According to a survey ended February 2024, 54 percent of responding in the United States claimed that generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources used to provide final results. The main argument is that such results are reliant on work done by others. While 32 percent of respondents were uncertain, only 14 percent claimed generative AI programs do not need to credit sources because they rely on information widely available online.
Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024
Characteristic
Share of respondents
Needs to credit sources used to generate results because they rely on work done by others
54%
Does need to credit sources used to generate results because they rely on widely available online information
Profit from the additional features of your individual account
Currently, you are using a shared account. To use individual functions (e.g., mark statistics as favourites, set
statistic alerts) please log in with your personal account.
If you are an admin, please authenticate by logging in again.
Learn more about how Statista can support your business.
X (Twitter). (March 26, 2024). Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024 [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/
X (Twitter). "Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024." Chart. March 26, 2024. Statista. Accessed November 26, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/
X (Twitter). (2024). Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024. Statista. Statista Inc.. Accessed: November 26, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/
X (Twitter). "Share of Adults in The United States Who Think Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gai) Programs Should Credit Reviewed Sources as of February 2024." Statista, Statista Inc., 26 Mar 2024, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/
X (Twitter), Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024 Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/ (last visited November 26, 2024)
Share of adults in the United States who think generative artificial intelligence (GAI) programs should credit reviewed sources as of February 2024 [Graph], X (Twitter), March 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461663/us-adults-gai-should-credit-sources/
