.
Keywords: Gamete donation; Oocyte donation; Sperm donation; Third party IVF.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Similar articles
-
Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1355-1363.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 6. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28390693
-
Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Jun;33(6):703-10. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0694-4. Epub 2016 Apr 8. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016. PMID: 27059774 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation.Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Dec;47(6):103417. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103417. Epub 2023 Sep 21. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023. PMID: 37931369
-
Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):450-65. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Hum Reprod Update. 2016. PMID: 27016289 Review.
-
Ethical Issues in Sperm, Egg and Embryo Donation: Islamic Shia Perspectives.HEC Forum. 2024 Jun;36(2):167-185. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09498-4. Epub 2022 Nov 12. HEC Forum. 2024. PMID: 36371516 Review.
References
-
- National Summary Report [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=.... Accessed 26 Mar 2024.
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance --- United States, 2004 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5606a1.htm. Accessed 26 Mar 2024.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical