Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borders of China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Canley (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Borders of China

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. All of China's borders have their own page. This redundant, short article can be deleted. WisDom-UK (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, contains information not conveyed by a category. Geschichte (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. The 'Borders of China' NavBox provides the links one needs. General Chinese geography info can go on Geography of China.WisDom-UK (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree, more information here than in a category or template. WP:CLN is quite clear, you don't delete one because you like another better. Also please stop nominating so many border articles, just wait and see the results for the ones you already have nominated. Dream Focus 21:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article fits well into a WP:SUMMARYSTYLE structure (Country>> Borders of Country >> Individual Border Articles) and as a list of borders meets WP:CLN. I will do some work on the article to help it function better as CLN. // Timothy :: talk 21:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's 200 countries in the world, about maybe 20 of them have a 'Borders of X' page on Wiki. That's a hell of a lot of work, unless we're going to oikc and choose which countries 'deserve' a page. Seems like a colossal waste of time and and space to me, when the individual border pages are far more useful.WisDom-UK (talk) 22:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 22:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly notable. Zoozaz1 talk 18:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.