iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23908239
Sequencing Y chromosomes resolves discrepancy in time to common ancestor of males versus females - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 2;341(6145):562-5.
doi: 10.1126/science.1237619.

Sequencing Y chromosomes resolves discrepancy in time to common ancestor of males versus females

Affiliations

Sequencing Y chromosomes resolves discrepancy in time to common ancestor of males versus females

G David Poznik et al. Science. .

Abstract

The Y chromosome and the mitochondrial genome have been used to estimate when the common patrilineal and matrilineal ancestors of humans lived. We sequenced the genomes of 69 males from nine populations, including two in which we find basal branches of the Y-chromosome tree. We identify ancient phylogenetic structure within African haplogroups and resolve a long-standing ambiguity deep within the tree. Applying equivalent methodologies to the Y chromosome and the mitochondrial genome, we estimate the time to the most recent common ancestor (T(MRCA)) of the Y chromosome to be 120 to 156 thousand years and the mitochondrial genome T(MRCA) to be 99 to 148 thousand years. Our findings suggest that, contrary to previous claims, male lineages do not coalesce significantly more recently than female lineages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Callability mask for the Y chromosome
Exponentially-weighted moving averages of read depth (blue line) and the proportion of reads mapping ambiguously (MQ0 ratio; violet line) versus physical position. Regions with values outside the envelopes defined by the dashed lines (depth) or dotted lines (MQ0) were flagged (blue and violet boxes) and merged for exclusion (gray boxes). The complement (black boxes) defines the regions within which reliable genotype calls can be made. Below, a scatter plot indicates the positions of all observed SNVs. Those incompatible with the inferred phylogenetic tree (red) are uniformly distributed. The X-degenerate regions yield quality sequence data, ampliconic sequences tend to fail both filters, and mapping quality is poor in the X-transposed region.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Y chromosome phylogeny inferred from genomic sequencing
This tree recapitulates the previously known topology of the Y chromosome phylogeny; however, branch lengths are now free of ascertainment bias. Branches are drawn proportional to the number of derived SNVs. Internal branches are labeled with defining ISOGG variants inferred to have arisen on the branch. Leaves are colored by major haplogroup cluster and labeled with the most derived mutation observed and the population from which the individual was drawn. Previously uncharacterized structure within African hgB2 is indicated in orange. (Inset) Resolution of a polytomy was possible through the identification of a variant for which hgG retains the ancestral allele, whereas hgH and hgIJK share the derived allele.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Similarity of TMRCA does not imply equivalent Ne of males and females
The TMRCA for a given locus is drawn from a predata (i.e., prior) distribution that is a function of Ne, generation time, sample size, and demographic history. Consider the distribution of possible TMRCA's for a set of 100 uniparental chromosomes. Although the Mbuti mtDNA Ne is twice as large as that of the Baka Y chromosome, the corresponding predata TMRCA distributions overlap considerably.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • An unbiased resource of novel SNP markers provides a new chronology for the human Y chromosome and reveals a deep phylogenetic structure in Africa.
    Scozzari R, Massaia A, Trombetta B, Bellusci G, Myres NM, Novelletto A, Cruciani F. Scozzari R, et al. Genome Res. 2014 Mar;24(3):535-44. doi: 10.1101/gr.160788.113. Epub 2014 Jan 6. Genome Res. 2014. PMID: 24395829 Free PMC article.
  • A revised root for the human Y chromosomal phylogenetic tree: the origin of patrilineal diversity in Africa.
    Cruciani F, Trombetta B, Massaia A, Destro-Bisol G, Sellitto D, Scozzari R. Cruciani F, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jun 10;88(6):814-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 May 27. Am J Hum Genet. 2011. PMID: 21601174 Free PMC article.
  • A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture.
    Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Wilson Sayres MA, Järve M, Talas UG, Rootsi S, Ilumäe AM, Mägi R, Mitt M, Pagani L, Puurand T, Faltyskova Z, Clemente F, Cardona A, Metspalu E, Sahakyan H, Yunusbayev B, Hudjashov G, DeGiorgio M, Loogväli EL, Eichstaedt C, Eelmets M, Chaubey G, Tambets K, Litvinov S, Mormina M, Xue Y, Ayub Q, Zoraqi G, Korneliussen TS, Akhatova F, Lachance J, Tishkoff S, Momynaliev K, Ricaut FX, Kusuma P, Razafindrazaka H, Pierron D, Cox MP, Sultana GN, Willerslev R, Muller C, Westaway M, Lambert D, Skaro V, Kovačevic L, Turdikulova S, Dalimova D, Khusainova R, Trofimova N, Akhmetova V, Khidiyatova I, Lichman DV, Isakova J, Pocheshkhova E, Sabitov Z, Barashkov NA, Nymadawa P, Mihailov E, Seng JW, Evseeva I, Migliano AB, Abdullah S, Andriadze G, Primorac D, Atramentova L, Utevska O, Yepiskoposyan L, Marjanovic D, Kushniarevich A, Behar DM, Gilissen C, Vissers L, Veltman JA, Balanovska E, Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Metspalu A, Fedorova S, Eriksson A, Manica A, Mendez FL, Karafet TM, Veeramah KR, Bradman N, Hammer MF, Osipova LP, Balanovsky O, Khusnutdinova EK, Johnsen K, Remm M, Thomas MG, Tyler-Smith C, Underhill PA, Willerslev E, Nielsen R, Metspalu M, Villems R, Kivisil… See abstract for full author list ➔ Karmin M, et al. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. Genome Res. 2015. PMID: 25770088 Free PMC article.
  • The study of human Y chromosome variation through ancient DNA.
    Kivisild T. Kivisild T. Hum Genet. 2017 May;136(5):529-546. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1773-z. Epub 2017 Mar 4. Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28260210 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Human Y-chromosome variation in the genome-sequencing era.
    Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C. Jobling MA, et al. Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Aug;18(8):485-497. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.36. Epub 2017 May 30. Nat Rev Genet. 2017. PMID: 28555659 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Pritchard JK, Seielstad MT, Perez-Lezaun A, Feldman MW. Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:1791–8. - PubMed
    1. Thomson R, Pritchard JK, Shen P, Oefner PJ, Feldman MW. Recent common ancestry of human Y chromosomes: evidence from DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7360–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tang H, Siegmund DO, Shen P, Oefner PJ, Feldman MW. Frequentist estimation of coalescence times from nucleotide sequence data using a tree-based partition. Genetics. 2002;161:447–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hammer MF. A recent common ancestry for human Y chromosomes. Nature. 1995;378:376–8. - PubMed
    1. Cruciani F, et al. A revised root for the human Y chromosomal phylogenetic tree: the origin of patrilineal diversity in Africa. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:814–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources