Portals to Wonderland: health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
- PMID: 15769291
- PMCID: PMC1079858
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-7
Portals to Wonderland: health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
Abstract
Background: The Internet offers a seemingly endless amount of health information of varying quality. Health portals, which provide entry points to quality-controlled collections of websites, have been hailed as a solution to this problem. The objective of this study is to assess the extent to which government-run health portals provide access to relevant, valid and understandable information about the effects of health care.
Methods: We selected eight clinically relevant questions for which there was a systematic review, searched four portals for answers, and compared the answers we found to the results of the systematic reviews.
Results: Our searches resulted in 3400 hits, 155 of which mentioned both the condition and the intervention in one of the eight questions. Sixty-three of the 155 web pages did not give any information about the effect of the intervention. Seventy-seven qualitatively described the effects of the intervention. Twenty-six of these had information that was too unclear to be categorised; 15 were not consistent with the systematic review; and 36 were consistent with the review, but usually did not mention what happens without the intervention, what outcomes have been measured or when they were measured. Fifteen web pages quantitatively described effects. Four of these were abstracts from the systematic review, nine had information that was incomplete and potentially misleading because of a lack of information about people not receiving the intervention and the length of follow-up; one had information that was consistent with the review, but only referred to three trials whereas the review included six; and one was consistent with the review.
Conclusion: Information accessible through health portals is unlikely to be based on systematic reviews and is often unclear, incomplete and misleading. Portals are only as good as the websites they lead to. Investments in national health portals are unlikely to benefit consumers without investments in the production and maintenance of relevant, valid and understandable information to which the portals lead.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
A Review of Effects of Governmental Web-Based Information Services [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2005 Mar. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 07-2005. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2005 Mar. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 07-2005. PMID: 29319998 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A systematic review of studies of web portals for patients with diabetes mellitus.Mhealth. 2017 Jun 12;3:23. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.05.05. eCollection 2017. Mhealth. 2017. PMID: 28736732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are Google or Yahoo a good portal for getting quality healthcare web information?AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:878. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006. PMID: 17238498 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
An integrative systematic review on interventions to improve layperson's ability to identify trustworthy digital health information.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 25;3(10):e0000638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000638. eCollection 2024 Oct. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39453891 Free PMC article.
-
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where's the evidence?F1000Res. 2023 Nov 27;11:890. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123051.1. eCollection 2022. F1000Res. 2023. PMID: 37928808 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2020 vision? A retrospective study of time-bound curative claims in British and Irish newspapers.Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):213-214. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X719261. Print 2022 May. Br J Gen Pract. 2022. PMID: 35483953 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Frequency of Online Health Information Seeking and Types of Information Sought Among the General Chinese Population: Cross-sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e30855. doi: 10.2196/30855. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34860676 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study.BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 21;10(7):e036348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32699132 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Irwig J, Irwig L, Sweet M. Smart Health Choices: How to make informed health decisions. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 1999.
-
- Ademiluyia G, Reesb CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:151–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical