Estimated Global Proportions of Individuals With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021

Key Points

Question  Among individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and 2021, what proportion experienced common self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters 3 months after initial infection?

Findings  This observational analysis involved bayesian meta-regression and pooling of 54 studies and 2 medical record databases with data for 1.2 million individuals (from 22 countries) who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The modeled estimated proportion with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6.2%, including 3.7% for ongoing respiratory problems, 3.2% for persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, and 2.2% for cognitive problems after adjusting for health status before COVID-19.

Meaning  This study presents modeled estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Importance  Some individuals experience persistent symptoms after initial symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (often referred to as Long COVID).

Objective  To estimate the proportion of males and females with COVID-19, younger or older than 20 years of age, who had Long COVID symptoms in 2020 and 2021 and their Long COVID symptom duration.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Bayesian meta-regression and pooling of 54 studies and 2 medical record databases with data for 1.2 million individuals (from 22 countries) who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 54 studies, 44 were published and 10 were collaborating cohorts (conducted in Austria, the Faroe Islands, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US). The participant data were derived from the 44 published studies (10 501 hospitalized individuals and 42 891 nonhospitalized individuals), the 10 collaborating cohort studies (10 526 and 1906), and the 2 US electronic medical record databases (250 928 and 846 046). Data collection spanned March 2020 to January 2022.

Exposures  Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and 2021, estimated separately for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals aged 20 years or older by sex and for both sexes of nonhospitalized individuals younger than 20 years of age.

Results  A total of 1.2 million individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were included (mean age, 4-66 years; males, 26%-88%). In the modeled estimates, 6.2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 2.4%-13.3%) of individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters in 2020 and 2021, including 3.2% (95% UI, 0.6%-10.0%) for persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, 3.7% (95% UI, 0.9%-9.6%) for ongoing respiratory problems, and 2.2% (95% UI, 0.3%-7.6%) for cognitive problems after adjusting for health status before COVID-19, comprising an estimated 51.0% (95% UI, 16.9%-92.4%), 60.4% (95% UI, 18.9%-89.1%), and 35.4% (95% UI, 9.4%-75.1%), respectively, of Long COVID cases. The Long COVID symptom clusters were more common in women aged 20 years or older (10.6% [95% UI, 4.3%-22.2%]) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection than in men aged 20 years or older (5.4% [95% UI, 2.2%-11.7%]). Both sexes younger than 20 years of age were estimated to be affected in 2.8% (95% UI, 0.9%-7.0%) of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. The estimated mean Long COVID symptom cluster duration was 9.0 months (95% UI, 7.0-12.0 months) among hospitalized individuals and 4.0 months (95% UI, 3.6-4.6 months) among nonhospitalized individuals. Among individuals with Long COVID symptoms 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated 15.1% (95% UI, 10.3%-21.1%) continued to experience symptoms at 12 months.

Conclusions and Relevance  This study presents modeled estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Much of the attention on disease surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic has concentrated on the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospital admissions, and deaths. Less attention has been given to quantifying the risk for experiencing symptoms after the acute stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In October 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a clinical case definition for the post–COVID-19 condition as symptoms that are present 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection with a minimum duration of 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.¹ This is often referred to as Long COVID.

Postinfection fatigue syndromes have been described for other viruses and bacteria, including Ebola virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus.^2,3 Ongoing low-grade inflammation has been postulated to cause these symptoms, but the pathology remains largely unknown and treatments are primarily based on symptom relief.⁴ The consequences for affected individuals are substantial, and specialized clinics for individuals with Long COVID have arisen to respond to an increasing need for supportive and rehabilitative care.^5,6

A systematic review⁷ of 45 follow-up studies of individuals with COVID-19, of which only 3 had follow-up longer than 3 months, found 84 long-term symptoms with shortness of breath, fatigue, and sleep disorders or insomnia as the most common. Studies have reported most frequently on individual symptoms or counts of symptoms and have reported less frequently on symptom severity, overlapping symptoms, and symptom duration.^8-11

This study collated information on 3 common clusters of Long COVID symptoms largely based on detailed data from ongoing COVID-19 follow-up studies conducted in 10 countries (Austria, the Faroe Islands, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US), supplemented by published data from 44 studies and data from 2 medical record databases. From this pooled information on the occurrence of 3 Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems), estimates were made of the proportion of individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and at least 1 of the 3 symptom clusters 3 months after infection, and the duration of these symptom clusters was derived for 2020 and 2021.

This research was undertaken as part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study and used deidentified data. A waiver of informed consent was reviewed and approved by the University of Washington institutional review board.

The analysis comprised 5 components (Figure 1 and eFigure 1 in Supplement 1). First, the proportion of symptomatic survivors with 1 or more of the 3 symptom clusters of Long COVID (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, cognitive problems, or ongoing respiratory problems) and the key symptoms of fatigue, cognitive problems, and shortness of breath were extracted from 54 international cohort studies and 2 US medical record databases. Of the 10 collaborating cohort studies with individual case records available, 4 did not report on (1) excess risk of Long COVID symptom clusters compared with controls or (2) self-reported health status prior to COVID-19; therefore, these cohorts were adjusted by the ratio of excess risk of Long COVID symptoms to total symptoms from the 6 that reported both.

Second, the proportion of individuals with Long COVID symptom clusters after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were estimated using a bayesian meta-regression tool separately for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals. Third, estimates from the studies providing distributions of symptom cluster overlap and severity gradients of cognitive and respiratory problems were pooled.

Fourth, estimates of daily SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths due to SARS-CoV-2 infection were taken from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington COVID-19 statistical model.^12,13 The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was multiplied by the pooled estimate of the proportion of infections without symptoms, and then deaths were subtracted from the estimate of symptomatic cases to get the estimates by age, sex, and country for symptomatic survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fifth, the global estimates of symptomatic COVID-19 survivors were multiplied by the proportion of individuals experiencing at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

There were data from 54 studies (44 published studies and 10 collaborating cohort studies) and 2 medical record databases for individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data from the study populations ranged from a full account of all cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Faroe Islands to cases identified at health facilities, volunteers reporting symptoms in an app, and individuals enrolled in medical insurance. Individuals with Long COVID had new-onset or persisting symptoms 3 months after onset of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 that were not preexisting. This description aligns with the WHO clinical case definition of the post–COVID-19 condition, which is their preferred term for Long COVID.¹

The symptom clusters were selected based on reporting frequency in published studies and the ability to characterize them using health state descriptions from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The 3 Long COVID symptom clusters selected were (1) persistent fatigue with bodily pain (myalgia) or mood swings; (2) cognitive problems (forgetfulness or difficulty concentrating, commonly referred to as brain fog); and (3) ongoing respiratory problems (shortness of breath and persistent cough as the main symptoms). In addition, 2 severity levels for cognitive problems were selected as well as 3 severity levels for ongoing respiratory symptoms. The health states and corresponding symptom descriptions used for the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters appear in Table 1.

A systematic review was conducted of the 44 published studies on the long-term symptoms after COVID-19 (eTable 1 and eFigures 2-3 in Supplement 1 and Supplement 2). The published studies were supplemented with more detailed individual-level data from the 10 collaborating cohort studies (eTable 1 and eFigure 4 in Supplement 1) and data from 2 US medical record databases (eTables 1-2 in Supplement 1).

For the 10 collaborating cohort studies, algorithms were developed and applied to extract the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters by symptom severity level to most closely match the symptom descriptions in Table 1 (additional information appears in eSection 1 in Supplement 1). Data from 4 of the collaborating cohort studies that did not report pre–COVID-19 health status were adjusted downward based on the ratio of excess risk of Long COVID symptoms to total symptoms reported from the 6 collaborating cohort studies with available individual-level data on pre–COVID-19 health status (eTable 3 in Supplement 1).^14-20 Respondents with insufficient follow-up data to apply the algorithms were excluded. All extracted data used in the analyses appear in Supplement 3. Data also were extracted from the 44 published follow-up studies reporting on the key defining symptoms of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters: fatigue, shortness of breath, and cognitive dysfunction.

The main outcome was the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and 12 months after COVID-19 illness. Additional outcomes included the duration and relative severity of the Long COVID symptom clusters.

Bayesian meta-regression of the data was performed using the Meta-Regression Tool (MRTool) version 0.0.1 (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington) and R package MR-BRT 002 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with tabulated data from each study on the proportion of individuals who experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters during follow-up.²¹ Indicator variables for male and female sex and study-level random effects were added. Separate models were run for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals with an indicator variable for those who were admitted to the ICU in the hospitalized model and for individuals younger than 20 years of age in the nonhospitalized model (eSection 2, eTables 4-9, and eFigures 5-10 in Supplement 1). The statistical differences between the proportion of individuals by sex and age (<20 years or ≥20 years) were determined by estimating the difference at each of 1000 draws of the posterior and presented as means with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) and deemed statistically significant if the full range of the 95% UI was either negative or positive.

The overlap of 2 or 3 Long COVID symptom clusters and the severity gradients of the cognitive and respiratory clusters were pooled using the MRTool with indicator variables for individuals who were hospitalized and study-level random effects (eSection 3, eTables 10-12, and eFigures 11-13 in Supplement 1).

The Long COVID symptom cluster duration values for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals were derived from the final proportion models having at least 1 symptom cluster (eSection 2 in Supplement 1).

The estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were taken from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington COVID-19 statistical model, which is a statistical susceptible, exposed, infected, and removed compartmental model used to fit data on the daily reported deaths, hospitalizations, and SARS-CoV-2 infections; seroprevalence; and excess mortality data.^12,13 The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington COVID-19 statistical model used an ensemble modeling strategy selecting predictive covariate combinations that best accounted for input data variance.

For this analysis, Long COVID was assumed to occur only in those with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (eSection 4 in Supplement 1). Studies were selected from a published review²² that estimated the proportion of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in representative samples screened with antibody testing (Supplement 3). The logit-transformed proportion of individuals with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was pooled from 6 studies in a random-effects meta-analysis (eFigure 14 and eTable 13 in Supplement 1), and 1 minus the pooled proportion was multiplied by the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections to estimate the incidence of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections (eFigure 15 in Supplement 1). Deaths were then subtracted from the number of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections to obtain the number of individuals who survived and had symptomatic infection separately for those needing care in a general hospital ward or in the ICU and those not needing such care (eFigures 16-17 in Supplement 1).

The individuals who survived were multiplied by the estimated proportion of individuals who were either hospitalized or not hospitalized with each Long COVID symptom cluster at 3 months (eSection 5 in Supplement 1). Uncertainty was propagated through 1000 posterior draws of every stage of the analysis. The 95% UIs are presented for all estimates based on the 25th and 975th values of the ordered 1000 draws of the final posterior distributions.

To quantify what proportion of cases with Long COVID symptoms would be missed by concentrating on the 3 large symptom clusters, the most detailed and largest cohort with individual records available from Russia was further scrutinized.²⁰ Reported symptoms were tabulated among cases who reported not having recovered from COVID-19 and who reported worse overall health status on the 5-dimension EuroQol 5L index measure compared with their rating using the same measure before having SARS-CoV-2 infection. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate symptom duration using all available data rather than limiting the symptom duration model input data to studies with multiple follow-up points.

This analysis complies with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting²³ (Supplement 4).

This observational analysis involved bayesian meta-regression and pooling of 54 studies and 2 medical record databases with data for 1.2 million individuals (from 22 countries) who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean age range among the data sources, 4-66 years; range for proportion of males, 26%-88%). The participant data were derived from 44 published studies (10 501 hospitalized individuals and 42 891 nonhospitalized individuals), 10 collaborating cohort studies (10 526 hospitalized individuals and 1906 nonhospitalized individuals with COVID-19), and 2 US electronic medical record databases (250 928 hospitalized individuals and 846 046 nonhospitalized individuals) (Table 2,^24-74 eTable 1 in Supplement 1, and Supplement 3).

For data extraction in the 2 US electronic medical record databases, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used for cognitive symptoms, fatigue, and respiratory symptoms (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). Of the 10 collaborating cohort studies, 3 included individuals who were younger than 20 years of age. Of the 12 432 participants in these collaborating cohort studies, 203 did not have responses required by the Long COVID symptom cluster algorithms and were excluded.

An estimated 6.2% (95% UI, 2.4%-13.3%) of individuals with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection who survived the acute episode experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters (Table 3). The estimated proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters was greater in those who were admitted to ICUs (43.1% [95% UI, 22.6%-65.2%]) and in those who were admitted to general hospital wards (27.5% [95% UI, 12.1%-47.8%]) than in those who were not hospitalized (5.7% [95% UI, 1.9%-13.1%]), with higher proportions among females than males (Table 3 and eTable 14 in Supplement 1).

Among individuals who were hospitalized, the estimated mean Long COVID symptom duration was 9.0 months (95% UI, 7.0-12.0 months) based on data from 6 studies (conducted in 5 high-income countries and in 1 upper-middle-income country) with 8660 respondents with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (eFigure 5 in Supplement 1). Among individuals who were not hospitalized, the estimated mean Long COVID symptom duration was 4.0 months (95% UI, 3.6-4.6 months) based data from 4 studies (conducted in 4 high-income countries) with 4918 participants with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Of individuals with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated 3.2% (95% UI, 0.6%-10.0%) had persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, 3.7% (95% UI, 0.9%-9.6%) had ongoing respiratory problems, and 2.2% (95% UI, 0.3%-7.6%) had cognitive problems after adjusting for health status before COVID-19, comprising an estimated 51.0% (95% UI, 16.9%-92.4%), 60.4% (95% UI, 18.9%-89.1%), and 35.4% (95% UI, 9.4%-75.1%), respectively, of Long COVID cases. In an estimated 38.4% (95% UI, 7.94%-96.0%) of Long COVID cases, 2 or all 3 of the symptom clusters overlapped (Figure 2 and eTable 15 in Supplement 1).

Globally, an estimated 63.2% (95% UI, 59.7%-66.3%) of individuals with Long COVID were female. The estimated risk of Long COVID at 3 months was lower in individuals with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection who were not hospitalized and were younger than 20 years of age (2.7% [95% UI, 0.8%-6.7%]) than in those aged 20 years or older for both men (4.8% [95% UI, 1.5%-11.3%]) and women (9.9% [95% UI, 3.4%-21.2%]) (Table 3 and eTable 14 in Supplement 1). The difference in the estimated risk of Long COVID between individuals who were younger than 20 years of age and men aged 20 years or older was 2.0% (95% UI, 0.7%-4.6%), the difference between those younger than 20 years of age and women aged 20 years or older was 7.2% (95% UI, 2.6%-15.1%), and the difference between men and women aged 20 years or older was 5.1% (95% UI, 1.8-10.9), which were statistically significant differences.

Among COVID-19 survivors who developed Long COVID in 2020 and 2021 and had symptoms 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated 15.1% (95% UI, 10.3%-21.1%) continued to have persistent symptoms at 12 months (Table 3). The global new cases with Long COVID symptom clusters by sex and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection appear in eTable 16 in Supplement 1. The global counts of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and cases of Long COVID by country appear in eTable 17 in Supplement 1.

The detailed analysis of the Russian cohort found that the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters were present in 136 of 198 individuals reporting not having recovered and having worse general health status than before COVID-19 (eTable 18 in Supplement 1). The majority (48 of 62 persons) of those in the Russian cohort not covered by the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters defined in this article reported fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive symptoms but did not get included by the study’s algorithm because they reported no worsening in their ability to carry out usual activities.

In the sensitivity analysis with all data incorporated into the duration models rather than only studies with follow-up at multiple time points, the length of Long COVID increased slightly from 9.0 months (95% UI, 7.0-12.0 months) to 9.1 months (95% UI, 6.9-12.1 months) for individuals who were hospitalized and increased slightly from 4.0 months (95% UI, 3.6-4.6 months) to 4.7 months (95% UI, 4.0-5.4 months) for individuals who were not hospitalized and the proportion of Long COVID symptom clusters remained stable (eTable 19 in Supplement 1).

This modeling study estimated that among patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections who survived the acute phase in 2020 and 2021, 6.2% experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after acute infection onset. The risk of Long COVID was greater in females and in those who needed hospitalization for the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly among those needing ICU care.

The pattern of Long COVID symptoms by sex is distinct from that of severe acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, which tends to affect more males (eFigure 15 in Supplement 1).¹³ This difference suggests that the underlying mechanism of Long COVID may be different from that of the severity of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. In general, women respond to viral infections with less severe disease and mount higher antibody responses but also have higher rates of adverse reactions to vaccinations and antiviral drugs; X chromosome–linked genes are thought to influence susceptibility to viral infections as well as autoimmune diseases, lending support to autoimmune processes playing a role in the development of Long COVID.⁷⁵

A prolonged state of low-grade infection with a hyperimmune response, coagulation or vasculopathy, endocrine and autonomic dysregulation, and a maladaptation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 pathway have been postulated as the underlying pathophysiology of Long COVID.⁷⁶ Deconditioning due to prolonged immobilization during hospitalization may compound these problems.⁷⁷

The analyses in this study are based on the WHO case definition that stipulates a minimum period of 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection before referring to ongoing symptoms as Long COVID or post–COVID-19 condition. Others have suggested a threshold of 3 weeks to define a case of Long COVID, arguing that no competent virus has been replicated beyond 3 weeks of infection, but periods of up to 12 weeks have been suggested to define the start of Long COVID.^76,78,79 This analysis accounts for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections through the end of 2021 and therefore does not cover the Omicron variant wave. Based on data from the UK COVID Symptom Study,⁸⁰ a reduced odds of Long COVID symptoms between 0.24 and 0.50, depending on time since the last vaccination, was found for the Omicron variants compared with the Delta variants.

The estimated decline in reporting for any of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters during follow-up among individuals not hospitalized suggests that the majority of Long COVID cases resolve. It is not yet clear if there is a smaller proportion of individuals, especially among those hospitalized for the acute episode of SARS-CoV-2 infection, who develop a more chronic course of Long COVID. Given that the longest follow-up among the included studies was 12 months, the true long-term pattern of symptom persistence for Long COVID will only be revealed as studies conduct longer follow-up. The time-limited course of Long COVID in most people has led to some recommendations to provide rehabilitative support in the community, with specialist rehabilitation services required only for those with protracted and more severe problems, particularly when compounded by postintensive care syndrome.^78,81

Quantifying the number of individuals with Long COVID may help policy makers ensure adequate access to services to guide people toward recovery, return to the workplace or school, and restore their mental health and social life. The large number of individuals with Long COVID may provide insights into phenotypical and genotypical characteristics, potentially leading to treatments and predictors of postacute disease syndromes, including those known to occur after other infectious diseases and intensive care for other critical illnesses. Postinfection fatigue syndrome has been previously reported for the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in 1918 and SARS-CoV-1 in 2003 and after the Ebola epidemic in West Africa in 2014. Similar symptoms have been reported after other viral infections including the Epstein-Barr virus, mononucleosis, and dengue as well as after nonviral infections such as Q fever, Lyme disease, and giardiasis.⁸²

The collaborative structure of this study helped to provide consistent approaches in dealing with the diverse study methods and instruments used. It led to a definition of Long COVID symptom clusters and quantifying overlap among the symptom clusters. A key step was to correct for overreporting from studies that did not have a comparison with previous health status, leveraging information from the cohort studies that explicitly asked respondents to recall their pre–COVID-19 health status or existence of symptoms. In addition, the large US health insurance databases enabled identification of controls matched on demographic and disease characteristics and thus correct for the occurrence of these symptoms unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This may in part explain why these estimates of Long COVID are lower than the estimates often reported in the literature. Direct comparisons are unavailable because the Long COVID symptom clusters defined for this study have not been reported by others.

This study has several limitations. First, the 95% UIs around the estimates are wide, reflecting limited and heterogeneous data.

Second, separate algorithms had to be formulated for each contributing study to achieve consistency in the case definitions of the 3 chosen Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, cognitive problems, and ongoing respiratory problems). Efforts to achieve standardization of questions and instruments for studies of Long COVID are underway.^1,83 This would make pooling estimates among studies less prone to measurement bias.

Third, it was assumed that Long COVID follows a similar course in all countries and territories. Data were used from western European countries, Australia, China, India, Iran, Israel, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, and the US. Additional reports from Brazil and Bangladesh suggest that Long COVID similarly affects people in other parts of the world.^84,85 As more information becomes available, any geographical variation in the occurrence or severity of Long COVID could be explored. The duration estimates for Long COVID relied on studies from high-income countries only. With repeated follow-up being planned in many of the studies, and with new studies being conducted, it should become clearer whether the findings related to the duration of Long COVID are generalizable.

Fourth, apart from the symptoms and Long COVID symptom clusters, new diseases and events have been reported to occur more frequently in patients after COVID-19 diagnosis, including cardiovascular complications like myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, and thromboembolic events as well as kidney, liver, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and skin disorders.^86-88 The data sources to quantify these COVID-19–related changes may not yet be sufficient due to lags in the reporting of clinical informatics data, disease registries, and surveys that form the basis of estimation for such diseases.

Fifth, it was assumed that Long COVID only affects those with a symptomatic course of the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. The participating cohorts included few people with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study from the Faroe Islands observed 22 individuals with fully asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, the study from Italy included 53, the study from Switzerland included 182, and the study from the US included 9.^14,18,24,29 Long COVID was not identified among any individuals who were followed up in the Italy and US cohorts. In the Faroe Islands and Swiss cohorts, 3 individuals and 5 individuals, respectively, developed at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters during follow-up. The total number of individuals with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection followed up in these studies was low and, to be cautious, these individuals were excluded from calculations in this study. If Long COVID symptoms do occur in those who have an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, the estimates would be higher.

Sixth, the analyses are based on 3 commonly reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, cognitive problems, or ongoing respiratory problems) but not for other common symptoms reported as Long COVID. The main symptoms of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters are those that reached the highest degree of consensus in the Delphi process that the WHO used to create a clinical case definition for the post–COVID-19 condition.¹ The detailed analysis of the most complete cohort from Russia suggested that two-thirds of individuals who were reported as not having recovered or being worse off than before COVID-19 were captured by the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters included in this analysis, whereas most of the remaining one-third of individuals were reported as having the same symptoms but at a less severe level by which the symptoms did not interfere with the ability to perform usual activities (eSection 4 and eTable 18 in Supplement 1).²⁰ The estimates, therefore, do not reflect the burden of the full range of Long COVID outcomes.

This study presents modeled estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Corresponding Author: Theo Vos, PhD, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195 (tvos@uw.edu).

Accepted for Publication: September 25, 2022.

Published Online: October 10, 2022. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.18931

Authors/Global Burden of Disease Long COVID Collaborators: Sarah Wulf Hanson, PhD; Cristiana Abbafati, PhD; Joachim G. Aerts, MD; Ziyad Al-Aly, MD; Charlie Ashbaugh, MA; Tala Ballouz, MD; Oleg Blyuss, PhD; Polina Bobkova, MD; Gouke Bonsel, PhD; Svetlana Borzakova, MD; Danilo Buonsenso, MD; Denis Butnaru, PhD; Austin Carter, MPH; Helen Chu, MD; Cristina De Rose, MD; Mohamed Mustafa Diab, MD; Emil Ekbom, MD; Maha El Tantawi, PhD; Victor Fomin, PhD; Robert Frithiof, PhD; Aysylu Gamirova, BSc; Petr V. Glybochko, PhD; Juanita A. Haagsma, PhD; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard, PhD; Erin B. Hamilton, MPH; Gabrielle Harris, PhD; Majanka H. Heijenbrok-Kal, PhD; Raimund Helbok, MD; Merel E. Hellemons, PhD; David Hillus, MD; Susanne M. Huijts, PhD; Michael Hultström, PhD; Waasila Jassat, MMed; Florian Kurth, MD; Ing-Marie Larsson, PhD; Miklós Lipcsey, PhD; Chelsea Liu, MSc; Callan D. Loflin, BA; Andrei Malinovschi, PhD; Wenhui Mao, PhD; Lyudmila Mazankova, MD; Denise McCulloch, MD; Dominik Menges, MD; Noushin Mohammadifard, PhD; Daniel Munblit, PhD; Nikita A. Nekliudov, MD; Osondu Ogbuoji, ScD; Ismail M. Osmanov, MD; José L. Peñalvo, PhD; Maria Skaalum Petersen, PhD; Milo A. Puhan, PhD; Mujibur Rahman, MD; Verena Rass, PhD; Nickolas Reinig, BS; Gerard M. Ribbers, PhD; Antonia Ricchiuto, MD; Sten Rubertsson, PhD; Elmira Samitova, MD; Nizal Sarrafzadegan, MD; Anastasia Shikhaleva, BSc; Kyle E. Simpson, BS; Dario Sinatti, MD; Joan B. Soriano, MD; Ekaterina Spiridonova, BSc; Fridolin Steinbeis, MD; Andrey A. Svistunov, PhD; Piero Valentini, MD; Brittney J. van de Water, PhD; Rita van den Berg-Emons, PhD; Ewa Wallin, PhD; Martin Witzenrath, MD; Yifan Wu, MPH; Hanzhang Xu, PhD; Thomas Zoller, PhD; Christopher Adolph, PhD; James Albright, BS; Joanne O. Amlag, MPH; Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, PhD; Bree L. Bang-Jensen, MA; Catherine Bisignano, MPH; Rachel Castellano, MA; Emma Castro, MS; Suman Chakrabarti, MA; James K. Collins, BS; Xiaochen Dai, PhD; Farah Daoud, BS; Carolyn Dapper, MA; Amanda Deen, MPH; Bruce B. Duncan, MD; Megan Erickson, MA; Samuel B. Ewald, MS; Alize J. Ferrari, PhD; Abraham D. Flaxman, PhD; Nancy Fullman, MPH; Amiran Gamkrelidze, PhD; John R. Giles, PhD; Gaorui Guo, MPH; Simon I. Hay, DPhil; Jiawei He, MSc; Monika Helak, BA; Erin N. Hulland, MPH; Maia Kereselidze, PhD; Kris J. Krohn, MPH; Alice Lazzar-Atwood, BSc; Akiaja Lindstrom, MEpi; Rafael Lozano, MD; Deborah Carvalho Malta, PhD; Johan Månsson, MS; Ana M. Mantilla Herrera, PhD; Ali H. Mokdad, PhD; Lorenzo Monasta, DSc; Shuhei Nomura, PhD; Maja Pasovic, MEd; David M. Pigott, PhD; Robert C. Reiner Jr, PhD; Grace Reinke, MA; Antonio Luiz P. Ribeiro, MD; Damian Francesco Santomauro, PhD; Aleksei Sholokhov, MSc; Emma Elizabeth Spurlock, MPH; Rebecca Walcott, MPH; Ally Walker, MA; Charles Shey Wiysonge, MD; Peng Zheng, PhD; Janet Prvu Bettger, DSc; Christopher J. L. Murray, DPhil; Theo Vos, PhD.

Affiliations of Authors/Global Burden of Disease Long COVID Collaborators: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle (Wulf Hanson, Ashbaugh, Carter, Hamilton, Reinig, Simpson, Wu, Albright, Amlag, Aravkin, Bang-Jensen, Bisignano, Castellano, Castro, Chakrabarti, Collins, Dai, Daoud, Dapper, Deen, Erickson, Ewald, Ferrari, Flaxman, Fullman, Giles, Guo, Hay, He, Helak, Hulland, Krohn, Lazzar-Atwood, Lozano, Månsson, Mokdad, Pasovic, Pigott, Reiner Jr, Reinke, Santomauro, Sholokhov, Spurlock, Walker, Zheng, Murray, Vos); Department of Juridical and Economic Studies, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy (Abbafati); Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Aerts, Hellemons); John T. Milliken Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Al-Aly); Clinical Epidemiology Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, St Louis, Missouri (Al-Aly); Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland (Ballouz, Menges, Puhan); Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England (Blyuss); Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Blyuss, Munblit); Clinical Medicine (Pediatric Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Bobkova, Shikhaleva); EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Bonsel); Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow (Borzakova, Osmanov); Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia (Borzakova); Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic IRCCS, Rome, Italy (Buonsenso, De Rose, Sinatti, Valentini); Global Health Research Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (Buonsenso); I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Butnaru); Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Chu); Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Diab, Mao); Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Diab); Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (Ekbom); Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt (El Tantawi); Rector’s Office, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Fomin); Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (Frithiof, Hultström, Larsson, Lipcsey, Rubertsson, Wallin); Clinical Medicine (General Medicine Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Gamirova, Nekliudov, Spiridonova); Administration Department, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (Glybochko, Svistunov); Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Haagsma); Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (Haghjooy Javanmard); School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Harris, Loflin); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Heijenbrok-Kal, Ribbers, van den Berg-Emons); Neurorehabilitation, Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Heijenbrok-Kal); Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Helbok, Rass); Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany (Hillus, Steinbeis, Zoller); Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Huijts); Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (Hultström); Department of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa (Jassat); Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany (Kurth, Witzenrath); Department of Clinical Research and Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht Institute of Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany (Kurth); Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts (Liu); Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (Malinovschi); Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Mao, Ogbuoji); Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow (Mazankova, Samitova); Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (McCulloch); Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (Mohammadifard, Sarrafzadegan); National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, England (Munblit); ZA Bashlyaeva Children’s Municipal Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia (Osmanov, Samitova); Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium (Peñalvo); Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (Peñalvo); Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, Faroese Hospital System, Torshavn, Faroe Islands (Petersen); Centre of Health Science, University of Faroe Islands, Torshavn (Petersen); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Puhan); Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Rahman); Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (Ricchiuto); Department of Surgical Sciences, Hedenstierna Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (Rubertsson); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (Sarrafzadegan); Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (Soriano); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias (Center for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases Network), Madrid, Spain (Soriano); Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts (van de Water); Nursing and Midwifery Department, Seed Global Health, Boston, Massachusetts (van de Water); German Center for Lung Research, Berlin (Witzenrath); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Xu); Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle (Adolph); Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Adolph); Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle (Aravkin); Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Aravkin, Dai, Flaxman, Hay, Lozano, Mokdad, Pigott, Reiner Jr, Zheng, Murray, Vos); Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle (Chakrabarti, Hulland); Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (Duncan); School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia (Ferrari, Lindstrom, Mantilla Herrera, Santomauro); National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia (Gamkrelidze, Kereselidze); School of Public Health, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia (Lindstrom); Department of Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (Malta); West Moreton Hospital Health Services, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia (Mantilla Herrera); Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Burlo Garofolo Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy (Monasta); Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan (Nomura); Department of Global Health Policy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Nomura); Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (Ribeiro); Centre of Telehealth, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (Ribeiro); Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia (Santomauro); Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Spurlock); Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle (Walcott); Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town (Wiysonge); HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban (Wiysonge); Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Bettger).

Author Contributions: Drs Wulf Hanson and Vos had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Bettger, Murray, and Vos are co–senior authors.

Concept and design: Wulf Hanson, Butnaru, Diab, Hultström, Mao, Ogbuoji, Valentini, Hay, Kereselidze, Mokdad, Sholokhov, Spurlock, Bettger, Vos.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Wulf Hanson, Abbafati, Aerts, Al-Aly, Ashbaugh, Ballouz, Blyuss, Bobkova, Bonsel, Borzakova, Buonsenso, Carter, Chu, De Rose, Diab, Ekbom, El Tantawi, Fomin, Frithiof, Gamirova, Glybochko, Haagsma, Haghjooy Javanmard, Hamilton, Harris, Heijenbrok-Kal, Helbok, Hellemons, Hillus, Huijts, Hultström, Jassat, Kurth, Larsson, Lipcsey, Liu, Loflin, Malinovschi, Mao, Mazankova, McCulloch, Menges, Mohammadifard, Munblit, Nekliudov, Ogbuoji, Osmanov, Peñalvo, Petersen, Puhan, Rahman, Rass, Reinig, Ribbers, Ricchiuto, Rubertsson, Samitova, Sarrafzadegan, Shikhaleva, Simpson, Sinatti, Soriano, Spiridonova, Steinbeis, Svistunov, van de Water, van den Berg-Emons, Wallin, Witzenrath, Wu, Xu, Zoller, Adolph, Albright, Amlag, Aravkin, Bang-Jensen, Bisignano, Castellano, Castro, Chakrabarti, Collins, Dai, Daoud, Dapper, Deen, Duncan, Erickson, Ewald, Ferrari, Flaxman, Fullman, Gamkrelidze, Giles, Guo, He, Helak, Hulland, Kereselidze, Krohn, Lazzar-Atwood, Lindstrom, Lozano, Malta, Månsson, Mantilla Herrera, Mokdad, Monasta, Nomura, Pasovic, Pigott, Reiner, Reinke, Ribeiro, Santomauro, Spurlock, Walcott, Walker, Wiysonge, Zheng, Bettger, Murray, Vos.

Drafting of the manuscript: Wulf Hanson, Bobkova, Butnaru, Carter, Fomin, Gamirova, Glybochko, Helbok, Loflin, Reinig, Ricchiuto, Shikhaleva, Simpson, Sinatti, Spiridonova, Svistunov, Wu, Albright, Amlag, Castellano, He, Krohn, Lindstrom, Mokdad, Murray, Vos.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wulf Hanson, Abbafati, Aerts, Al-Aly, Ashbaugh, Ballouz, Blyuss, Bonsel, Borzakova, Buonsenso, Chu, De Rose, Diab, Ekbom, El Tantawi, Frithiof, Haagsma, Haghjooy Javanmard, Hamilton, Harris, Heijenbrok-Kal, Helbok, Hellemons, Hillus, Huijts, Hultström, Jassat, Kurth, Larsson, Lipcsey, Liu, Loflin, Malinovschi, Mao, Mazankova, McCulloch, Menges, Mohammadifard, Munblit, Nekliudov, Ogbuoji, Osmanov, Peñalvo, Petersen, Puhan, Rahman, Rass, Ribbers, Rubertsson, Samitova, Sarrafzadegan, Soriano, Steinbeis, Valentini, van de Water, van den Berg-Emons, Wallin, Witzenrath, Xu, Zoller, Adolph, Aravkin, Bang-Jensen, Bisignano, Castro, Chakrabarti, Collins, Dai, Daoud, Dapper, Deen, Duncan, Erickson, Ewald, Ferrari, Flaxman, Fullman, Gamkrelidze, Giles, Guo, Hay, Helak, Hulland, Kereselidze, Krohn, Lazzar-Atwood, Lozano, Malta, Månsson, Mantilla Herrera, Mokdad, Monasta, Nomura, Pasovic, Pigott, Reiner, Reinke, Ribeiro, Santomauro, Sholokhov, Spurlock, Walcott, Walker, Wiysonge, Zheng, Bettger, Murray, Vos.

