A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia
- PMID: 34791044
- PMCID: PMC10364913
- DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab354
A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia
Abstract
Background: This was a prospective, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving two parallel groups of patients.
Methods: Adult patients with symptomatic unilateral primary inguinal hernia were included in this study. Patients were enrolled and treated in five Finnish hospitals. Eligible patients were randomized by use of a computer-based program to receiving either open anterior repair (modified Lichtenstein) with glue mesh fixation or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The primary aims were to compare 30-day patient-reported pain scores and return to work after surgery between the two groups.
Results: A total of 202 patients were randomized: 98 patients to TEP repair and 104 patients to open repair. All randomized patients received their allocated treatment. A total of 86 patients (88 per cent) in the TEP group and 94 patients (90 per cent) in the Lichtenstein group completed the 30-day follow-up. Patients experienced less early pain (P < 0.001) and used less analgesics after TEP repair, compared to those who had modified Lichtenstein repair. Two patients in the TEP group and five in the Lichtenstein group developed superficial wound infection (P = 0⋅446). Only one reoperation was performed in the Lichtenstein group due to haematoma.
Conclusion: TEP inguinal hernia repair is associated with less early postoperative pain compared to the open glue mesh fixation technique.
Trial registration: NCT03566433 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Plain language summary
In this randomized clinical trial, we compared two different operating techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Patients were randomized to receiving either open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. After the operation, patient-reported pain and functional outcomes were compared. Patients experienced less pain after laparoscopic repair.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comment on: A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia.Br J Surg. 2022 Apr 19;109(5):e79. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac037. Br J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35187561 No abstract available.
-
Author response to: A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia.Br J Surg. 2022 Apr 19;109(5):e80. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac023. Br J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35187562 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial).Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):845-855. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11230. Br J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31162663 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between Lichtenstein And Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitonial (TEP) Tension Free Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia.Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Oct;31(4):1128-1134. Mymensingh Med J. 2022. PMID: 36189562
-
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023. Arch Surg. 2012. PMID: 22430907 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Br J Surg. 2013 May;100(6):735-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9072. Epub 2013 Feb 22. Br J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23436683 Review.
-
Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1269-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2025-2. Epub 2012 Feb 21. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22350225 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic vs. Open Approach in Emergent Inguinal Hernia: Our Experience and Review of Literature.J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Jun 16;2:11242. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11242. eCollection 2023. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023. PMID: 38515586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two-port (single incision plus one port) versus single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a retrospective comparative study.Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):595-600. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01716-z. Epub 2023 Dec 9. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 38070072
-
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38066631 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):485-501. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02631-9. Epub 2022 May 26. Hernia. 2023. PMID: 35618958 Review.
References
-
- Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ.. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:835–839. - PubMed
-
- Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM.. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989;157:188–193. - PubMed
-
- Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G, Ljungdahl M, Wollert S, Gunnarsson U.. TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3632–3638. - PubMed