iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bhaskarbhagawati
User talk:Bhaskarbhagawati - Wikipedia Jump to content

User talk:Bhaskarbhagawati

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Assam Barnstar

[edit]
A Barnstar!
I award this Assam Barnstar to Bhaskarbhagawati for creation of numerous Assam related articles; contributing to WikiProject Assam.

--Redtigerxyz Talk 17:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate ! भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 03:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi Bhaskarbhagawati, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 04:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 07:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

You are welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from TrangaBellam

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Bhaskarbhagawati. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaskar, if you wish to respond to the AE report, now would be a good time since current consensus there is to indefinitely block you. Abecedare (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abecedare, cannot partake in discourse (offline), just take notice.भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 09:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term tendentious editing following discussion at WP:AE.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 22:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhaskarbhagawati (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Although fortuitous, i acknowledge snag in my conduct, will more orderly hereafter.भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 12:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Abecedare:, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Bhaskarbhagawati (21-23 March 2022) adjourned prematurely, consider my statement on board prior to go archived, grateful.भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 16:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You were promptly informed about the AE complaint, and had ample opportunity to respond before it was properly closed. You can now appeal the block as outlined in the block notice, although I'd be opposed to an unblock. Abecedare (talk) 17:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bengaloored for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bengaloored is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengaloored until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 12:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nalbari.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nalbari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nalbari.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nalbari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hari Mandir at Nalbari.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hari Mandir at Nalbari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kamrupi literary figures has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Kamrupi literary figures has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tower House 1962.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tower House 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]