Template talk:Cardcaptor Sakura

Cardcaptor Sakura OST's

Recently 5 articles have been produced of the Cardcaptor Sakura Original Soundtracks (OST 1, OST 2, OST 3, OST 4, Movie 1 OST) And I was thinking of including these in the template for all related Card Captor Sakura articles to have access. I know there is a Media Information link and then you go to the OST from there but that where the annoyance comes from. I already started to produce the new feature of the OST's as a Music Guide. Justify or critisize my requisition, or suggest notes to make improvments for the new Music Guide. Thank you. Xangel 13:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted as well as redirected the articles. They're nothing more than track listings, rather than encyclopedic articles. -- Ned Scott 04:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute. Why did you remove all articles on the Cardcaptor Sakura Soundtracks? These Soundtracks are officially part of the Cardcaptor Sakura franchise and you also say that they are nothing more than track listings. They have one paragraph each so therefore shouldn't you leave it as they are but place a stub tag on them. I am new to this wikipedia editing thing but frankly I'm upset about this. Jeez. Xangel 04:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraphs were all the same "this is a soundtrack for..". I'm sorry if you are upset by this, and please don't take it personally, but these are the kind of articles we try to avoid on Wikipedia. They have a tendency to spread like weeds, because people see one so they think it's ok to start another. If we have anything that can be said about a specific OST that couldn't be said on the list of media page, then there would be a reason to have stubs. -- Ned Scott 04:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox?

What happened to this template? I really liked this template before Dinoguy1000's April edit using this "Navbox" program... What gives? Is there some kind of standard the previous one didn't adhere to? MasamuneXGP (talk) 03:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was done by project consensus months ago, as part of an on-going effort to clean up our eries templates. As you guessed, the previous one did not adhere to the standard appearance, hence it being recorded to use the standard Navbox system. It cleaned up the appearance, makes it more consistent with other series templates, and made it much easier to modify the template even with little template experience.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was discussed on the SM project's talk page before it was done, anyways. —Dino guy 1000 17:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was about the SM template...this is the CCS one *grin* -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, right... *slaps forehead* duh... —Dino guy 1000 20:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]