User talk:Agilulf2007

Welcome!

Hello, Agilulf2007! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 14:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Italian genetics

What I couldn't see was ". But similar to Spain and Portugal." Thanks for cooperating. One problem with our articles on genetics is that (besides the articles themselves being cherry picked to make a point sometimes) editors often take material from within the article - to avoid interpreting the source ourselves we need to stick closely to what the summary or perhaps the discussion says. Some editors even avoid abstracts as they feel that not all abstracts are written or vetted by the authors of the study. Dougweller (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venetian Crusade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascalon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lepontic language. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hrs for disrupive editing and personal attacks at Talk:Lepontic language. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

African admixture in Europe

added links pointing to Yoruba and Mozabite

Friuli

added a link pointing to Pliny

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Landsknecht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Insubres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Condottieri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Hafspajen (talk) 07:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franciscan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Belgrade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

African Admixture

Cruciani et al. uses an outdated nomeclature for haplogroups.

Fraccalacci et all did not test Sardinians for M18.

The complete list.

http://i.imgur.com/pKVZW93.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RgbgHv_kjaM/UfrqDycy2LI/AAAAAAAAI_Y/Tuu8PiMoJZI/s1600/F1.large.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyc91 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but M18 derives from V-88 and the highest diversity and frequency of V-88 is found among Chadic speakers of Cameroon, so whatever spread that M18 in Sardinia and Corsica came from Cameroon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyc91 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P25 mutated in V88 among Chadic Speakers of Cameroon, where the highest diversity of this haplogroup has been found.

No, that is exactly incorrect; As Cruciani et al 2010 remarks In summary, our data indicate a significant male contribution from northern Africa (and ultimately Asia) to the gene pool of the central Sahel; One of highest diversity of V88 (V88*) is still in the Siwa Oasis (Berbers) Egypt further manifesting V88 origins outside sub-Sahara Africa in northern Africa with V88 ultimately stemming from <P25<M343 Eurasia (Cruciani Asia) to begin with; V88 and certain clades moved south into the Sahel region but M18 was definitely not one of them for it is completely absent in all of Africa; The most prominent subclade of R1b-V88 in sub-Sahara (Chadic speaking areas) is V69; At best M18 also originated in the Siwa Oasis from V88 and traveled north/west into the Mediterranean (Corsica, Sardinia, Lebanon) or it already originated in Lebanon (from V88) and traveled west into the Mediterranean; But what is very clear is that M18 is not (as you falsely assert) of a R1b-V88 clade from sub-Sahara Africa; It is from V88 of north Africa or Near East (deriving from P25<M343 Eurasia); Agilulf2007 (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M18 derives from V88 and so from Chadic Speakers.

Lebanese have also African admixture from the slave trade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyc91 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M18 derives from V88. Not all V88 among Sub-Saharans is V69. For example in Ouldeme, Cameroon, V88* is found at the frequency of 95.5% and none of it is V69.

At that you would also have to note the sample size; Some sample-sets are simply too low to make such definite conclusion; and the conclusion from Cruciani et al is that V88 migrated from northern Africa into the Sahal zone and given that its ancestors P25<M343 came from Eurasia (Cruciani Asia) one might well be believe it; Agilulf2007 (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Siwa Berbers are surely Bottle Necked and the V88 among them may be the result of back migration from Africa,since other Egyptians/Berbers carry neglibile amount of V88.

Joeyc91 (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We can't be 100% sure until further testing are done. But it's quite obvious that R1b-V88 arrived in Sardinia from a African source, so although it may not be Sub Saharan per se, it's surely African and then it should be included in this page about African admixture.

Joeyc91 (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The testing that was done, however clearly indicates a (R1b) migration from Asia (P25<M343) and a zero presence i.e. complete absense of V88(M18) in all of Africa; Thus M18 (the only presence of R1b1c in Sardinia) has nothing to do with Africa; And what you claim to be 'obvious' is in fact (Cruciani et al 2010), simply false; So do correct your false edits; Agilulf2007 (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then you could as well cancell the parf about the mtdna haplotype U6 which originated in Asia, spread to Africa and then to Europe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyc91 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No; because U6 has an African origin (all clades) M18 of V88 does not; You can Re-Read all my posts on the talk pages but if you dont get it than you dont get it; false info remains false info; Agilulf2007 (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

V18 is a subclade of V88, just like V69 and V35.

So if V88 is African as its highest diversity suggests, then also V18 is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyc91 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its M18 and not V18; And where is the highest diversity of M18? It cant be in Africa because it doesnt exist in Africa, it can only be in the three places so far located and that is Sardinia, Corsica and Lebanon (most likely Lebanon);
What is fact (Cruciani et al 2010) is that R1b-V88 originates from a migration of P25<M343 from Asia towards northern Africa and from there into the Sahal region (Cruciani et al 2010) with M18 (one of its subcaldes) having a zero presence (i.e. complete absenty) in All of Africa; Thus most likely already originating in the Near East (Levantine/Lebanon) from V88 on route to northern Africa; Because if it would have originated in Africa (like subclade V69) it would also be having a presence in Africa (like subclade V69) but it doesnt;
PS: if you are so fixated on high diversity, why dont you make the obvious case than that R1b(U152) is Italian? The highest diversity of U152* is in Italy and also the highest diversity of U152>L2* is in Italy and of many other U152 subclades (Z192*) as well; Agilulf2007 (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get your point. There is only R1b1c1/V18, no V18*/R1b1c1* has been found so far, so the V18 is a recent intruder in Sardinia, as there is no diversity at all.

Look at Y-DNA Haplogroup R and its Subclades from this website.

http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR.html

R1b1c and R1b1c* have been found only in Africa. So R1b-V88 is of African origin.

R1b1c1/V18, R1b1c2/V35 and R1b1c3/V69 are subclades of African V88 so they are also of African origin.

I've read Cruciani et al. and there is nothing which say that V88 originated in Asia. V88 originated in Africa from Asian P25*, just by looking at its highest point of diversity.

Joeyc91 (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you say that R1b1c and R1b1c* have been found only in Africa. So R1b-V88 is of African origin than that is simply false; Because M18(<V88) was not found in Africa, because it does not exist in Africa; And Cruciani et al 2010 (read it again) clearly states an R1b migration from Asia into northern Africa and that M18 is completely absent in Africa, thus M18 and its ancestor V88 existed before entering northern Africa; The phylogenetic tree you posted is correct as are the trees in Cruciani et al 2010 (read it again) and further disprove your false assertions;
PS: Of course there is diversity in M18 (as there is diversity in V35 with V7 - tested in Cruciani et al 2010 / but not in your internet source), and when a scientist will eventually study and test the molecular diversity of/in M18 we will know the place of Origins - Lebanon, Corsica or Sardinia, but definitely not Africa because it doesnt even exist in Africa; To read Cruciani et al 2010 again; Agilulf2007 (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cruciani et al is a 5 years old study which uses a very old and incorrect nomeclature.

The correct nomeclature as for 2015 is in this page

http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR.html

V18 is a subclade of V88 which originated in Africa, hence V18 is an African haplogroup.

Stop quoting old stuff from 2010 to win this argument.

Joeyc91 (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

False once again; Your internet page is not up to date for it doesnt even include V7 as a subclade V35; Cruciani et al 2010 on the other hand is an academic study and testing R1b1c(V88) specifically is thus more accurate and revealing; However both the phylogenetic tree at ISOGG and Cruciani et al 2010 are correct and disprove your false assertions; And in case you havent noticed both ISOGG and Cruciani et al identify the subclade as M18 not V18; Agilulf2007 (talk) 12:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no V7 as for 2015. Stop living in 2010 with its wrond and outdated nomeclature. Cruciani et al points out that V88 mutated from asian P25*, but says nothing about the origin of V88. On the other hand the highest diversity of V88 is found in Africa, so it's an African haplogroup just like mtdna haplotypes M1 and U6. V18 is a subclade of African V88. There is no evidence as for 2015 that it originated in Lebanon or Sardinia.

Joeyc91 (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And that is the same false nonsense over and over again; Just re-read all my posts on the talk pages and the academic study i cited; As for V7 of course V7 exists as a subclade of V35 academic fact since Cruciani et al 2010;
You looky looky: http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR10.html
http://vizachero.com/R1b1/R1btreev2.png Agilulf2007 (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You sent me the link to the Isogtree of 2010, based on Cruciani et al.

You can only quote outdated and incorrect stuff from 2010, while all the evidence from 2015 supports my thesis.

Stop vandalizing the wikipedia page about African Admixture or I will report you to moderators.

