iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18715117
Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug 19;6(8):e202.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202.

Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition

Affiliations

Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition

Helmut Prior et al. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

Comparative studies suggest that at least some bird species have evolved mental skills similar to those found in humans and apes. This is indicated by feats such as tool use, episodic-like memory, and the ability to use one's own experience in predicting the behavior of conspecifics. It is, however, not yet clear whether these skills are accompanied by an understanding of the self. In apes, self-directed behavior in response to a mirror has been taken as evidence of self-recognition. We investigated mirror-induced behavior in the magpie, a songbird species from the crow family. As in apes, some individuals behaved in front of the mirror as if they were testing behavioral contingencies. When provided with a mark, magpies showed spontaneous mark-directed behavior. Our findings provide the first evidence of mirror self-recognition in a non-mammalian species. They suggest that essential components of human self-recognition have evolved independently in different vertebrate classes with a separate evolutionary history.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Magpie with Yellow Mark
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of the Behaviors That Were Used for Quantitative Analysis
(A) Attempt to reach the mark with the beak; (B) touching the mark area with the foot; (C) touching the breast region outside the marked area; (D) touching other parts of the body. Behaviors (A) and (B) entered the analysis as mark-directed behavior; behaviors (C) and (D) and similar actions towards other parts of the body were considered self-directed, but not related to the mark.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Proportion of Self-Directed Behavior towards the Mark Area Expressed as a Proportion of Overall Self-Directed Behavior in Subjects Gerti and Goldie
Orange bars refer to tests with a colored mark (yellow or red), black bars to tests with a black control mark (sham condition). In Gerti (p < 0.005, Fisher exact test), as well as in Goldie (p < 0.05, Fisher exact test), mark-directed behavior was significantly enhanced in the colored mark and mirror condition.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Proportion of Self-Directed Behavior towards the Mark Area in Additional Tests
(A) Proportion of mark-directed behavior by Gerti in a test session with change of marks in consecutive 5-min intervals. The color of each bar refers to the color of the mark used and subsequent 5-min periods of the test. Activity towards the mark was high for all colored marks, but low in the control condition (black mark). In all of the color conditions, the bird removed the mark. (B) Results from the first set of additional controls with a grid in front of the experimental cage instead of a Plexiglas wall. In the colored mark and mirror condition, mark-directed behavior was higher than in the colored mark and no-mirror condition (p < 0.02, Fisher exact test).

Comment in

  • The thief in the mirror.
    de Waal FB. de Waal FB. PLoS Biol. 2008 Aug 19;6(8):e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060201. PLoS Biol. 2008. PMID: 18715116 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gallup GG., Jr Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science. 1970;167:86–87. - PubMed
    1. Lethmate J, Dücker G. Untersuchungen zum Selbsterkennen im Spiegel bei Orang-Utans und einigen anderen Affenarten. Z Tierpsychol. 1973;33:248–269. - PubMed
    1. Walraven V, van Elsacker L, Verheyen R. Reactions of a group of pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) to their mirror images: evidence of self-recognition. Primates. 1995;36:145–150.
    1. Ledbetter DH, Basen JA. Failure to demonstrate self-recognition in gorillas. Am J Primatol. 1982;2:307–310. - PubMed
    1. Hyatt CW. Responses of gibbons (Hylobates lar) to their mirror images. Am J Primatol. 1998;45:307–311. - PubMed

Publication types