User talk:JCMLuis
Welcome to my talk page.
This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know. |
This editor has been thanked by these Wikipedians. |
link to image |
This page has archives. Sections older than 12 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This user is in school. This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. |
Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right
[edit]Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 14:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
very nice page Shimmyfloppa (talk) 13:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Timeline of the 2019 Pacific typhoon season has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Timeline of the Pacific typhoon season in 2019 has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Typhoon Surigae
[edit]Hello JCMLuis,
I've noticed your work on Western Pacific typhoon articles and promoting them, and wanted to know if you'd be interested in helping me promote Typhoon Surigae to GA status. It's been on my radar for a while now and I think it's more of a two-person project. If not I understand but I wanted to see if you'd at least be interested. JayTee⛈️ 18:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @JayTee32: Sure, I'm interested. —JCMLuis 💬 19:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- You can take a look at the article, I'd say it's pretty good as is, any issues should come up during a review, though I think we should cross-check the references to make sure each sentence is supported by the correct ref and make sure the ref templates are uniform. The coverage of the subject and tone overall seems pretty good atm. JayTee⛈️ 21:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Just nominated the Surigae article. I'm also currently working on a GA reassessment to keep Hurricane Allen at GA status so I'll bounce between the two. Feel free to ping me whenever. JayTee⛈️ 01:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- You can take a look at the article, I'd say it's pretty good as is, any issues should come up during a review, though I think we should cross-check the references to make sure each sentence is supported by the correct ref and make sure the ref templates are uniform. The coverage of the subject and tone overall seems pretty good atm. JayTee⛈️ 21:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)