It's tough for me between this and the CSL.
BMW M4 GTS specs
Price in Europe | €142,600 - €168,100 |
Price in US | $135,195 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1599-1635 kg (3525-3605 lbs) |
Introduced | 2016 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 48.8-9.7 l/100 km (5-24 mpg US / 6-29 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 199 - 298 g/km |
Insurance group | 50 / 50 |
Views | 64.7k |
Submitted by | FastestLaps |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 40 kph | 1.4 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.6 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.0 s |
0 - 80 kph | 2.9 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.7 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.2 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.4 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.5 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.8 s |
0 - 180 kph | 10.0 s |
0 - 200 kph | 11.5 s |
0 - 250 kph | 21.6 s |
100 m | 5.9 s |
1000 m | 21.5 s @ 255.0 kph |
0 - 60 mph | 3.5 s |
0 - 100 mph | 7.9 s |
0 - 130 mph | 13.7 s |
0 - 150 mph | 20.3 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s @ 102.5 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.7 s @ 121.0 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 306 kph (190 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.7 s @ 804 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.76 g (8 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 72.8 kph (45.2 mph) |
36m slalom | 138.0 kph (85.7 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.07 g (10 m/s²) |
Downforce @ 200 kph | 55 kg (121 lbs) |
100 kph - 0 | 31 m (102 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 119 m (389 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 30 m (100 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Inline 6 turbo |
Displacement | 3.0 l (182 ci / 2979 cc) |
Power | 500 ps (493 bhp / 368 kw) @ 6250 rpm |
Torque | 600 Nm (443 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm |
Power / liter | 168 ps (166 hp) |
Power / weight | 311 ps (307 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 373 Nm (275 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 25 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 17 ps |
Transmission | DCT |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Rolling acceleration
60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.3 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 4.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.6 s |
80 - 120 kph (7) | 9.6 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 6.7 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 9.2 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 11.8 s |
80 - 160 kph (7) | 18.7 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.0 s |
M4 GTS competition
JailBreak 5m ago
Even though this car is in that stage where it's "older" yet still not old enough to be considered "old cool" it's an underrated thing for sure.
I was given the opportunity to drive one of these on the canyons recently and the way it handles is sublime you don't expect it from this thing. It has a level of aggression you don't get from the regular M4. The only other F8X I was able to drive was a manual, but I completely get the hype behind the DCT on these cars. It gives the M4 a much more sporty/racey feeling compared to the ZF 8-Speed in the G8X cars. Even though the wing does look quite tacky and aftermarket, you can definitely feel the downforce it provides in tough corners where the regular M4 would struggle.
Honestly, at around the 70-80k range where they are right now (In my area at least) it's a good bargain for a fun track car that's extremely rare, being far rarer than most limited edition supercars while also being a complete blast to drive.
Hoppelmoppel123 5y ago
AutoBild Sportscars (7/July 2016):
60-100 kph (4): 3.3 s
60-100 kph (5): 4.9 s
80-120 kph (5): 4.0 s
80-120 kph (6): 5.6 s
flt158 8y ago
I recently purchased the August 2017 Evo magazine. On the section entitled The Knowledge (near the back) it appears that the M4 GTS is no longer in production. The entire line is in italics. This always specifies that the car is obsolete. The M4 GTS was produced in limited numbers. Only 700 were manufactured.
It truly was a magnificent car with 493 bhp.
Safe driving.
FastestLaps 9y ago
So this car narrowly beat Porsche 911R in Motorsport Magazine straight line acceleration duel.
Congratulations M4 GTS, you finally beat something in anything! Btw, it was a perfect matchup, kudos to Motorsport mag!
fakekillerfour 9y ago
estimates data and first drive by car and driver.
Zero to 60 mph: 3.4 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.5 sec
Top speed: 190 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2016-bmw-m4-gts-drive-review
BR2+ 10y ago
...Not every...
I bet it doesnt even loose 60kg
The carbon on the interior looks really nice, But cmon man, Carbon fiber inn a car used to be a special think, Know you see them in a 20k Kia.. And why is is ALWAYS the same black color? Cmon get some red/blue/green/orange etc i swear.
And what do they mean by fastest? Fastest in what?......
FastestLaps 10y ago
Every chav's dream
In 15 years it will be chav's reality. Even though these cars will not go down in value like regular 3-series or regular M4 / M3.
My favorite feature - the OLED taillights.
ferrariCA 10y ago
So it's just a 3-series with go fast bodywork? Obviously you know nothing about engineering
FastestLaps 10y ago
Whether its ugly or not is open to interpretation. But I get your point.
The BMW marketing ppl probably say something like "make sure it looks much faster than standard version" or "make sure it has enough fast&furious bits to convince people about the 2X price tag".
And thats what we get - a 3-Series with lots of go-faster bits on the bodywork. And they even paint those in contrasting color, just to make sure everyone sees the difference :D
BR2+ 10y ago
Why is it, That every Bmw track car looks ugly? WIth exception to the amazing looking CSL of 04? Of course its just MO, But they have been ugly, The M3 GTS was okay, But nothing id call a good looker, And this one? A small spoiler that doesnt go with the car, Ugly orange rims? Like really? Atleast when Porsche or Dodge makes a track car they make it look like it means the business, And fantastic to look at too, Bmw seems to make there track cars look like teens who just want to make there car look "Cool" You can have GOOD looks and amazing functionality, My god just look how the new ACR looks,
Lescyx 10y ago
For such a spectacular laptime, they should have renamed it after the "Legendary" - CSL ! ! ! (instead of GTS)