Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm
- PMID: 27059774
- PMCID: PMC4889478
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0694-4
Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study is to examine attitudes towards aspects of donation treatment based on a national Swedish sample of gamete donors and couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
Methods: The present study was part of the Swedish study on gamete donation, a prospective longitudinal cohort study including all fertility clinics performing gamete donation in Sweden. The sample comprised 164 oocyte donors, 89 sperm donors, 251 people treated with their own gametes (in vitro fertilisation (IVF)), 213 oocyte recipients and 487 sperm recipients. A study-specific questionnaire was used.
Results: Attitudes vary widely between couples using their own gametes for IVF and those receiving or donating oocyte or sperm. The groups differed in their responses to most questions. Oocyte and sperm donors were more likely to agree with the statements "The donor should be informed if the donation results in a child" and "Offspring should receive some information about the donor during mature adolescence" than recipients of donated gametes and couples treated with their own gametes.
Conclusion: Donor recipients, IVF couples and donors expressed different attitudes towards openness and information when it came to gamete donation, and those differences seemed to depend on their current reproductive situation.
Keywords: Attitudes; Embryo donation; Gamete donation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):853-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq365. Epub 2011 Jan 5. Hum Reprod. 2011. PMID: 21212053
-
Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1978-86. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu152. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25030191 Free PMC article.
-
Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.Hum Reprod. 2012 Oct;27(10):2998-3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285. Epub 2012 Aug 1. Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID: 22859508 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):450-65. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Hum Reprod Update. 2016. PMID: 27016289 Review.
-
Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation.Fertil Steril. 1995 Nov;64(5):885-94. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57897-2. Fertil Steril. 1995. PMID: 7589629 Review.
Cited by
-
An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03298-0. Online ahead of print. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39446242
-
Ethical Challenges of Embryo Donation in Embryo Donors and Recipients.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Jan-Feb;23(1):36-39. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_162_16. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018. PMID: 29344044 Free PMC article.
References
-
- SOSFS, The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2007.
-
- Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-conceived people’s access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. Int J Law Policy Family. 2009;23(2):174–91. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebp002. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical