iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19788967
Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Oct;201(4):357.e1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.003.

Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes

Dwight J Rouse et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes as a function of second-stage labor duration.

Study design: We assessed outcomes in nulliparous laboring women who were enrolled in a trial of fetal pulse oximetry.

Results: Of 5341 participants, 4126 women reached the second stage of labor. As the duration of the second stage increased, spontaneous vaginal delivery rates declined, from 85% when the duration was <1 hour to 9% when it was > or =5 hours. Adverse maternal outcomes that were associated significantly with the duration of the second stage of labor included chorioamnionitis (overall rate, 3.9%), third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (overall rate, 8.7%), and uterine atony (overall rate, 3.9%). Odds ratios for each additional hour of the second stage of labor ranged from 1.3-1.8. Among individual adverse neonatal outcomes, only admission to a neonatal intensive care unit was associated significantly with second stage duration (odds ratio, 1.4).

Conclusion: The second stage of labor does not need to be terminated for duration alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen WR. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:266–9. - PubMed
    1. Moon JM, Smith CV, Rayburn WF. Perinatal outcome after a prolonged second stage of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:229–31. - PubMed
    1. Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:906–12. - PubMed
    1. Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U, Huber S, Strobl B, et al. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:214–21. - PubMed
    1. O'Connell MP, Hussain J, MacLennan FA, Lindow SW. Factors associated with a prolonged second state of labour – a case-controlled study of 364 nulliparous labours. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:255–7. - PubMed

Grants and funding