iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hmwith/December08
User talk:hmwith/December08 - Wikipedia Jump to content

User talk:hmwith/December08

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
hmwith's talk page archives (december 2008)

2007
<<
<<
<<
2008
2009
2010
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

The Little Nyonya (was deleted by you)

Hi, today I was googling "The Little Nyonya" TV show expecting to find the original article that was on the Wikipedia a few days ago, instead I found that it had been edited to detail a religion. When I tried to undo the vandal's edit, I think my trackpad slipped and I clicked something else because the page was gone, next thing I know; when I try to get back to the history, it says the page was completely deleted/removed by you because I had accidently removed the contents of the page. I ask you, please revert the page back to the original version that had the details of the TV Show that is aired on MediaCorp TV Channel 8. I saw a page for the show on another wiki named "d-addicts" but is simply wasn't detailed enough in comparison to the page on this Wikipedia. I really need you to revert the page as I would like to view the information on the page. I have been referring to the page for the last two weeks as I have been watching the show on TV as it helps me to make sense of the show, now that it is gone, I have not been able to understand the show which was aired tonight. Please revert the page back to the original; which was about the TV show. Thank you, your help will be appreciated! Cheonge (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I restored it immediately. Have a good day, and let me know if you need any more assistance. =) hmwithτ 19:14, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Always look before you revert :-)

here you undid a vandal's doing. Did you check the article version you reverted it to, however?

Of course, this version is not good to keep :-)

Doing RC patrol is good. However, look at what you're reverting to!

--Lou Crazy (talk) 04:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Anyway, thank you for your hard work! We need good RC patrollers!

omg relli?? thx so much for your advice to an admin who's been here for over two years. I'll be sure to let her know your concerns. GlassCobra 19:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, um... I abstain. Ceran →(cheerchime →carol) 22:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
>_> hmwithτ 21:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

Hey Hmwith, I was doing a review of some deleted articles tonight, when I stumbled across an article where you left the note "not sure if it notable." It was an article on an actor, with no claim to notability. So the article was deleted. You might want to review The Field Guide to Proper Speedy Deletion or my essay. They might give you some insight/help on the CSD criteria... and if you have any questions, feel free to ask.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 06:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC) LOL, I thought you were a newbie based on your edit summary on the one article, didn't realize you were an admin!---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 06:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL balloonman u so funney. u clearly haz good idea of who makez good adminz. GlassCobra 19:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't recall this exact edit, but it seems like I was simply going through & noting that I didn't think it was notable, but that I didn't have the time to look it over, so another admin knew that I already didn't think it met the requirements. hmwithτ 21:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, I don't really remember the article myself (except it was totally not notable) and I saw your tag... and thought, "Wow, somebody new who is learning the ropes." Came here, made my post, and as soon as I saved it, I realized you were an admin. I didn't want to simply delete it and have somebody wonder why I made that post on your page, so I left it... plus, I find it quite entertaining ;-)---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 14:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, definitely. I become less active for a few months & look what happens! I have to actually be accountable for my edits now? Oh, man... hmwithτ 19:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism labelling

This was not vandalism. Tan | 39 17:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! My mistake. Thanks for the heads up, hmwithτ 21:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]