Statistical analysis: Wulf Hanson, Blyuss, Bonsel, Buonsenso, Carter, Diab, Haagsma, Heijenbrok-Kal, Hultström, Kurth, Ogbuoji, Ricchiuto, Simpson, Soriano, Wu, Albright, Aravkin, Castellano, Castro, Collins, Dai, Flaxman, Giles, Guo, He, Kereselidze, Lazzar-Atwood, Mokdad, Pigott, Reiner, Spurlock, Zheng, Vos.

Obtained funding: Frithiof, Hultström, Kurth, Ogbuoji, Petersen, Puhan, Ribbers, van den Berg-Emons, Witzenrath, Hay, Mokdad, Pigott.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Wulf Hanson, Ashbaugh, Borzakova, Buonsenso, Butnaru, De Rose, Diab, Ekbom, Haghjooy Javanmard, Hamilton, Harris, Hillus, Kurth, Larsson, Lipcsey, Malinovschi, Mao, Mohammadifard, Munblit, Nekliudov, Ogbuoji, Osmanov, Peñalvo, Puhan, Rahman, Reinig, Samitova, Steinbeis, Valentini, Wallin, Witzenrath, Wu, Adolph, Amlag, Bang-Jensen, Chakrabarti, Collins, Daoud, Deen, Flaxman, Gamkrelidze, Guo, Hay, Helak, Krohn, Månsson, Mantilla Herrera, Mokdad, Monasta, Nomura, Pigott, Reinke, Ribeiro, Santomauro, Spurlock, Walcott, Walker, Wiysonge, Zheng.

Supervision: Wulf Hanson, Abbafati, Chu, Haghjooy Javanmard, Helbok, Hultström, Kurth, Mazankova, Munblit, Puhan, Rahman, Ribbers, Valentini, Zoller, Amlag, Daoud, Hay, Kereselidze, Mokdad, Pigott, Murray, Vos.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Bobkova, Munblit, and Svistunov and Mss Gamirova, Shikhaleva, and Spiridonova reported receiving grants and contracts paid to Sechenov University from the British Embassy in Moscow for the StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients 2020-2021. Dr Haagsma reported receiving grants from the EuroQol Foundation. Dr Lipcsey reported receiving grants from and having contracts with Hjärt-Lungfonden (Swedish Heart Lung Foundation) and being a member of data and safety monitoring boards for the PROFLO and COVID-19 Hyperbaric Oxygen randomized clinical trials. Dr Munblit reported receiving grants paid to Sechenov University from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the UK Research and Innovation/National Institute for Health Research; receiving personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Bayer; and having unpaid leadership positions as co-chair of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium Global Pediatric Long COVID Working Group and co-lead of the PC-COS (Post-COVID Condition Core Outcomes) Project. Dr Petersen reported being on the board of the Faroese National Data Protection Authority and receiving equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise Co Ltd. Dr Puhan reported receiving support from the University of Zurich Foundation and the Department of Health, Canton of Zurich. Dr Flaxman reported having stock options in Agathos Ltd and receiving personal fees from Janssen, Swiss Re, Merck for Mothers, and Sanofi. Ms Fullman reported receiving personal fees from the World Health Organization and receiving funding from Gates Ventures. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: Erasmus University Medical Center received funding from the ZonMW COVID-19 Programme, Laurens (the Netherlands), and Rijndam Rehabilitation. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Uppsala University received funding from the Knut and Alice Wallenburg Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Kidney Foundation, the Swedish Society of Medicine, and the Swedish Research Council. The Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research received funding from the Queensland Department of Health. The Iran National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Health Researchers of Iran, and the World Health Organization provided funding for Drs Haghjooy Javanmard, Mohammadifard, and Sarrafzadegan. Cooperation’s p/f Krunborg and Borgartun, the Velux Foundation, the Faroese Research Council, the Faroese Parkinson’s Association, and the Faroese Health Insurance Fund provided funding for Dr Petersen. The National Institute on Aging and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities provided funding for Dr Xu. The Benificus Foundation provided funding for Dr Adolph. The National Science Foundation provided funding for Drs Aravkin and Reiner. The Ministry of Health (Rome, Italy) and the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo (Trieste, Italy) provided funding for Dr Monasta. The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan provided funding for Dr Nomura. The South African Medical Research Council provided funding for Dr Wiysonge.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders/sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 5.

Additional Contributions: We thank the researchers, health care professionals, caregivers, and people experiencing Long COVID who have shared their knowledge and experiences with us.