Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism
- PMID: 38153370
- PMCID: PMC10903542
- DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpad231
Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism
Abstract
Sexual antagonism occurs when males and females differ in their phenotypic fitness optima but are constrained in their evolution to these optima because of their shared genome. The sex chromosomes, which have distinct evolutionary "interests" relative to the autosomes, are theorized to play an important role in sexually antagonistic conflict. However, the evolutionary responses of sex chromosomes and autosomes have usually been considered independently, that is, via contrasting the response of a gene located on either an X chromosome or an autosome. Here, we study the coevolutionary response of the X chromosome and autosomes to sexually antagonistic selection acting on a polygenic phenotype. We model a phenotype initially under stabilizing selection around a single optimum, followed by a sudden divergence of the male and female optima. We find that, in the absence of dosage compensation, the X chromosome promotes evolution toward the female optimum, inducing coevolutionary male-biased responses on the autosomes. Dosage compensation obscures the female-biased interests of the X, causing it to contribute equally to male and female phenotypic change. We further demonstrate that fluctuations in an adaptive landscape can generate prolonged intragenomic conflict and accentuate the differential responses of the X and autosomes to this conflict.
Keywords: population genetics; sex chromosomes; sexual antagonism.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Masculinization of the x chromosome in the pea aphid.PLoS Genet. 2013;9(8):e1003690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003690. Epub 2013 Aug 8. PLoS Genet. 2013. PMID: 23950732 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual antagonism leads to a mosaic of X-autosome conflict.Evolution. 2020 Feb;74(2):495-498. doi: 10.1111/evo.13918. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Evolution. 2020. PMID: 31885085
-
A gene's-eye view of sexual antagonism.Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 12;287(1932):20201633. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1633. Epub 2020 Aug 12. Proc Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32781951 Free PMC article.
-
Sex chromosomes and speciation in birds and other ZW systems.Mol Ecol. 2018 Oct;27(19):3831-3851. doi: 10.1111/mec.14537. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Mol Ecol. 2018. PMID: 29443419 Review.
-
Non-random autosome segregation: a stepping stone for the evolution of sex chromosome complexes? Sex-biased transmission of autosomes could facilitate the spread of antagonistic alleles, and generate sex-chromosome systems with multiple X or Y chromosomes.Bioessays. 2011 Feb;33(2):111-4. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000106. Bioessays. 2011. PMID: 21154781 Review.
Cited by
-
Regional specialization, polyploidy, and seminal fluid transcripts in the Drosophila female reproductive tract.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 29;121(44):e2409850121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409850121. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39453739
-
Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 29;121(44):e2406335121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406335121. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39436652
-
The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2412315121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412315121. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39302970
-
Transitions in sex determination mechanisms through parental and sexual antagonism.Heredity (Edinb). 2024 Nov;133(5):331-341. doi: 10.1038/s41437-024-00717-x. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Heredity (Edinb). 2024. PMID: 39164521
References
-
- Abbott, J. K., Bedhomme, S., & Chippindale, A. K. (2010). Sexual conflict in wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(9), 1989–1997. - PubMed
-
- Abbott, J. K., Lund-Hansen, K. K., & Olito, C. (2023). Why is measuring and predicting fitness under genomic conflict so hard? Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 81, 102070. - PubMed
-
- Albert, A. Y., & Otto, S. P. (2005). Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science, 310(5745), 119–121. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources