Fourteen-year outcomes of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the Zenith stent graft
- PMID: 27832988
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.117
Fourteen-year outcomes of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the Zenith stent graft
Abstract
Objective: Long-term results of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular repair are affected by graft design renewals that tend to improve the performance of older generation prostheses but usually reset the follow-up times to zero. The present study investigated the long-term outcomes of endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) using the Zenith graft, still in use without major modification, in a single center experience.
Methods: Between 2000 and 2011, 610 patients underwent elective EVAR using the Zenith endograft (Cook Inc, Bloomington, Ind) and represent the study group. Primary outcomes were overall survival, freedom from AAA rupture, and freedom from AAA-related death. Secondary outcomes included freedom from late (>30 days) reintervention, freedom from late (>30 days) conversion to open repair, freedom from aneurysm sac enlargement >5.0 mm and freedom from EVAR failure, defined as a composite of AAA-related death, AAA rupture, AAA growth >5 mm, and any reintervention.
Results: Mean age was 73.2 years. Mean aneurysm diameter was 55.3 mm. There were five perioperative deaths (0.8%) and three intraoperative conversions. At a mean follow-up of 99.2 (range, 0-175) months, seven AAA ruptures occurred, all fatal except one. Overall survival was 92.8% ± 1.1% at 1 year, 70.1% ± 1.9% at 5 years, 37.8% ± 2.9% at 10 years, and 24 ± 4% at 14 years. Freedom from AAA-rupture was 99.8% ± 0.02 at 1 year (one case), 99.4% ± 0.04 at 5 years (three cases), and 98.1% ± 0.07 at 10 and 14 years. Freedom from late reintervention and conversion was 98% ± 0.6 at 1 year, 87.7% ± 1.5 at 5 years, 75.7% ± 3.2 at 10 years, and 69.9% ± 5.2 at 14 years. Freedom from aneurysm sac growth >5.0 mm was 99.8% at 1 year, 96.6% ± 0.7 at 5 years, 81.0% ± 3.4 at 10 years, and 74.1% ± 5.8% at 14 years. EVAR failure occurred in 132 (21.6%) patients at 14 years. At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of EVAR failure resulted type I and III endoleak (hazard ratio [HR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6- 9.7; P < .001], type II endoleak (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4; P < .001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.6; P = .034).
Conclusions: EVAR with Zenith graft represents a safe and durable repair. Risk of rupture and aneurysm-related death is low, whereas overall long-term survival remains poor. Novel endograft models should be tested and evaluated considering that one-fourth of the operated patients will still be alive after 14 years.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Results of standard suprarenal fixation endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysms with neck length ≤10 mm in high-risk patients unfit for open repair and fenestrated endograft.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):563-570.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 May 13. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27183854
-
Long-term results after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the Cook Zenith endograft.J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):48-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.068. Epub 2011 Apr 2. J Vasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21459545
-
Prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair provides no survival benefits when the aneurysm ruptures.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.099. Epub 2010 Jul 31. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20674248
-
Late Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Previous Endovascular Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):734-44. doi: 10.1177/1526602815601405. Epub 2015 Aug 18. J Endovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 26286073 Review.
-
The endovascular treatment of juxta-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm using fenestrated endograft: early and mid-term results.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Apr;60(2):237-244. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09049-2. Epub 2015 Sep 29. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019. PMID: 26417936 Review.
Cited by
-
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Can the Anaconda™ Custom-Made Device Deliver? An International Perspective.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 14;9:959149. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959149. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35911560 Free PMC article.
-
The Technological Advancement to Engineer Next-Generation Stent-Grafts: Design, Material, and Fabrication Techniques.Adv Healthc Mater. 2022 Jul;11(13):e2200271. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200271. Epub 2022 May 16. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022. PMID: 35481675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What factors counteract mid-term survival following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2021 Mar;18(1):8-14. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2021.105179. Epub 2021 May 15. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2021. PMID: 34552638 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical evaluation of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on long-term experiences.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):191-198. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.93984. Epub 2020 Mar 27. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021. PMID: 33786134 Free PMC article.
-
Endoluminal Management of Infra-renal Aortic and Aorto-iliac Aneurysms.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1788-1797. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02563-w. Epub 2020 Jun 21. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32566971 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources