iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Williams_Carter_Wickham
Talk:Williams Carter Wickham - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Williams Carter Wickham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Williams Carter Wickham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article states that after being captured in May 1862, Wickham was paroled. On the other hand, the article on Thomas L. Kane mentions a Kane-Wickham prisoner exchange in August 1862. Could someone with a good knowledge of the subject sort this out? Aerkem (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

It's like the good ol' terrorist/freedom fighter dichotomy. Me, I'm on the side of calling the statue removal the will of the people at work, but that's an editorial spin that really doesn't belong in Wikipedia's account of the statue's toppling, tempted though I am to put it there.

Neither do the "unrest" or "violent" comments belong, in my opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaseolus (talkcontribs) 17:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]