Joeyc91 (talk) 12:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact the moderators;Agilulf2007 (talk) 12:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the part about R1b-V88 and added new stuff. Please read it before reverting the edit.

Joeyc91 (talk) 14:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex2006 (talk) 14:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Italian American. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Your recent editing history at African admixture in Europe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 11:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring on African admixture in Europe. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Why do you cancell the map of Italic peoples from this article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italic_peoples

And what's the point in posting an debatable image about Italic languages in that article and not in this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italic_languages

Lavezzicavani1 (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sicily, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sardinians

Hi Agilulf! I posted my reply on the talk page. Let me know what you think about it. :-) Tchüss!--Dk1919 (talk) 13:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly for letting me know. :) --Dk1919 (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castel del Monte. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Agilulf2007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Agilulf2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A request... :)

Hi! I noticed you edit a lot of Italian and history articles from WikiProject: Italy. I've been working on improving Lago di Bientina a large (now-drained) lake in Tuscany, but I'm still pretty new to Wikipedia and am not exactly confident in my work. It started out as one sentence and I've added a lot over the last few days. If you could take a look and give me some guidance, tips, or pointers, that would be awesome, I'd really appreciate it! Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agilulf2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agilulf2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battle of Legnano

Hi. I do not agree. It seems to me a well structured and precise article on the subject (the battle of 1176). And I think the map is necessary, since it clarifies the position of the battle (among other things I took inspiration from other items on battles to insert the map). Finally it is normal that it is based on conjectures: we are talking about a medieval battle where certainties are few. In my opinion a draft is useless, the voice is fine. --LukeWiller (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I'm sorry but I remain of my opinion: your observations do not seem convincing to me. I hope an edit war doesn't break out ... --LukeWiller (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

The draft you proposed is too incomplete. I therefore remain of my idea: the level of detail is fine. --LukeWiller (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Among other things, a 60kb voice seems to me to be anything but detailed (we are talking about in-depth level): it is the classic voice with a medium depth. --LukeWiller (talk) 09:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the Isonzo

Where did you get all of these numbers? Please WP:CITE a WP:RS. And why did you make all of these changes to the infoboxes? Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Teatro di San Carlo into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 17:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain, Enlightenment and Treaty of Vienna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castel del Monte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First Battle of Monte Grappa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Novara

Before writing your comment on the talk page of the battle of Novara about Gaston Bodart, you could have at least taken 30 seconds to make a google search on him. You would have found that he was not French, since he was an Austrian military historian and statistician, and was an assistant commissioner of the Imperial and Royal Commission of Austria. Claiming that he did not make any research on the battle is pretty ludicrous, and his figures are widely used on Wikipedia for hundreds of battles. LaHire07 (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian front (World War I), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages South Slavic, Eastern Front and Triple Alliance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Adwa, you may be blocked from editing. محرر البوق (talk) 14:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add my voice to this and ask you to please stop edit warring, as you appear to be doing on this article. So far three of us have expressed disagreement with your edit. That should be the time when you step back and reassess, not revert to restore your preferred version. Generalrelative (talk) 11:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cinderella157 (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics awareness notice

You have recently made edits related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). This is a standard message to inform you that the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes) is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corpo Truppe Volontarie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Industry, Prestige and Palmi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etruscan civilization, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Etruscan, Aegean and Hellenism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Etruscan Civilization, you may be blocked from editing. --Tursclan (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Etruscan Civilization

Your edits in the article are not an improvement. You deleted entire paragraphs that had up-to-date sources, inserted paragraphs based on weak sources or completely unsourced, and in some cases inserted information that was already in the article. In other cases you appear to have copied from this online site [1]. I see that you have been repeatedly involved in edit wars, have been blocked several times over time, and that often your contributions are against the consensus of other editors. The idea that the genetic affiliation of Etruscan to a language family is still unclear is a concept that has been considered outdated for years. I invite you to collaborate on Wikipedia by following the rules. --Tursclan (talk) 11:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Etruscan civilization. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Joe (talk) 12:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you do discuss, please try to keep it more civil than this. – Joe (talk) 12:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canopy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Giovanni di Bricherasio to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Broc (talk) 14:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Cortenuova

added links pointing to Lodi and Crema

Battle of Giglio

added a link pointing to Giglio

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Cortenuova, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lodi and Crema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]