Acceptability of contraception for men: a review
- PMID: 20933119
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.03.016
Acceptability of contraception for men: a review
Abstract
Methods of contraception for use by men include condoms, withdrawal and vasectomy. Prevalence of use of a method and continuation rates are indirect measures of acceptability. Worldwide, none of these "male methods" accounts for more than 7% of contraceptive use although uptake varies considerably between countries. Acceptability can be assessed directly by asking about intended (hypothetical) use and assessing satisfaction during/after use. Since they have been around for a very long time, there are very few data of this nature on condoms (as contraceptives rather than for prevention of infection), withdrawal or vasectomy. There are direct data on the acceptability of hormonal methods for men but from relatively small clinical trials which undoubtedly do not represent the real world. Surveys undertaken among the male general public demonstrate that, whatever the setting, at least 25% of men - and in most countries substantially more - would consider using hormonal contraception. Although probably an overestimate of the number of potential users when such a method becomes available, it would appear that hormonal contraceptives for men may have an important place on the contraceptive menu. Despite commonly expressed views to the contrary, most women would trust their male partner to use a hormonal method.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Current status and future perspectives in male contraception.Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Jun;59(3):299-310. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17576406 Review.
-
Status of male contraception.Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1977;6:355-69. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1977. PMID: 337192 Review.
-
Male contraception.Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002 Oct;2(5):338-45. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002. PMID: 12215306 Review.
-
Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples.Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Mar;55(1):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00572.x. Int Nurs Rev. 2008. PMID: 18275543
-
Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s.Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Jul-Aug;24(4):227-35. Stud Fam Plann. 1993. PMID: 8212092
Cited by
-
The landscape of male contraception A narrative review.Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):353-359. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8728. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024. PMID: 38896482 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ca2+ homeostasis and male fertility: a target for a new male contraceptive system.Anim Cells Syst (Seoul). 2024 Apr 28;28(1):171-183. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2024.2345647. eCollection 2024. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul). 2024. PMID: 38686363 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nonhormonal Male Contraceptive Development-Strategies for Progress.Pharmacol Rev. 2023 Dec 15;76(1):37-48. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000787. Pharmacol Rev. 2023. PMID: 38101934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging concepts in male contraception: a narrative review of novel, hormonal and non-hormonal options.Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 8;17:26334941221138323. doi: 10.1177/26334941221138323. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36909934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-throughput screening method for discovering CatSper inhibitors using membrane depolarization caused by external calcium chelation and fluorescent cell barcoding.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Jan 19;11:1010306. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1010306. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023. PMID: 36743410 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical