User talk:Erxnmedia

Finding the cure for neurofibroma

Merge Cell division into Cell cycle (same topic, separately developed pages, Cell division is the sketchier and less hard-core one)
Finish merge of Point mutation
Add latest NF research on drug therapies into Neurofibroma
Learn something about Systems biology to the extent that I can comfortably read Cellular model and signal transduction
Read Carcinogenesis for understanding

People: Why am I the only one editing these topics? Has Wikipedia been completely deserted? Am I on a desert island or have I stumbled into the universe of The Road?

Thanks, Erxnmedia (talk) 22:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neurofibromatosis book

I created an NF book and listed it in two places, I don't know if modifying one modifies theother but here are the locations:

Speedy deletion nomination of Richmond Research Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richmond Research Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GrapedApe (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CIA activity forks

I ask you to stop edit warring over the CIA activities in (blank) articles. It looks like a mass AfD proposal is in order to settle the matter. I agree with @Volunteer Marek: on this one. Mnnlaxer (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please start a formal AfD proposal to discuss. Erxnmedia (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on CIA activities in Albania. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

(and of course all the other articles).Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volunteer Marek, it is you who are in the wrong in this edit war. Stop blanking and redirecting articles. There is a debate started. Contribute to that or leave the articles alone. Mnnlaxer (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your edits. If you would have some spare time, it might be good to create an article on CIA/American activities in Poland where they have engaged in kidnapping and torturing people.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to branch this page and add details: CIA activities in Russia and Europe#Poland. Erxnmedia (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bevacizumab. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Get Motivated Seminar

The article Get Motivated Seminar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about company of dubious notability. Even the website is a deadlink

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nthep (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (CIA activities in Yemen) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating CIA activities in Yemen, Erxnmedia!

Wikipedia editor Yoshi24517 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Seems to fail Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please think about adding some reliable secondary sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Yoshi24517's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I will also take a look at it. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Erxnmedia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIA reports regarding Nigeria listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CIA reports regarding Nigeria. Since you had some involvement with the CIA reports regarding Nigeria redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JMHamo (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CIA activities in Israel

A tag has been placed on CIA activities in Israel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Target article was AFD'ed, this should be deleted as well.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 18:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of neurofibromatosis clinics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of neurofibromatosis clinics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of neurofibromatosis clinics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CIA activities in Australia and the Pacific

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:CIA activities in Australia and the Pacific, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Erxnmedia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of neurofibromatosis charities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of neurofibromatosis charities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of neurofibromatosis charities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erxnmedia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improving Synapse.org

Hi. I added some categories to your article Synapse.org. Please add more inline citations (reference) to it. I added one "cite journal" reference as an example. You can use cite journal template for journals and magazines, cite web for web publications and cite book for book mentions. Good luck with your edits! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of General Intelligence Office

The article General Intelligence Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article seems to have been created shortly after 2008 presidential decree was issued, related to intelligence agencies. While it was planned for it to replace the intelligence agency, this seems to have never materialize. The DISIP was succeeded by the SEBIN later.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NoonIcarus (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Appleton Farms Grass Rides

The article Appleton Farms Grass Rides has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability, only reference is to the organization itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apocheir (talk) 02:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Operational Intelligence Watch Officer's Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Operational Intelligence Watch Officer's Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Operational Intelligence Watch Officer's Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]