Given it's now been several years, would wgAction now be able to be set to "edit"? And if not, could it be set to something like "veedit" instead? Having wgAction set to "view" while editing the page in VE/2017 seems misleading.

In T75714#8777659, @egardner wrote:

What is more, some ES6 syntax (like const) seems to be allowed, while other things like arrow functions will still cause validation to fail.

Yeah I was thinking about just using a CSS filter: invert(1) but it's all one image, meaning it'd invert the logo too, not just the text.

All of the patches I've opened have been merged, so I'm going to go ahead and close this.

@Aklapper Since change 603941 was merged, should I leave this open when I work on AF and CU and etc, or should I close it as resolved?

In T305797#7847284, @Aklapper wrote:

@TerraCodes: Why does this create a problem? Could you elaborate on your use case, please?

In T282328#7196785, @Legoktm wrote:

Some related looking upstream issues are: https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/472 and https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/474

This might be a duplicate of T282328: Mailman 3: Changing email address seems to break subscription for listadmins list, as I'm looking through my emails and it seems I subscribed with two different emails a long time ago (and each a year apart), and then recently I changed all my subscriptions that were on the one email to the other.

I was poking around mailman and I noticed on https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/accounts/per-subscription-preferences/ it lists me as being subscribed twice? not sure if that's the reason it's having issues or not tho

In T235424#6820561, @TerraCodes wrote:

Not sure if it's related to ?action=protect or Pending changes, but the pending changes part of https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page?action=protect isn't in OOUI.

Not sure if it's related to ?action=protect or Pending changes, but the pending changes part of https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page?action=protect isn't in OOUI.

HI @Volker_E could you respond to my reply to your messages on my patch when you get a chance please?

In T248441#6271557, @Aklapper wrote:

@TerraCodes: I meant that it's better to ask questions about your patch in Gerrit in the discussion about the patch in Gerrit.

In T248441#6213620, @Aklapper wrote:

Patches is discussed in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/603941 I'd say.

In T248441#6207220, @Aklapper wrote:

@TerraCodes: Please provide a link to "CHANGELOG" to make sure we talk about the same thing.

@Aklapper would this be something that needs to go in the CHANGELOG file or nah? (and if so would I need to add it, or does someone else add them?)

This turns out to be pretty easy to do (atleast for MW core, I haven't tried messing with AbuseFilter or etc yet), so I'm gonna take a crack at this.

(chrome 83.0.4103.97 stable on windows 10)

Whoops, I meant to say it was a workaround, not a solution, in my previous message, but yeah, I wouldn't expect a non WMF wiki to use an external site that they didn't choose.

Would https://tools.wmflabs.org/whois be a good solution to the point about different sites being used as mentioned in the task description?

Yep its working, got a test email I set through, thanks for the help.

Yeah, and I'd like a way that doesn't feel hacky (like trying to match the url of a page), or hoping that the elements are in the same order everytime, which might not be true if you inject custom links.

Yeah I probably could have been clearer, I'll edit the task a bit. Also its not really a bug unless they're intentionally supposed to have IDs but don't, but I'll add steps to reproduce anyhow.

If we're doing this, should we also change editmyprivateinfo and editmyoptions and viewmyprivateinfo too?

In T246405#5925465, @JJMC89 wrote:

sysop can't edit site JS, only interface-admin.

Per the configs (CommonSettings InitialiseSettings), the differences between contentadmin and sysop are that contentadmin lacks:

• editinterface
• tboverride
• titleblacklistlog
• override-antispoof

Couldn't you just temporally add yourself to the bot usergroup?

In T30201#5884319, @Aklapper wrote:

That's likely with bugs.

I can reproduce this too (sometimes the username is bolded, but sometimes it isn't, looks like the page link is always bold tho)

Both Performer and Target fields are there for me, with text in them.

I can't reproduce this, so maybe it no longer exists?

I can't reproduce this, so maybe this issue no longer exists?

Is there anything that needs to be tested? Also could this issue be closed (per the above comment)?

I can't reproduce this, so perhaps this has been fixed?

I couldn't seem to reproduce this

I can't reproduce either

I can't seem to reproduce this, but I did notice

Seems to still be happening? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Certified_Translation

I don't have any console errors but the short url fails for me too

In T227699#5883568, @Krinkle wrote:

The bug is currently obscured on Wikimedia Commons. It looks like someone has overidden the "This entity" message for English to say "This page" instead.

My interface langauge is en-gb, which the community has not worked around for yet.

Try https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Somethingnonexistent?uselang=en-gb to see the problem again. And this shows it for logged-out users as well.

In T227699#5837193, @Krinkle wrote:

It's on the address in the task description for me, but that might be different for you given that "Foo" is no longer a normally non-existent gallery, it is now a formerly-existant gallery (someone created it, someone deleted it).

Try anything like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Somethingnonexistent.

---

EDIT: It seems to be different depending on whether the user is logged-in. For me in private browsing mode it correctly says "This page". When logged-in, it says "This entity".

Strange!

per last comment

In T862#5809863, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

In T862#5805846, @Aklapper wrote:

Not an issue anymore these days due to customization ( Auth > Customize Messages > Login Screen Instructions):

That's not the login screen I get when I browse in an incognito browser:

@Aklapper I thought the login page we have here on phab was custom and done by us? (I'm talking about the page where you select SUL or LDAP, not the actual login forum)

Could the button text be centered and make the buttons the same width?

I can't reproduce either (I switched from english to french)

You could try using ?safemode=1 which should disable user js and css and see if it still happens. @Schnark

Could you link the page its showing that on? When I try to reproduce it I don't see any message like that.

I can see properties on the page too, @Bugreporter does it still not show any results for you?

Maybe add an option to disable it as a wg* variable or as a user preference? That way wikis/users who want to disable it can, without fully removing the feature for people who want it.

(marking as resolved rather than invalid because I think the issue went away, rather than there not being an issue to begin with)

The only thing in the console when I test it on meta is JQMIGRATE: Migrate is installed with logging active, version 3.0.1, which I'm pretty sure isn't related to this.

In T239186#5699267, @Aklapper wrote:

Would it be possible to add a way to disable/hide it then?

That is already possible: You can write your own custom CSS to hide it.

Would it be possible to add a way to disable/hide it then? Maybe by moving the language settings into Special:Preferences with the rest of the preferences, or by adding a preference to hide the language sidebar when empty? Because I find it annoying thats its taking up space on my screen despite being empty and unless (since theres no languages in the section).

In T45956#5674756, @Reedy wrote:

In T45956#5674553, @TerraCodes wrote:

(this patch was a pain to get sent for review because I accidentally used the wrong email/name when committing it, why can't we use something thats easier to use like github or phab?)

Completely off topic ;)

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3042437/how-to-change-the-commit-author-for-one-specific-commit

(this patch was a pain to get sent for review because I accidentally used the wrong email/name when committing it, why can't we use something thats easier to use like github or phab?)

In T45956#5434873, @DannyS712 wrote:

@TerraCodes are you still planning to work on this?

Hm, something I thought of when suggesting this on another wiki farm was to make the signature global, but only if "use wikitext" wasn't checked. Maybe that would help here?