User talk:Adam37

I welcome any message of thanks, point of view or critique.

Autopatrolled

Hi Adam37, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ^™ 13:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing!

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of London Square (disambiguation)

The article London Square (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation not required (WP:2DABS). Primary topic has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

I say this not to be unkind, but to encourage some quiet reflection. I can tell with complete certainty without needing to look at the edit history when you have substantially edited an article. MRSC (talk) 08:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what policy or style you think I need to follow more. If you have a preference then why not say so? Your style is not bad, perhaps you could also reflect on not to take any change or hallmark idiosyncracy in style as a problem?- Adam37 Talk 12:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harrow Way / Old Way map

Ten years ago you created a map now found on Commons, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle - Locations with Old Way.png - it looks as if it was derived from a vector map, and I always prefer vector, SVG, version. I cannot though see an SVG map of the British Isles in that much detail, with every little river traced. Have you come across one?

Thanks. Hogweard (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not memorably. There is the means to convert, say xxx to pdf then pdf to svg. I see what you mean and like (like everyone wiki) as to scale-ability. However firstly it is not the be all an end all, and secondly "little river" these days covers in reality any stream, for instance most of those with the average flow and jump-ability of streams are routinely called maps something they seldom were before say 1950 or 1900. All to do with obsessions with a generic term I'm sad to say. If you would like a hydrological map I am sure the EA and flood search agencies have them, however piecing your own together could be a labour of love.- Adam37 Talk 16:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Springs, Gloucestershire article

Hello.

Please always use converters when adding imperial or metric units in articles. In English Wikipedia articles, both units of measurement need to be included, but not just one unit of measurement. See Template:Convert.

Thank you. 31.200.12.202 (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rowing on the River Thames, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:V and WP:LEDE cover-to-cover. You obviously are a doubter and a deletionist. The content stood in line with others on the subject and you need to respect the sport and recreation also it can be of rowing and not be so anti-rowing. I have never known someone so anti-rowing in my life, whether on wikipedia or in the world of broad academia. There are many football hooligans, convicted, who have more respect for rowing than your shambolic and disrespecting, left-field edits.- Adam37 Talk 19:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Could you explain these templates you added to your userpage? The reason I ask is that you claim you promoted Dorset to Featured but it was promoted in 2012 and your unhelpful edits to that article came in 2015, mostly getting in the way of Ykraps who did all the work. Your userpage also claims a Good article but all I can find are insufficient reviews like Talk:Stanley Bruce/GA1, Talk:Norman, Oklahoma/GA1, and Talk:2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/GA1. You also nebulously claim a DYK but I see no evidence of that, either. I'd love to know where we have a disconnect. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Much of it is true and truth is not an absolute but more of an art where the work is more artistic than scientific (the bulk). OK let's take that off. It's fair but not wholly true. I hope that slightly muses.- Adam37 Talk 16:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not taking off the more absolute truths about me expanding DYKs (before they got DYK), 1,334 bytes to Wentworth Estate and many others, often the most obviously lacking bytes as I only add content where I have read around the subject broadly.- Adam37 Talk 18:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

autopatrolled

Adam, I've removed your autopatrolled perm per the discussion at Talk:Rowing_on_the_River_Thames#Sources_are_now_required. Valereee (talk) 20:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undo that. The source was at the foot of the article.- Adam37 Talk 16:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Harassment is also a factor in this block. Cullen328 (talk) 20:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adam37 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you all look, please, at my recent history you can see I am adding citations from reliable sources to other articles. I am also not reverting to the main source of this friction, which stood for a long time past other interested experienced editors using the major independent rowing calendar for the UK as its (sad but OKish?) single, meticulously compiled secondary source (Biddulph's rowing page). Furthermore I am currently working on two articles relegated, without telling me, to DRAFT space, by the warring experienced editor who is trying to accuse me of disliking making inline citations. I am not harassing but asking for their apology as their behaviour has been tyrannical and it is not within normal behaviour. I am the one who has been harassed as I have not been given any fair process instead stern action has been taking when I was making a case and not edit warring and for simple academic language or debate they have put sanctions in place. I am now hampered in my pure work of adding citations which is all I intended to do for some weeks.- Adam37 Talk 20:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your recent edits are full of melodramatic incivility, assuming bad faith, and aspersions. There's an old legal aphorism that goes, "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." What you're doing is pounding the table. You need to stop doing that. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you have to obey our rules. That means properly sourcing content, being civil during discussions, and assuming good faith. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of irregularly named sites in England

Hello, Adam37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of irregularly named sites in England, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of irregularly named sites in England

Hello, Adam37. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of irregularly named sites in England".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Edersee

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Edersee. Not welcome at da SD (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pathetic. Vandalism requires intention and mistakes. Neither of which were there. You appear to be edit warring which is childish.- Adam37 Talk 19:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Place name changes in Turkey

Place name changes in Turkey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Aintabli (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fulham Reach Boat Club

Hello, Adam37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fulham Reach Boat Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Guildford Rowing Club

Hello, Adam37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guildford Rowing Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fulham Reach Boat Club

Hello, Adam37. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fulham Reach Boat Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guildford Rowing Club

Hello, Adam37. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guildford Rowing Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Company of Watermen and Lightermen

It's seems absurd to bring this to you as you uploaded the image more than 2 years ago, and did great work to find it, but I'm not a wikipedia editor and don't know the etiquette of it all or really what to do so please delete this as soon as you've read this and cursed me but: The arms, etc, and etc on the page (and armorial of london list) are those of the fishmongers not the watermen. Their crest is on their flag and, in incredibly low resolution, on their wordpress website. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorens Löwenhielm (talk • contribs) 15:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unification of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wimbledon station

Padding is unecessary, it adds nothing to the article and you have provided no sources. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How flagrantly against what I put - I removed a couple of padding words and instead put what google maps shows which is what everyone sees too on the train. You are curating rather than adding substance. In fact you behaving as if estate agent words need to go into the lead as not admitting it had ANY padding either. Just wrong per WP:V and WP:COPYEDIT - presumably you require a railway source for every plain fact. Even London is southeast of Birmingham.- Adam37 Talk 20:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what that rant was supposed to mean. If you have a problem with the idea providing sources for material added to articles perhaps wikipedia is not the best place for you. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a rant to use English. I have now compromised with your position which is indeed off the scale protectionist. It's not a rant to characterise edits, only to "curate" which is what you are doing of all UK railway articles.- Adam37 Talk 20:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still don't understand what you think you are driving at, what has Birmingham got to do with anything? You added padding and unsourced material, apparently on the grounds that you saw it from the train. That is original research. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:V - it says obvious things on maps require no citation. Admittedly I didn't write my full edit summary to my first edit but edit summaries are somewhat optional. I should not have to plead with just you as the owner of the article - you are not the owner of the article - the improvements are about mentioning the nearby traincare depot and showing a correct diagram of both Raynes Park and how the lines are grade segregated which is a colossal piece of work dozens of workers achieved.- Adam37 Talk 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What has the depot to do with the station? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the station diagram (not by me) in the article; it has more than six effects. 1) it has platforms which can lead to confusion 2) it has many workers who use the station 3) close ties in history to heritage of the platform areas such as signal boxes 4) it is not uncommon to mention features of a line across a sprawling zone in a station's article - so too number of car parks and landmark buildings in sight necessarily 5) it imposes daily speed restrictions and red signals to the trains which the station encounters 6) a not to be confused element as novels and cross-cutting papers such as in local planning and engineering may refer to "at Wimbledon" which could mean either and so it is useful to give a very simple description of both, the largest depot (of the SW Main Line) does this. Presumably you would keep nearby building mention yet scrap rail infrastructure mention. - Adam37 Talk 17:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't presume, you have no information to make any such presumptions. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]