iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35088868/
On the Need for New Measures of Phylogenomic Support - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 16;71(4):917-920.
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syac002.

On the Need for New Measures of Phylogenomic Support

Robert C Thomson  1 , Jeremy M Brown  2
Affiliations

On the Need for New Measures of Phylogenomic Support

Robert C Thomson et al. Syst Biol. .

Abstract

The scale of data sets used to infer phylogenies has grown dramatically in the last decades, providing researchers with an enormous amount of information with which to draw inferences about evolutionary history. However, standard approaches to assessing confidence in those inferences (e.g., nonparametric bootstrap proportions [BP] and Bayesian posterior probabilities [PPs]) are still deeply influenced by statistical procedures and frameworks that were developed when information was much more limited. These approaches largely quantify uncertainty caused by limited amounts of data, which is often vanishingly small with modern, genome-scale sequence data sets. As a consequence, today's phylogenomic studies routinely report near-complete confidence in their inferences, even when different studies reach strongly conflicting conclusions and the sites and loci in a single data set contain much more heterogeneity than our methods assume or can accommodate. Therefore, we argue that BPs and marginal PPs of bipartitions have outlived their utility as the primary means of measuring phylogenetic support for modern phylogenomic data sets with large numbers of sites relative to the number of taxa. Continuing to rely on these measures will hinder progress towards understanding remaining sources of uncertainty in the most challenging portions of the Tree of Life. Instead, we encourage researchers to examine the ideas and methods presented in this special issue of Systematic Biology and to explore the area further in their own work. The papers in this special issue outline strategies for assessing confidence and uncertainty in phylogenomic data sets that move beyond stochastic error due to limited data and offer promise for more productive dialogue about the challenges that we face in reaching our shared goal of understanding the history of life on Earth.[Big data; gene tree variation; genomic era; statistical bias.].

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allman E.S., Mitchell J.D., Rhodes J.A.. 2022. Gene tree discord, simplex plots, and statistical tests under the coalescent. Syst. Biol. 71(4):929–942. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allman E.S., Kubatko L.S., Rhodes J.A.. 2017. Split scores: a tool to quantify phylogenetic signal in genome-scale data. Syst. Biol. 66(4):620-636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arcila D., Ortí G., Vari R., Armbruster J.W., Stiassny M.L., Ko K.D., Sabaj M.H., Lundberg J., Revell L.J., Betancur-R R.. 2017. Genome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1(2):1-10. - PubMed
    1. Arcila D., Hughes L.C., Meléndez-Vazquez B., Baldwin C.C., White W.T., Carpenter K.E., Williams J.T., Santos M.D., Pogonoski J.J., Miya M., Ortí G., Betancur-R R.. 2021. Testing the utility of alternative metrics of branch support to address the ancient evolutionary radiation of tunas, stromateoids, and allies (Teleostei: Pelagiaria). Syst. Biol. 70(6):1123–1144. - PubMed
    1. Bollback J.P. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19(7):1171-1180. - PubMed

Publication types