Committed identity: 9053e0c5dc2bd1c3403a53772edd3ec0e19e02593d637baf56f050ec5eb48a78ef44daba3ea1a6d6344afc42ea939d2cf809b55c4ad565aa3d4e0bfb3c248017 is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
If you have come here because I have reverted an edit of yours:
No, I'm not part of a conspiracy to hide "the truth."
No, I'm not biased against you, and I could be wrong.
If you (hopefully respectfully) disagree with me, come and leave a message on my talk page, described below (click SHOW)
Sometimes, I can make mistakes. That happens, and given one civil message, I can redact the warning, restore your content, and everything should be okay. However, to do so, please comply with some ground rules:
Discuss, in a calm manner, why you disagree with my revert.
If you, in hindsight, actually think I was right, then all is well, and things should be okay.
Lastly, I'm willing to apologise for my actions, but in turn, you should be too. Like me, you're not always right, and please don't insist you are, especially even if I've provided substational evidence to the contrary.
When creating articles on forums, fansites, or other webpages, remember that Wikipedia has two notability requirements for these types of articles. These requirements are:
The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself
The website or content has won a well known and independent award
While a particular website need not meet both of these requirements, it should meet at least one of them.
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
